Skip to main content

Teacher Self-Efficacy and Junior Secondary

Exploring a Moment of Reform in Queensland Schools

  • Chapter
  • 938 Accesses

Abstract

In 2015 all Queensland schools engaged in the biggest education reform in the last 50 years with Year 7 students moving from primary into high school settings. Aligned to this change, all government schools implemented Junior Secondary for Years 7–9. This required the active adoption of six guiding principles which impacted directly on expectations of teacher practice. To prepare for this reform, in 2014 the Department of Education, Training, and Employment (DETE) commissioned the Junior Secondary Leading Change Program (hereafter the Program) for delivery to the Principal and two school leaders of each of the 259 state high school leadership teams across the state. The Program was developed to build capacity in participants to lead effective change processes in schools, including serving as pedagogic leaders for classroom teachers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). (2012). Junior secondary – Theory and practice. Brisbane, QLD: Queensland Government, Department of Education and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2012). The Australian charter for the professional learning of teachers and school leaders. Carlton South, VIC: Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daraganova, G., Edwards, B., & Sipthorp, M. (2013). Growing up in Australia: The Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. Using National Assessment Program: Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) data in the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC) (Technical Paper No. 8). Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Training (DET). (2010). A flying start for Queensland children: Education green paper. Brisbane, QLD: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society, & Education, 7(3), 252–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinham, S., & Rowe, K. (2007). Teaching and learning in middle schools: A review of the literature. Camberwell, VIC: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goos, M., Mills, M., Gilbert, R., Gowlett, C., Wright, T., Renshaw, P., … Honan, E. (2008). Longitudinal study of teaching and learning in Queensland state schools (Stage 1). Brisbane, QLD: Department of Education, Training and the Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (1994). The new professionalism: The synthesis of professional and institutional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(4), 423–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes & efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(10), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, B., Hunter, J., Sonnemann, J., & Cooper, S. (2014). Making time for great teaching (Report No. 2014-3). Australia: Grattan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2013). ‘Catalyst data’: Perverse systemic effects of audit and accountability in Australian Schooling. Journal of Educational Policy, 28(3), 634–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A., Elkins, J., Weir, K., Land, R., Carrington, V., Dole, S., … Stevens, L. (2003). Beyond the Middle: A Report about literacy and numeracy development of target group students in the middle years of schooling (Vol. 1). Brisbane, QLD: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, K. (2013). Australian middle years’ reform: A focus on teachers and leaders as the subjects and agents of change. In I. R. Haslam, M. S. Khine, & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), Large scale reform and social capital building: The professional development imperative (pp. 180–197). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middle Years of Schooling Association. (2008). MYSA position paper. Middle schooling: People, practices and places. Brisbane, QLD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs [MYCEETYA]. (2008). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Retrieved from http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/National_Declaration_on_the_Educational_Goals_for_Young_Australians.pdf

  • Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. New York, NY: McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from http://mckinseyonsociety.com/how-the-worlds-most-improved-school-systems-keep-getting-better/

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendergast, D. (2006). Fast-tracking middle schooling reform: A model for sustainability. Australian Journal of Middle Schooling, 6(2), 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendergast, D., Flanagan, R., Land, R., Bahr, M., Mitchell, J., Weir, K., … Smith, J. (2005). Developing lifelong learners in the middle years of schooling. Brisbane, QLD: The University of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendergast, D., Main, K., Kanasa, H., Barton, G., Hearfield, S., Geelan, D., & Dowden, T. (2014). An ongoing journey: Evaluation of the junior secondary leading change development program. Brisbane, QLD: DET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendergast, D., Main, K., Barton, G., Kanasa, H., Geelan, D., & Dowden, T. (2015). The education change model as a vehicle for reform: Shifting year 7 and implementing junior secondary in Queensland. Australian Journal of Middle Schooling, 15(2), 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 611–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1059–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vagle, V. (2012). Not a Stage! A critical re-conception of young adolescent education. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, K. F. (2002). The potential benefits of teacher efficacy doubts for educational reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pendergast, D., Main, K. (2016). Teacher Self-Efficacy and Junior Secondary. In: Garvis, S., Pendergast, D. (eds) Asia-Pacific Perspectives on Teacher Self-Efficacy. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-521-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-521-0_7

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-521-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics