Advertisement

Content Analysis

Chapter
  • 2.4k Downloads
Part of the Teaching Writing book series (WRIT)

Abstract

Mr. Cory Manento conducted this content analysis within the discipline of Political Science. Political scientists study how political systems originate, develop, and operate. Analysis can extend to governments, policies (including legislation), political institutions, and political behavior. Mr. Manento used textual analysis to examine Supreme Court decisions of the “exclusionary rule”, a law stating that evidence collected in violation of one’s constitutional rights may be inadmissible in a court of law.

Keywords

Majority Opinion Civil Liberty Supreme Court Decision Fourth Amendment Conservative Opinion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandes, Susan A. 2009. “The Roberts Court and the Future of the Exclusionary Rule.” Paper for the American Constitutional Society for Law and Policy.Google Scholar
  2. California v. Minjares. 1979. 443 U.S. 916.Google Scholar
  3. Herring v. United States. 2009. 555 U.S. 135.Google Scholar
  4. Hudson v. Michigan. 2006. 547 U.S. 586.Google Scholar
  5. Liptak, Adam. 2009. “Justices Step Closer to Repeal of Evidence Ruling” New York Times, January 31.Google Scholar
  6. Laver, Michael, Benoit, Kenneth, and Garry, John. 2003. “Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data.” American Political Science Review 97 (May): 311–31.Google Scholar
  7. Maclin, Tracey and Rader, Jennifer. 2012. “No More Chipping Away: The Roberts Court Uses an Axe to Take Out the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule.” Mississippi Law Journal 81 (May): 1184–227.Google Scholar
  8. Mapp v. Ohio. 1961. 367 U.S. 643.Google Scholar
  9. Martin, Andrew D. and Quinn, Kevin M. 2002. “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court 1953–1999.” Political Analysis 10: 134–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Martin, Andrew D., and Quinn, Kevin, M. 2014. “Martin-Quinn Scores.” http://mqscores.berkeley.edu/measures.php
  11. McGuire, Kevin T. and Vanberg, Georg. 2005. “Mapping the Policies of the U.S. Supreme Court: Data, Opinions, and Constitutional Law.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  12. Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary. “Exclusionary Rule.” http://www.nolo.com/dictionary/exclusionary-rule-term.html
  13. Rice, Douglas. 2012. “Measuring the Issue Content of Supreme Court Opinions through Probabilistic Topic Models.” Presented at the 2012 Midwest Political Science Association Conference, Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. United States v. Leon. 1984. 468 U.S. 897.Google Scholar
  15. Weeks v. United States. 1914. 232 U.S. 383.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Central Connecticut State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations