Abstract
Asking unusual and interesting questions and making original connections that make us (adults) notice new things about our world is typically considered a sign of intelligent thinking in children. As we become encultured into various expert practices and communities, it becomes increasingly difficult to ask such questions and escape our taken-for-granted assumptions and habits. When I ask professional graduate students to think of an example of something that made them gain a genuinely novel perspective on their practice, they often struggle.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Apelgren, B.-M., Burnard, P., & Cabaroglu, N. (2015). Theory-use in teacher research. In P. Burnard, B.-M. Apelgren, & N. Cabaroglu (Eds.), Transformative teacher research: Theory and practice for the C21st (pp. 3–12). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Bakkenes, I., Vermunt, J. D., & Wubbels, T. (2010). Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: Learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 533–548. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.09.001
Bassey, M. (1992). Creating education through research. British Educational Research Journal, 18(1), 3–16.
Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Burton, B., Lepp, M., Morrison, M., & O’Toole, J. (2015). Drama for learning in professional development contexts: A global perspective. In Acting to manage conflict and bullying through evidence-based strategies (pp. 119–141). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Checkland, K., Harrison, S., & Marshall, M. (2007). Is the metaphor of “barriers to change” useful in understanding implementation? Evidence from general medical practice. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 12(2), 95–100. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1258/135581907780279657
Driessen, E. W., Van Tartwijk, J., Overeem, K., Vermunt, J. D., & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2005). Conditions for successful reflective use of portfolios in undergraduate medical education. Medical Education, 39(12), 1230–1235. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02337.x
Earl, L. M., & Timperley, H. (Eds.). (2009). Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using evidence for improvement. New York, NY: Springer.
Edwards, A. (2001). Researching pedagogy: A sociocultural agenda. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 9(2), 161–186.
Edwards, A. (2010). Being an expert professional practitioner: The relational turn in expertise (Vol. 3). New York, NY: Springer.
Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at the boundaries between professional practices: Relational agency and relational expertise in systems of distributed expertise. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(1), 33–39.
Ellen, M. E., Léon, G., Bouchard, G., Ouimet, M., Grimshaw, J. M., & Lavis, J. N. (2014). Barriers, facilitators and views about next steps to implementing supports for evidence-informed decisionmaking in health systems: A qualitative study. Implementation Science, 9(1), 179.
Engeström, R. (2003). Sairauden kokemisen moniäänisyys terveydenhuollossa (Finn., The multivoicedness of experiencing illness in health care). In M.-L. Honkasalo, I. Kangas, & U. Seppälä (Eds.), Sairas, potilas, omainen–Näkökulmia sairauden kokemiseen (pp. 308–331). Helsinki: SKS.
Engeström, Y. (1996). Development as breaking away and opening up: A challenge to Vygotsky and Piaget. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 55(2–3), 126–132.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2007). From stabilization knowledge to possibility knowledge in organizational learning. Management Learning, 38(3), 271–275.
French, S. D., Green, S. E., O’Connor, D. A., McKenzie, J. E., Francis, J. J., Michie, S., Buchbinder, R., Schattner, P., Spike, N., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2012). Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: A systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implementation Science, 7(1), 38. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-38
Gagnon, M.-P., Attieh, R., Ghandour, E. K., Légaré, F., Ouimet, M., Estabrooks, C. A., & Grimshaw, J. (2014). A systematic review of instruments to assess organizational readiness for knowledge translation in health care. PloS One, 9(12), e114338.
Gilovich, T., & Griffin, D. (2002). Introduction-heuristics and biases: Then and now. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, 1–18.
Goldacre, B. (2013). Building evidence into education. London: Department for Education.
Greenhalgh, T., Howick, J., & Maskrey, N. (2014). Evidence based medicine: A movement in crisis? BMJ, 348, g3725. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3725
Grimshaw, J. M., & Russell, I. T. (1993). Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: A systematic review of rigorous evaluations. The Lancet, 342(8883), 1317–1322. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-N
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–451.
Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. The Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.
Hantrais, L., Lenihan, A. T., & MacGregor, S. (2015). Evidence-based policy: Exploring international and interdisciplinary insights. Contemporary Social Science, 10(2), 101–113. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2015.1061687
Hargreaves, D. (1996). Teaching as a research-based profession: Possibilities and prospects (The Teacher Training Agency Lecture 1996). London: Teacher Training Agency.
Haynes, L., Service, O., Goldacre, B., & Torgerson, D. (2012). Test, learn, adapt: Developing public policy with randomised controlled trials. Cabinet Office-Behavioural Insights Team. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2131581
Hennessy, S., Hassler, B., & Hofmann, R. (2015). Challenges and opportunities for teacher professional development in interactive use of technology in African schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(5), 1–28.
Hofmann, R. (2008a). Ownership in learning: A sociocultural perspective on pupil engagement, collaboration and agency in the classroom (unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Hofmann, R. (2008b). Rethinking “ownership of learning”: Participation and agency in the storyline classroom. In S. Bell, S. Harkness, & G. White (Eds.), Storyline: Past, present and future (pp. 64–78). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
Hofmann, R. (in press). Book review of Finnish innovations and technologies in schools: A guide towards new ecosystems of learning by Niemi et al. Teacher Development.
Hofmann, R., & Mercer, N. (2015). Teacher interventions in small group work in secondary mathematics and science lessons. Language and Education, 20(3), 1–17. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13664530.2015.1131474#.V0qf1Hi9Kc0
Jefferson, G. (1988). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation. In D. Roger & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Lugtenberg, M., Schaick, J. M. Z., Westert, G. P., & Burgers, J. S. (2009). Why don’t physicians adhere to guideline recommendations in practice? An analysis of barriers among Dutch general practitioners. Implementation Science, 4(1), 54. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-54
MacBeath, J. E. C., & Dempster, N. (2009). Connecting leadership and learning: Principles for practice. London: Routledge.
Maine, F., & Hofmann, R. (2016). Talking for meaning: The dialogic engagement of teachers and children in a small group reading context. International Journal of Educational Research, 75, 45–56.
McCormack, B., Kitson, A., Harvey, G., Rycroft-Malone, J., Titchen, A., & Seers, K. (2002). Getting evidence into practice: The meaning of “context.” Journal of Advanced Nursing, 38(1), 94–104.
McHoul, A. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7(2), 183–213.
McIntyre, D. (2005). Bridging the gap between research and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(3), 357–382. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/03057640500319065
Mercer, N. (2007). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 1(2), 137–168.
Niemi, H., Multisilta, J., Lipponen, L., & Vivitsou, M. (2014). Finnish innovations and technologies in schools: A guide towards new ecosystems of learning. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., Christodoulou, A., Howell-Richardson, C., & Richardson, K. (2013). Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 315–347.
Plochg, T., Klazinga, N. S., & Starfield, B. (2009). Transforming medical professionalism to fit changing health needs. BMC Medicine, 7, 64. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-7-64
Rainio, A. P., & Hofmann, R. (2015). Transformations in teachers’ discourse about their students during a school-led pedagogic intervention. The European Journal of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 13(2), 1815–1829.
Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2000). Pupil participation and pupil perspective: ‘carving a new order of experience’. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), 75–89.
Ruthven, K. (2005). Improving the development and warranting of good practice in teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(3), 407–426.
Ruthven, K., Mercer, N., Taber, K., Guardia, P., Hofmann, R., Ilie, S., Luthan, S., & Riga, F. (2016). A research-informed dialogic-teaching approach to early secondary-school mathematics and science: The pedagogical design and field trial of the epiSTEMe intervention. Research Papers in Education, 1–23.
Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation (G. Jefferson & E. A. Schegloff, Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Shojania, K. G., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2005). Evidence-based quality improvement: The state of the science. Health Affairs, 24(1), 138–150. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.138
Silverman, D. (1983). The clinical subject: Adolescents in a cleft-palate clinic. Sociology of Health & Illness, 5(3), 253–274.
Silverman, D. (2007). A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about qualitative research. London: Taylor & Francis.
Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
Stein, M. K., & Spillane, J. (2005). What can researchers on educational leadership learn from research on teaching? Building a bridge. In W. A. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 28–45). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Swaffield, S., & Dempster, N. (2009). A learning dialogue. In Connecting leadership and learning: Principles for practice. London: Routledge.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Ing, M. (2006). Small-group reflections: Parallels between teacher discourse and student behavior in peer-directed groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 63–119.
Wiseman, A. W. (2010). The uses of evidence for educational policymaking: Global contexts and international trends. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 1–24. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09350472
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hofmann, R. (2016). Leading Professional Change Through Research(ING). In: Burnard, P., Dragovic, T., Flutter, J., Alderton, J. (eds) Transformative Doctoral Research Practices for Professionals. Critical Issues in the Future of Learning and Teaching. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-630-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-630-9_11
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-630-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)