Skip to main content

Leading Professional Change Through Research(ING)

Conceptual Tools for Professional Practice and Research

  • Chapter
Transformative Doctoral Research Practices for Professionals

Part of the book series: Critical Issues in the Future of Learning and Teaching ((CIFL))

Abstract

Asking unusual and interesting questions and making original connections that make us (adults) notice new things about our world is typically considered a sign of intelligent thinking in children. As we become encultured into various expert practices and communities, it becomes increasingly difficult to ask such questions and escape our taken-for-granted assumptions and habits. When I ask professional graduate students to think of an example of something that made them gain a genuinely novel perspective on their practice, they often struggle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Apelgren, B.-M., Burnard, P., & Cabaroglu, N. (2015). Theory-use in teacher research. In P. Burnard, B.-M. Apelgren, & N. Cabaroglu (Eds.), Transformative teacher research: Theory and practice for the C21st (pp. 3–12). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakkenes, I., Vermunt, J. D., & Wubbels, T. (2010). Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: Learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 533–548. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassey, M. (1992). Creating education through research. British Educational Research Journal, 18(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, B., Lepp, M., Morrison, M., & O’Toole, J. (2015). Drama for learning in professional development contexts: A global perspective. In Acting to manage conflict and bullying through evidence-based strategies (pp. 119–141). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, K., Harrison, S., & Marshall, M. (2007). Is the metaphor of “barriers to change” useful in understanding implementation? Evidence from general medical practice. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 12(2), 95–100. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1258/135581907780279657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driessen, E. W., Van Tartwijk, J., Overeem, K., Vermunt, J. D., & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2005). Conditions for successful reflective use of portfolios in undergraduate medical education. Medical Education, 39(12), 1230–1235. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02337.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, L. M., & Timperley, H. (Eds.). (2009). Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using evidence for improvement. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2001). Researching pedagogy: A sociocultural agenda. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 9(2), 161–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2010). Being an expert professional practitioner: The relational turn in expertise (Vol. 3). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at the boundaries between professional practices: Relational agency and relational expertise in systems of distributed expertise. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(1), 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, M. E., Léon, G., Bouchard, G., Ouimet, M., Grimshaw, J. M., & Lavis, J. N. (2014). Barriers, facilitators and views about next steps to implementing supports for evidence-informed decisionmaking in health systems: A qualitative study. Implementation Science, 9(1), 179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, R. (2003). Sairauden kokemisen moniäänisyys terveydenhuollossa (Finn., The multivoicedness of experiencing illness in health care). In M.-L. Honkasalo, I. Kangas, & U. Seppälä (Eds.), Sairas, potilas, omainen–Näkökulmia sairauden kokemiseen (pp. 308–331). Helsinki: SKS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1996). Development as breaking away and opening up: A challenge to Vygotsky and Piaget. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 55(2–3), 126–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2007). From stabilization knowledge to possibility knowledge in organizational learning. Management Learning, 38(3), 271–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, S. D., Green, S. E., O’Connor, D. A., McKenzie, J. E., Francis, J. J., Michie, S., Buchbinder, R., Schattner, P., Spike, N., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2012). Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: A systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implementation Science, 7(1), 38. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, M.-P., Attieh, R., Ghandour, E. K., Légaré, F., Ouimet, M., Estabrooks, C. A., & Grimshaw, J. (2014). A systematic review of instruments to assess organizational readiness for knowledge translation in health care. PloS One, 9(12), e114338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., & Griffin, D. (2002). Introduction-heuristics and biases: Then and now. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, 1–18.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldacre, B. (2013). Building evidence into education. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, T., Howick, J., & Maskrey, N. (2014). Evidence based medicine: A movement in crisis? BMJ, 348, g3725. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, J. M., & Russell, I. T. (1993). Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: A systematic review of rigorous evaluations. The Lancet, 342(8883), 1317–1322. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-N

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. The Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hantrais, L., Lenihan, A. T., & MacGregor, S. (2015). Evidence-based policy: Exploring international and interdisciplinary insights. Contemporary Social Science, 10(2), 101–113. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2015.1061687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. (1996). Teaching as a research-based profession: Possibilities and prospects (The Teacher Training Agency Lecture 1996). London: Teacher Training Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, L., Service, O., Goldacre, B., & Torgerson, D. (2012). Test, learn, adapt: Developing public policy with randomised controlled trials. Cabinet Office-Behavioural Insights Team. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2131581

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, S., Hassler, B., & Hofmann, R. (2015). Challenges and opportunities for teacher professional development in interactive use of technology in African schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(5), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, R. (2008a). Ownership in learning: A sociocultural perspective on pupil engagement, collaboration and agency in the classroom (unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, R. (2008b). Rethinking “ownership of learning”: Participation and agency in the storyline classroom. In S. Bell, S. Harkness, & G. White (Eds.), Storyline: Past, present and future (pp. 64–78). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, R. (in press). Book review of Finnish innovations and technologies in schools: A guide towards new ecosystems of learning by Niemi et al. Teacher Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, R., & Mercer, N. (2015). Teacher interventions in small group work in secondary mathematics and science lessons. Language and Education, 20(3), 1–17. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13664530.2015.1131474#.V0qf1Hi9Kc0

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (1988). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation. In D. Roger & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugtenberg, M., Schaick, J. M. Z., Westert, G. P., & Burgers, J. S. (2009). Why don’t physicians adhere to guideline recommendations in practice? An analysis of barriers among Dutch general practitioners. Implementation Science, 4(1), 54. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacBeath, J. E. C., & Dempster, N. (2009). Connecting leadership and learning: Principles for practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maine, F., & Hofmann, R. (2016). Talking for meaning: The dialogic engagement of teachers and children in a small group reading context. International Journal of Educational Research, 75, 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, B., Kitson, A., Harvey, G., Rycroft-Malone, J., Titchen, A., & Seers, K. (2002). Getting evidence into practice: The meaning of “context.” Journal of Advanced Nursing, 38(1), 94–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHoul, A. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7(2), 183–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, D. (2005). Bridging the gap between research and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(3), 357–382. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/03057640500319065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (2007). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 1(2), 137–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, H., Multisilta, J., Lipponen, L., & Vivitsou, M. (2014). Finnish innovations and technologies in schools: A guide towards new ecosystems of learning. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., Christodoulou, A., Howell-Richardson, C., & Richardson, K. (2013). Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 315–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plochg, T., Klazinga, N. S., & Starfield, B. (2009). Transforming medical professionalism to fit changing health needs. BMC Medicine, 7, 64. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-7-64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainio, A. P., & Hofmann, R. (2015). Transformations in teachers’ discourse about their students during a school-led pedagogic intervention. The European Journal of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 13(2), 1815–1829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2000). Pupil participation and pupil perspective: ‘carving a new order of experience’. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, K. (2005). Improving the development and warranting of good practice in teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(3), 407–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, K., Mercer, N., Taber, K., Guardia, P., Hofmann, R., Ilie, S., Luthan, S., & Riga, F. (2016). A research-informed dialogic-teaching approach to early secondary-school mathematics and science: The pedagogical design and field trial of the epiSTEMe intervention. Research Papers in Education, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation (G. Jefferson & E. A. Schegloff, Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shojania, K. G., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2005). Evidence-based quality improvement: The state of the science. Health Affairs, 24(1), 138–150. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (1983). The clinical subject: Adolescents in a cleft-palate clinic. Sociology of Health & Illness, 5(3), 253–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2007). A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about qualitative research. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., & Spillane, J. (2005). What can researchers on educational leadership learn from research on teaching? Building a bridge. In W. A. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 28–45). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaffield, S., & Dempster, N. (2009). A learning dialogue. In Connecting leadership and learning: Principles for practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Ing, M. (2006). Small-group reflections: Parallels between teacher discourse and student behavior in peer-directed groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 63–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, A. W. (2010). The uses of evidence for educational policymaking: Global contexts and international trends. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 1–24. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09350472

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hofmann, R. (2016). Leading Professional Change Through Research(ING). In: Burnard, P., Dragovic, T., Flutter, J., Alderton, J. (eds) Transformative Doctoral Research Practices for Professionals. Critical Issues in the Future of Learning and Teaching. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-630-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-630-9_11

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-630-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics