Abstract
To answer these questions, we will discuss relevant literature and use examples from research and experience. All examples are set within secondary education in the Dutch educational system. In this system, there are three levels of education: pre-vocational (four years), general (five years) and pre-university (6 years). Most children enter their secondary education in one of these levels and graduate from that level as well.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abraham, L. M. (2002). What do high school science students gain from field-based research apprenticeship programs? The Clearing House, 75(5), 229–232.
Anderson, D., Kisiel, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2006). Understanding teachers’ perspectives on field trips: Discovering common ground in three countries. Curator: The Museum Journal, 49(3), 365–386.
Anderson, D., & Lucas, K. (1997). The effectiveness of orienting students to the physical features of a science museum prior to visitation. Research in Science Education, 27(4), 485–495.
Bauer, M., Allum, N., & Miller, S. (2007). What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 79–95.
Bleicher, R. E. (1996). High school students learning science in university research laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1115–1133.
Bøe, M. V., Henriksen, E. K., Lyons, T., & Schreiner, C. (2011). Participation in science and technology: Young people’s achievementrelated choices in late-modern societies. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 37–72.
Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373–1388.
Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20.
Cooley, W. W., & Bassett, R. D. (1961). Evaluation and follow-up study of a summer science and mathematics program for talented secondary school students. Science Education, 45(3), 209–216.
Davis, D. D. (1999). The research apprenticeship program: Promoting careers in biomedical sciences and the health professions for minority populations.
DeGrazia, J. L., Sullivan, J. F., Carlson, L. E., & Carlson, D. W. (2001). A K-12/university partnership: Creating tomorrow’s engineers*. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(4), 557–563.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
Falk, J. H., & Balling, J. D. (1982). The field trip milieu: Learning and behavior as a function of contextual events. The Journal of Educational Research, 76(1), 22–28.
Greeno, J. G., Moore, J. L., & Smith, D. R. (1993). Transfer of situated learning. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 99–167). Norwood, NJ, Ablex Publishing.
Heimlich, J. E., Carlson, S.P., & Storksdieck, M. (2011). Building face, construct, and content validity through use of a modified Delphi: Adapting grounded theory to build an environmental field days observation tool. Environmental Education Research, 17(3), 287–305.
Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2005). Factors influencing elementary school children’s attitudes toward science before, during, and after a visit to the UK National Space Centre. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 53–83.
Jenkins, E., Jensen, F., & Henriksen, E. K. (2010). IRIS Working document No. 5.1: Recruitment initiatives and choice of STEM higher education: Review of theoretical perspectives and empirical findings regarding recruitment initiatives inside and outside school 59.
Jet-Net 10 years of Jet-Net, Jet-Net.
Johansson, L. (2009). Mathematics, science & technology education report: The case for a European coordinating body. Brussels: European Round Table of Industrialists.
Knapp, D. (2000). Memorable experiences of a science field trip. School Science and Mathematics, 100(2), 65–72.
Koeman, D., & Meijer, M. (unpublished). Jaarverslag 2015 Stichting C3. Den Haag, Stichting C3.
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pearson Education.
Kubota, C. A., & Olstad, R. G. (1991). Effects of novelty-reducing preparation on exploratory behavior and cognitive learning in a science museum setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(3), 225–234.
Martin, W. W., Falk, J. H., & Balling, J. D. (1981). Environmental effects on learning: The outdoor field trip. Science Education, 65(3), 301–309.
Masson, A.-L., Klop, T., & Osseweijer, P. (2014). An analysis of the impact of student–scientist interaction in a technology design activity, using the expectancy-value model of achievement related choice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 81–104.
Masson, A.-L., Klop, T., & Osseweijer, P. (in process). Improving interaction between secondary school students and scientists.
Miaoulis, I. (2010). K-12 Engineering – The missing core discipline. In D. Grasso & M. Burkins (Eds.), Holistic engineering education (pp. 37–51). New York, NY: Springer.
Neresini, F., & Bucchi, M. (2010). Which indicators for the new public engagement activities? An exploratory study of European research institutions. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 64–79.
OECD. (2008). Encouraging student interest in science and technology studies. OECD, 134.
Ormerod, M. B., Rutherford, M., & Wood, C. (1989). Relationships between attitudes to science and television viewing among pupils aged 10 to 13 +. Research in Science & Technological Education, 7(1), 75–84.
Post, T., & van der Molen, J. H. W. (2014). Effects of company visits on Dutch primary school children’s attitudes toward technical professions. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(4), 349–373.
Price, S., & Hein, G. E. (1991). More than a field trip: Science programmes for elementary school groups at museums. International Journal of Science Education, 13(5), 505–519.
Ritchie, S. M., & Rigano, D. L. (1996). Laboratory apprenticeship through a student research project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 799–815.
Rossouw, A., Hacker, M., & de Vries, M. (2011). Concepts and contexts in engineering and technology education: An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(4), 409–424.
Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 235–256.
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2010). Engineering: Issues challenges and opportunities for development. Paris: Author.
Viruskenner. Retrieved November 2015, from http://viruskenner.nl/?lang=en.
Vries, M. D. (2012). Teaching for scientific and technological literacy: An international comparison. In U. a. R. O. H. Pfenning (Ed.), Wissenschafts-und Technikbildung auf dem Prüfstand (pp. 93–110). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.
Weimer, M. (1990). The teaching professor. Volume 4. Numbers 1–10, January 1990–December 1990. The Teaching Professor, 4, n1–n10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Masson, AL., Klop, T., Osseweijer, P., Vries, M.J.D. (2016). The Role of Engineers in Pre-University Education. In: Vries, M.J.d., Gumaelius, L., Skogh, IB. (eds) Pre-university Engineering Education. International Technology Education Studies, vol 1. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-621-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-621-7_13
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-621-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)