Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Technology Education Studies ((ITES,volume 1))

  • 388 Accesses

Abstract

Young people need a wider range of competences than ever before to flourish, in a globalised economy and in increasingly diverse societies. Many will work in jobs that do not yet exist. Many will need advanced linguistic, intercultural and entrepreneurial capacities. Technology will continue to change the world in ways we cannot imagine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alting, A., Vonderen, M. V., Weyers, O., & European GASAT Conference. (1992). Ten years GASAT activities in a changing Europe. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20(6), 481–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996(68), 3–12. doi:10.1002/tl.37219966804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedard, D., Lison, C., Dalle, D., & Boutin, N. (2010). Predictors of student’s engagement and persistence in an innovative PBL curriculum: Applications for engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(3), 511–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitsch Olsen, P., & Pedersen, K. Ã…. (2005). Problem-oriented project work: A workbook (1st ed.). Frederiksberg: Roskilde University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., Morgan, J., & Scheurich, J. (2010). A companion to interdisciplinary STEM project-based learning. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, M. A. (2002). Portraits of PBL: A cross-faculty comparison of students’ experiences of problem-based learning. Linköping: Linköpings Universitet, Department of Behavioural Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, N., & Major, C. H. (2014). Boundary crossings: Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and problem-based learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3/4), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, N., Major, C. H., & Michaelsen, L. K. (2014). Small-group learning in higher education: Cooperative, collaborative, problem-based, and team-based learning. Miami, FL: Miami University.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Graaff, E., & Bouhuijs, P. A. (1993). Implementation of problem-based learning in higher education. Maastricht, The Netherlands:Thesis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2003). Characteristics of problem-based learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5), 657–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2006). Management of change. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533–568. Retrieved from http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0959475202000257/1-s2.0-S0959475202000257-main.pdf?_tid=4e556592-0780-11e5-a070-00000aacb361&acdnat=1433068515_2810f836d6555da1a673115ed53b1f30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolmans, D., & Schmidt, H. (1996). The advantages of problem-based curricula. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 72(851), 535–538. Retrieved from http://pmj.bmj.com/content/72/851/535.full.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edström, K., & Kolmos, A. (2014). PBL and CDIO: Complementary models for engineering education development. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(5), 539–555. doi:10.1080/03043797.2014.895703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edutopia. Project-based learning. Edutopia. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/project-based-learning

  • EU Commission. (2008). Improving competences for the 21st century: An agenda for European cooperation on schools. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52008DC0425

    Google Scholar 

  • Galand, B., Raucent, B., & Frenay, M. (2010). Engineering students’ self-regulation, study strategies, and motivational believes in traditional and problem-based curricula. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(3), 523–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • GK-12. (n.d.). GK-12: STEM activities and resources for K-12 teachers and students. Retrieved from http://www.gk12.org/resources/stem-activities-and-resources-for-k-12-teachers-and-students/

  • Gordon, J., Halász, G., Krawczyk, M., Leney, T., Michel, A., Pepper, D., Putkiewicz, E., & WiÅ›niewski, J. (2009). Key competences in Europe: Opening doors for lifelong learners across the school curriculum and teacher education. CASE Network Reports, (87).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J., Rey, O., Siewiorek, A., Vivitsou, M., & von Reis Saari, J. (2012). KeyCoNet 2012 Literature review: Key competence development in school education in Europe. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, B., Fears, D., Gender and Science and Technology Association, & GASAT Conference. (2008, September 3–8). Proceedings of the 12th international GASAT conference: ‘Challenging and changing in the status quo’, held at the University of Brighton, United Kingdom. Brighton: Albion Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illeris, K. (1974). Problemorientering og Deltagerstyring: Oplæg til Alternativ Didatik. Aalborg: Munksg@Ã¥rd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illeris, K. (2010). Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists … In their own words (reprinted ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, C. (2011). Efforts to increase students’ interest in pursuing science, technology, engineering and mathematics studies and careers. National measures taken by, 21 of European Schoolnet’s member countries, 2011 report. Brussels: European Schoolnet (EUN Partnership AISBL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofoed, L. B., & Kolmos, A. (2004). Development of process competencies by reflection and experimentation. In V. M. S. Gil & H. H. N. Alarcao (Eds.), Challenges in teaching & learning in higher education (pp. 77–90). Portugal: University of Aveiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. (1983). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (1st ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmos, A., & de Graaff, E. (2014). Problem-based and project-based learning in engineering education: Merging models. In B. M. Olds & A. Johri (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 141–161). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmos, A., Fink, F., & Krogh, L. (Eds.). (2004). The Aalborg PBL model: Progress, diversity & challenges. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmos, A., Krogh, L., & Fink, F. K. (2004). The Aalborg PBL model: Progress, diversity and challenges (3rd ed.). Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmos, A., Mejlgaard, N., Haase, S. S., & Holgaard, J. E. (2013). Motivational factors, gender and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(3), 340–358. doi:10.1080/03043797.2013.794198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marra, R. M., Jonassen, D. H., Palmer, B., & Luft, S. (2014). Why problem-based learning works: Theoretical foundations. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3/4), 221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelsen, L. K., Davidson, N., & Major, C. H. (2014). Team-based learning practices and principles in comparison with cooperative learning and problem-based learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3/4), 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville, A. J., & Norman, G. R. (2007). PBL in the undergraduate MD program at McMaster University: Three iterations in three decades. Academic Medicine, 82(4), 370–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering education-Washington, 95(2), 123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocard, M. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe (pp. 20). Brussels: High Level Group on Science Education, Directorate General for Research. Science, Economy and Science, European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raat, J. H., Harding, J., & Mottier, I. (1981). Girls and science and technology. Paper presented at the Girls and Science and Technology Conferences, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Baden, M. (2014). Using problem-based learning: New constellations for the 21st Century. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25, 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinde, V. (2014). Design of course level project based learning models for an Indian engineering institute – An assessment of students’ learning experiences and learning outcomes. Aalborg: Aalborg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2001). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity (Reprinted 2001 ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemann, F. (2005). Teamsamarbejde i folkeskolen. Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv, 7, 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkerson, L., & Gijselaers, W. H. (1996). Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise. WISE Consortium – Pre-K-12 STEM project-based learning. Retrieved from http://experiencewise.org/pre-k-12-stem-project-based-learning/

  • Woods, D. R. (1994). Problem-based learning: How to gain the most from PBL. Hamilton, Waterdown: McMaster University Bookstore.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kolmos, A. (2016). PBL in the School System. In: Vries, M.J.d., Gumaelius, L., Skogh, IB. (eds) Pre-university Engineering Education. International Technology Education Studies, vol 1. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-621-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-621-7_9

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-621-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics