Teachers’ Intercultural Competence as Part of Global Competence



Internationalisation is a common aim of official educational policy in many countries. People with different beliefs, values, and lifestyles cannot avoid interacting with each other in multicultural societies and in a globalized world. While persons work with different people in multicultural environments, they have to challenge their behaviour and practices and learn new ways of thinking and interacting.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahonen, H. (2008). Reciprocal development of the object and subject of learning: The renewal of the learning practices of front-line communities in a telecommunications company as part of the techno-economical paradigm change (Research report 218). Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education.Google Scholar
  2. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. A report prepared for the UNESCO 2009 World Conference on Higher Education. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1987). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans., 2nd paperback printing ed.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  4. Banks, J. A., & Banks, C. A. M. (Eds.). (1995). Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 3–31). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Berry, J. W. (2005). Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(4), 697–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Engeström, Y. (2005). Developmental work research expanding activity theory in practice (Vol. 12). Berlin: Lehmanns Media.Google Scholar
  10. Engeström, Y., Pasanen, A., Toiviainen, H., & Haavisto, V. (2005). Expansive learning as collaborative concpet formation at work. In K. Yamazumi, Y. Engeström, & H. Daniels (Eds.), New learning challenges: Going beyond the industrial age system of school and work (pp. 47–77). Osaka: Kansai University Press.Google Scholar
  11. European Commission. (2012). The European Higher Education Area in 2012: Bologna process implementation report. Eurydice: Brussels.Google Scholar
  12. Friedman, V. J., & Antal, A. B. (2005). Negotiating reality: A theory of action approach to intercultural competences. Management learning, 36(1), 68–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holden, N. J. (2002). Cross-cultural management: A knowledge management perspective. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Kemppainen, P. R. (2009). Liike-elämän näkökulma [Business perspective]. In J. Lasonen & M. Halonen (Eds.), Kultuurienvälinen osaaminen koulutuksessa ja työelämässä [Intercultural competence in education and work] (pp. 109–127). (Research in Educational Sciences 43). Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopistopaino.Google Scholar
  15. Kerosuo, H. (2006). Boundaries in action: An activity-theoretical study of development and change in health care for patients with multiple and chronic illnesses. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education.Google Scholar
  16. Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural. An integrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Kim, Y. Y. (2005). Adapting to a new culture. An integrative communication theory. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Lasonen, J. (2010). Internationalization of higher education: A case study on college music teachers’ intercultural expertise. International Education, 40(1), 39–54.Google Scholar
  19. Lasonen, J., & Teräs, M. (2012). Intercultural competence in action. In N. Palaiologou & G. Dietz (Eds.), Mapping the broad field of multicultural and intercultural education worldwide. Towards the development of a new citizen (pp. 156–175). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publisher. ISBN (10): 1-4438-4031-9, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-4031-6Google Scholar
  20. Lasonen, J., Halonen, M., Kemppainen, R. P., & Teräs, M. (2009). Monikultturisuus, kulttuurienvalisyys ja osaamisen tunnustuksen tarve [Multicultural, intercultural and recognition of competence]. In J. Lasonen & M. Halonen (Eds.), Kulttuurienvälinen osaaminen koulutuksessa ja työssä[Intercultural compe tence in education and work] (pp. 9–19). (Research in Educational Sciences 43). Jyväskylä: FERA.Google Scholar
  21. Leontjev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ollman, B. (2003). Dance of the dialectic: Steps in Marx’s method. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rathje, S. (2007). Intercultural competence: The status and future of a controversial concept. Language and Intercultural Communication, 7(4), 254–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sercu, L. (2004, March). Assessing intercultural competence: A framework for systematic test development in foreign language education and beyond. Intercultural Education, 15(1), 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sleeter, C. E. (1996). Multicultural education as social activism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  27. Spitzberg, B. H., & Changnon, G. (2009). Conceptualizing intercultural competence. In D. K. Deardorff (Ed.), The Sage handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 2–52). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Stier, J. (2003). Internationalization, ethnic diversity and acquisition of intercultural competencies. Intercultural Education, 14(1),77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Teräs, M. (2007). Intercultural learning and hybridity in the culture laboratory. Helsinki: Helsinki University, Department of Education.Google Scholar
  30. Teräs, M., & Lasonen, J. (2013). The development of vocational teachers’ intercultural competence using a change laboratory method. Vocation and Learning: Studies on Professional and Vocational Education, 5(2), 107–135. ISSN 1874-785x, electronic 1874-7868. doi: 10.1007/s12189-012-9087-8
  31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Education, Leadership, Counseling, Adult, Career and Higher Education DepartmentUniversity of South FloridaFloridaUS
  2. 2.Finnish Institute for Educational ResearchUniversity of JyväskyläFinland
  3. 3.Department of EducationUniversity of StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations