Advertisement

A Multilevel Analysis of Singaporean Students’ Mathematics Performance in PISA 2012

  • Qian Chen
Chapter
  • 438 Downloads

Abstract

As a top-performing country in international assessments of student achievement (Mullis et al., 2008; Mullis et al., 2012; OECD, 2004, 2010, 2014a), Singapore has aroused great attention among educators, researchers, and policy makers around the world.

Keywords

Mathematics Achievement Mathematics Performance Hierarchical Linear Modelling Analysis OECD Publishing Disciplinary Climate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abd. Ghagar, M. N., Othman, R., & Mohammadpour, E. (2011). Multilevel analysis of achievement in mathematics of Malaysian and Singaporean students. Journal of Educational Psychology and Counseling, 2, 285–304.Google Scholar
  2. Bloom, B. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Borman, G. D., & Dowling, M. (2010). Schools and inequality: A multilevel analysis of Coleman’s equality of educational opportunity data. Teachers College Record, 112(5), 1201–1246.Google Scholar
  4. Cadigan, F., Wei, Y., & Clifton, R. A. (2013). Mathematic achievement of Canadian private school students. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 59(4), 662–673.Google Scholar
  5. Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of learning. Teacher College Record, 64, 723–733.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, Q. (2014). Using TIMSS 2007 data to build mathematics achievement model of fourth graders in Hong Kong and Singapore. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1519–1545. doi: 10.1007/s10763-013-9505-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiu, M. M., & Klassen, R. M. (2010). Relations of mathematics self-concept and its calibration with mathematics achievement: Cultural differences among fifteen-year-olds in 34 countries. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 2–17. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., & Weinfeld, F. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.Google Scholar
  9. Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  10. Güzel, Çİ., & Berberoğlu, G. (2010). Students’ affective characteristics and their relation to mathematical literacy measures in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2003. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 40, 93–113.Google Scholar
  11. Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2006). Gender similarities in mathematics and science. Science Education, 314, 599–600. doi: 10.1126/science.1132154Google Scholar
  12. Ker, H. W. (2015). The impacts of student-, teacher- and school-level factors on mathematics achievement: An exploratory comparative investigation of Singaporean students and the USA students. Educational Psychology, 1–23. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2015.1026801Google Scholar
  13. Lee, J., & Shute, V. J. (2010). Personal and social-contextual factors in K-12 academic peferomance: An integrative perspective on student learning. Educational Psychology, 45(3), 185–202. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2010.493471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leung, F. K. S. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leung, F. K. S. (2006). Mathematics education in East Asia and the West: Does culture matter? In F. K. S. Leung, K.-D. Graf, & F. J. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different culture: A comparative study of East Asia and the West (pp. 21–46). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mohammadpour, E. (2012a). Factors accounting for mathematics achievement of Singaporean eighth-graders. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(3), 507–518.Google Scholar
  17. Mohammadpour, E. (2012b). A multilevel study on trends in Malaysian secondary school students’ science achievement and associated school and student predictors. Science Education, 96(6), 1013–1046. doi: 10.1002/sce.21028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mohammadpour, E. (2013). A three-level multilevel analysis of Singaporean eighth-graders science achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 212–220. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.005Google Scholar
  19. Mohammadpour, E., & Ghafar, M. N. A. (2012). Mathematics achievement as a function of within- and between-school differences. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1–33. doi:  10.1080/00313831.2012.725097Google Scholar
  20. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.Google Scholar
  21. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades.Google Scholar
  22. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.Google Scholar
  23. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.Google Scholar
  24. OECD. (2004). First results from PISA 2003: Executive summary. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 Results: Executive summary. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. OECD. (2013a). PISA 2012 Results: Excellence through equity: Giving every student the chance to succeed (Vol. II). Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. OECD. (2013b). PISA 2012 Results: Ready to learn students’ engagement, drive and self-beliefs (Vol. III). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. OECD. (2013c). PISA 2012 Results: What makes schools successful? Resources, policies and practices (Vol. IV). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. OECD. (2014a). PISA 2012 Results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know: Key results from PISA 2012. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. OECD. (2014b). PISA 2012 technical report. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2012technicalreport.htmGoogle Scholar
  31. Park, K. (2004). Factors contributing to East Asian students’ high achievement: Focusing on East Asian teachers and their teaching. Paper presented at the APEC Educational Reform Summit, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  32. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  33. Rubin, D. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in sample surveys. New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rumberger, R. W., & Palardy, G. J. (2004). Multilevel models for school effectiveness research. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 235–258). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Senler, B., & Sungur, S. (2009). Parental influences on students’ self-concept, task value beliefs, and achievement in science. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 106–117. doi: 10.1017/S1138741600001529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shannag, Q. A., Tairab, H., Dodeen, H., & Abdel-Fattah, F. (2013). Linking teachers’ quality and student achievement in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Singapore: The impact of teachers’ background variables on student achievement. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(5), 652–665.Google Scholar
  37. Shavelson, R. J., McDonnell, L., & Oakes, J. (1991). Steps in designing an indicator system. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2(12). Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=2&n=12
  38. Shin, J., Lee, H., & Kim, Y. (2009). Student and school factors affecting mathematics achievement: International comparisons between Korea, Japan and the USA. School Psychology International, 30(5), 520–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Soh, K. (2013). Finland and Singapore in PISA 2009: Similarities and differences in achievements and school management. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/03057925.2013.787286Google Scholar
  40. Sun, L., Bradley, K. D., & Akers, K. (2012). A multilevel modelling approach to investigating factors impacting science achievement for secondary school students: PISA Hong Kong sample. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2107–2125. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.708063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  42. Teodorović, J. (2012). Student background factors influencing student achievement in Serbia. Educational Studies, 38(1), 89–110. doi: 10.1080/03055698.2011.567027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Toh, K. A., & Pereira-Mendoza, L. (Eds.). (2002). The Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) – A look at Singapore students’ performance and classroom practice. Singapore: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  44. Walberg, H. J. (2003). Improving educational productivity. Washington, DC: Education Resources Information Center.Google Scholar
  45. Wang, Z., Osterlind, S., & Bergin, D. (2012). Building mathematics achievement models in four countries using TIMSS 2003. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(5), 1215–1242. doi: 10.1007/s10763-011-9328-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wößmann, L. (2005). Educational production in East Asia: The impact of family background and schooling policies on student performance. German Economic Review, 6, 331–353. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0475.2005.00136.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wu, M. (2009). A comparison of PISA and TIMSS 2003 achievement results in mathematics. Prospects, 39, 33–46. doi: 10.1007/s11125-009-9109-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang, Y. (2003). Dimensions of socio-economic status and their relationship to mathematics and science achievement at individual and collective Levels. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(1), 21. doi: 10.1080/00313830308609CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qian Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mathematics and Software ScienceSichuan Normal UniversityChina

Personalised recommendations