Skip to main content

The Role of Engineers in Pre-University Education

Success-Factors and Challenges

  • Chapter
Pre-university Engineering Education

Part of the book series: International Technology Education Studies ((ITES,volume 1))

  • 360 Accesses

Abstract

To answer these questions, we will discuss relevant literature and use examples from research and experience. All examples are set within secondary education in the Dutch educational system. In this system, there are three levels of education: pre-vocational (four years), general (five years) and pre-university (6 years). Most children enter their secondary education in one of these levels and graduate from that level as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abraham, L. M. (2002). What do high school science students gain from field-based research apprenticeship programs? The Clearing House, 75(5), 229–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., Kisiel, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2006). Understanding teachers’ perspectives on field trips: Discovering common ground in three countries. Curator: The Museum Journal, 49(3), 365–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., & Lucas, K. (1997). The effectiveness of orienting students to the physical features of a science museum prior to visitation. Research in Science Education, 27(4), 485–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M., Allum, N., & Miller, S. (2007). What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleicher, R. E. (1996). High school students learning science in university research laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1115–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bøe, M. V., Henriksen, E. K., Lyons, T., & Schreiner, C. (2011). Participation in science and technology: Young people’s achievementrelated choices in late-modern societies. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 37–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373–1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, W. W., & Bassett, R. D. (1961). Evaluation and follow-up study of a summer science and mathematics program for talented secondary school students. Science Education, 45(3), 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. D. (1999). The research apprenticeship program: Promoting careers in biomedical sciences and the health professions for minority populations.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGrazia, J. L., Sullivan, J. F., Carlson, L. E., & Carlson, D. W. (2001). A K-12/university partnership: Creating tomorrow’s engineers*. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(4), 557–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H., & Balling, J. D. (1982). The field trip milieu: Learning and behavior as a function of contextual events. The Journal of Educational Research, 76(1), 22–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G., Moore, J. L., & Smith, D. R. (1993). Transfer of situated learning. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 99–167). Norwood, NJ, Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimlich, J. E., Carlson, S.P., & Storksdieck, M. (2011). Building face, construct, and content validity through use of a modified Delphi: Adapting grounded theory to build an environmental field days observation tool. Environmental Education Research, 17(3), 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2005). Factors influencing elementary school children’s attitudes toward science before, during, and after a visit to the UK National Space Centre. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 53–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E., Jensen, F., & Henriksen, E. K. (2010). IRIS Working document No. 5.1: Recruitment initiatives and choice of STEM higher education: Review of theoretical perspectives and empirical findings regarding recruitment initiatives inside and outside school 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jet-Net 10 years of Jet-Net, Jet-Net.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, L. (2009). Mathematics, science & technology education report: The case for a European coordinating body. Brussels: European Round Table of Industrialists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, D. (2000). Memorable experiences of a science field trip. School Science and Mathematics, 100(2), 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koeman, D., & Meijer, M. (unpublished). Jaarverslag 2015 Stichting C3. Den Haag, Stichting C3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubota, C. A., & Olstad, R. G. (1991). Effects of novelty-reducing preparation on exploratory behavior and cognitive learning in a science museum setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(3), 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, W. W., Falk, J. H., & Balling, J. D. (1981). Environmental effects on learning: The outdoor field trip. Science Education, 65(3), 301–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masson, A.-L., Klop, T., & Osseweijer, P. (2014). An analysis of the impact of student–scientist interaction in a technology design activity, using the expectancy-value model of achievement related choice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masson, A.-L., Klop, T., & Osseweijer, P. (in process). Improving interaction between secondary school students and scientists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miaoulis, I. (2010). K-12 Engineering – The missing core discipline. In D. Grasso & M. Burkins (Eds.), Holistic engineering education (pp. 37–51). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neresini, F., & Bucchi, M. (2010). Which indicators for the new public engagement activities? An exploratory study of European research institutions. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). Encouraging student interest in science and technology studies. OECD, 134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, M. B., Rutherford, M., & Wood, C. (1989). Relationships between attitudes to science and television viewing among pupils aged 10 to 13 +. Research in Science & Technological Education, 7(1), 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, T., & van der Molen, J. H. W. (2014). Effects of company visits on Dutch primary school children’s attitudes toward technical professions. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(4), 349–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, S., & Hein, G. E. (1991). More than a field trip: Science programmes for elementary school groups at museums. International Journal of Science Education, 13(5), 505–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, S. M., & Rigano, D. L. (1996). Laboratory apprenticeship through a student research project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 799–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossouw, A., Hacker, M., & de Vries, M. (2011). Concepts and contexts in engineering and technology education: An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(4), 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 235–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2010). Engineering: Issues challenges and opportunities for development. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viruskenner. Retrieved November 2015, from http://viruskenner.nl/?lang=en.

  • Vries, M. D. (2012). Teaching for scientific and technological literacy: An international comparison. In U. a. R. O. H. Pfenning (Ed.), Wissenschafts-und Technikbildung auf dem Prüfstand (pp. 93–110). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, M. (1990). The teaching professor. Volume 4. Numbers 1–10, January 1990–December 1990. The Teaching Professor, 4, n1–n10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Masson, AL., Klop, T., Osseweijer, P., Vries, M.J.D. (2016). The Role of Engineers in Pre-University Education. In: Vries, M.J.d., Gumaelius, L., Skogh, IB. (eds) Pre-university Engineering Education. International Technology Education Studies, vol 1. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-621-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-621-7_13

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-621-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics