Advertisement

The Variation in Teaching and Learning Practices and their Contribution to Mathematics Performance in PISA 2012

  • Nordin Abd Razak
  • Azadeh Shafaei
Chapter
  • 438 Downloads

Abstract

Over the years, the issue of students’ learning has attracted many educational researchers’ attention to investigate various factors that contribute to it. Since students’ learning is related to their academic success or failure, the role of the teacher has been identified as the paramount factor in this regard (e.g., Rockoff, 2004; Hanushek, 2011; Aaronson et al., 2007).

Keywords

Teaching Practice Learning Strategy Mathematics Anxiety Learning Practice Instrumental Motivation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), 95–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman, T., Heafner, T., & Bartz, D. (2006, April 10). An examination of the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement. Paper presented at the 2006 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  3. Areepattamannil, S., & Caleon, I. S. (2013). Relationships of cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies to mathematics achievement in four high-performing East Asian education systems. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 174(6), 696–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Artlet, C., Baumert, J., Julius-McElvany, N., & Peschar, J. (2003). Learners for life: Student approaches to learning. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  5. Bietenbeck, J. C. (2013). Teaching practices and cognitive skills. Mimeo CEMFI.Google Scholar
  6. Chiu, M. M., Chow, B., & McBride-Chang, C. (2007). Universals and specifics in learning strategies: Explaining adolescent mathematics, science, and reading achievement across 34 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(4), 344–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Czuchry, M., & Dansereau, D. F. (1998). The generation and recall of personally relevant information. Journal of Experimental Education, 66(4), 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–44.Google Scholar
  9. Eshel, Y., & Kohavi, R. (2003). Perceived classroom control, self-regulated learning strategies, and academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23(3), 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. George, R., & Kaplan, D. (1998). A structural model of parent and teacher influences on science attitudes of eighth graders: Evidence from NELS: 88. Science Education, 82(1), 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanushek, E. A. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 466–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hidalgo-Cabrillana, A., & López-Mayan, C. (2015). Teaching styles and achievement: Student and teacher perspectives (Working Paper 2/2015). Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  15. Isaacs, C., & Carroll, W. (1999). Strategies for basic-facts instruction. Teaching Children in Mathematics, 5(9), 1–17.Google Scholar
  16. Kain, J. F. (1998). The impact of individual teachers and peers on individual student achievement. Paper presented at the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management 20th Annual Research Conference, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  17. Kang, D. H. (1997). Assessing Korean middle school students’ language learning strategies in input-poor environments. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from ERIC database.Google Scholar
  18. Kaur, B., & Areepattamannil, S. (2012). Influences of metacognitive and self-regulated learning strategies for reading on mathematical literacy of adolescents in Australia and Singapore. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng, & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Mathematics education: Expanding horizons (Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia). Singapore: MERGA.Google Scholar
  19. Kincannon, J., Gleber, C., & Kim, J. (1999). The effects of metacognitive training on performance and use of metacognitive skills in self-directed learning situations. Paper presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
  20. Kirsch, I., De Jong, J., LaFontaine, D., McQueen, J., Mendelovits, J., & Monseur, C. (2003). Reading for change: Performance and engagement across countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  21. Lavy, V. (2011). What makes an effective teacher? Quasi-Experimental Evidence (NBER Working Paper 16885).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  23. McCaffrey, J. R., Lockwood, D. F., Koretz, D. M., & Hamilton, L. S. (2003). Evaluating value added models for teacher accountability [Monograph]. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2004/RAND_MG158.pdfGoogle Scholar
  24. Mendro, R., Jordan, H., Gomez, E., Anderson, M., & Bembry, K. (1998). An application of multiple linear regression in determining longitudinal teacher effectiveness. Paper presented at the 1998 Annual Meeting of the AERA, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  25. Najar, R. L. (1999, July 12–15). Pathways to success: Learning strategy instruction and content curriculum. Paper presented in HERDSA Annual International Conference, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  26. OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris, France: The Author. Retrieved July 03, 2009, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/1/60/34002216.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do–student performance in reading, mathematics and science. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/10/61/48852548.pdfGoogle Scholar
  28. OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results: Ready to learn: Students’ engagement, drive and self-beliefs (Vol. III). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Rivers, J. C. (1999). The impact of teacher effect on student math competency achievement (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.Google Scholar
  30. Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2000). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement (Working Paper W6691). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  31. Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458. Retrieved February 19, 2009, from http://edpro.stanford.edu/Hanushek/admin/pages/files/uploads/teachers.econometrica.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. (2002). What large-scale survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the prospects study of elementary schools. The Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1525–1567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sanders, W., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research Center.Google Scholar
  35. Sanders, W. L., Wright, S. P., & Horn, S. P. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of personnel evaluation in education, 11(1), 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  37. Schwerdt, G., & Wuppermann, A. C. (2011). Is traditional teaching really all that bad? A within-student between-subject approach. Economics of Education Review, 30(2), 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shin, H., Jeon, W. T., & Yang, E. B. (2010). Relationship between learning strategies and academic achievement in medical college and graduate medical school students. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 22(3), 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Simsek, A., & Balaban, J. (2010). Learning strategies of successful and unsuccessful university students. Online Submission, 1(1), 36–45.Google Scholar
  40. Teong, S. K. (2003). The effect of metacognitive training on mathematical word‐problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(1), 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vaidya, S. R. (1999). Metacognitive learning strategies for students with learning disabilities. Education, 120(1), 186–190.Google Scholar
  42. Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 359–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63(3), 249–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weinstein, C., & Mayer, R. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315–327). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Wenglinsky, H. (2002). The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10, 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilkinson, L. P. (2015). Ovid recalled. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Yumusak, N., Sungur, S., & Cakiroglu, J. (2007). Turkish high school students’ biology achievement in relation to academic self-regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(1), 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nordin Abd Razak
    • 1
  • Azadeh Shafaei
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Educational StudiesUniversiti Sains MalaysiaMalaysia
  2. 2.School of Educational StudiesUniversiti Sains MalaysiaMalaysia

Personalised recommendations