Advertisement

Secondary Analysis of Archival Data

Chapter
  • 2.4k Downloads
Part of the Teaching Writing book series (WRIT)

Abstract

Mr. Anthony Huaqui conducted a secondary analysis of archival data in Sociology. Sociologists attempt to understand human social behaviors through the lens of social groups (The Sociology Writing Group, 2008). Edwards (2012) notes that sociologists may start inquiring about an individual’s behavior but then “go bigger”, questioning how small groups or larger organizations and social structures shape that behavior.

Keywords

Racial Discrimination Archival Data Home Ownership Racial Minority General Social Survey 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aguirre, Benigno E., Fredric D. Wolinsky, John Niederauer, Verna Keith, and Lih-Jiuan Fann. 1989. “Occupational Prestige in the Health Care Delivery System.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 30:315–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Duncan, Otis D. 1961. “A Socioeconomic Index for All Occupations.” Pp. 109–38 in Occupations and Social Status, edited by Albert J. Reiss, Jr. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Espino, Rodolfo and Michael M. Franz. 2002. “Latino Phenotypic Discrimination Revisited: The Impact of Skin Color on Occupational Status.” Social Sciences Quarterly, 83(2):612–23.Google Scholar
  4. Hirsch, Eric. 1980. “Dual Labor Market Theory: A Sociological Critique.” Sociological Inquiry, 50(2):133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lamelle, Anthony. 2002. “The Effects of the Intersection of Race, Gender, and Educational Class on Occupational Prestige.” The Western Journal of Black Studies, 26(2):89–97.Google Scholar
  6. Nakao, Keiko and Judith Treas. 1994. “Updating Occupational Prestige and Socioeconomic Scores: How the New Measures Measure Up.” Pp. 1–72 in Sociological Methodology, edited by Peter Marsden. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  7. Phillips, Sandra. 2003. “African Americans and Mortgage Lending Discrimination”. The Western Journal of Black Studies, 27(2):65–79.Google Scholar
  8. Smith, Ryan A. and James R. Elliot. 2002. “Does Ethnic Concentration Influence Employees’ Access to Authority? An Examination of Contemporary Urban Labor Markets.” Social Forces, 81(1):255–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. The General Social Survey. 2014. “About the GSS”. Chicago. Retrieved March 2, 2016 (http://gss.norc.org/About-The-GSS)
  10. The Harris Poll. 2014. “Doctors, Military Officers, Firefighters, and Scientists Seen as Among America’s Most Prestigious Occupations”. September 10. New York: Retrieved March 14, 2016 (http://www.theharrispoll.com/politics/Doctors__Military_Officers__Firefighters__and_Scientists_Seen_as_Among_America_s_Most_Prestigious_Occupations.html)Google Scholar
  11. Xu, Wu, and Ann Leffler. 1992. “Gender and Race Effects on Occupational Prestige, Segregation, and Earnings”. Gender & Society, 6(3):376–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Central Connecticut State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations