Notes on Wor(l)dly Becoming with Child/ren/hood(s)

In the Middle of Small Things Writing, Response-Ability and Be-ing-in-Common-Worlds-with
  • Ann Merete Otterstad


In this chapter I want, as I write across and against worldviews on child-natureculture values, refugees, you/me/they/us, green pedagogy, recourses, economy, dark ecology – to elaborate and connect to the notion of the Anthropocene in early years sceneries. My thinking needs to be/come experimental, curious, imaginative, responsible reworking inspirations of knowledge. I am dedicated to ethical and critical analysis and encounters.


Human World Green Pedagogy Early Childhood Curriculum Early Childhood Research Worldly Capitalistic System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alaimo, S., & Heckman, S. (Ed). (2008). Material feminisms. Bloomington, IN & Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, C. E., & Otterstad, A. M. (2014). Researching the assemblage of cultural diversity in Norway: Challenging simplistic research approaches. Review of Qualitative Research, 7(1), 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC & London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187. doi: 10.1080/13534645.2014.927623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Buchanan, I. (2015). Assemblage theory and its discontents. Deleuze Studies, 9(3), 382–392. Retrieved from Scholar
  7. Davies, H., & Turpin, E. (Ed). (2015). Art in the anthropocene. London: Open Humanities Press. Retrieved from Scholar
  8. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  9. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? New York, NY: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fincher, B. (2015). In K. Gibson, D. Rose, & B. Fincher (Eds.), Manifesto for the living in the anthropocene (pp. 29–42). Brooklyn, NY: Punctum Books. Retrieved from
  11. Giugni, M. (2010). ‘Becoming worldly with’: An encounter with the early years learning framework. Contemporary Issues of Early childhood, 12(1), 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  13. Haraway, D. (2010). When species meet: Staying with the trouble. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(1), 53–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haraway, D. (2015a). Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, chthulucene. Donna Haraway in conversation with Martha Kenney. In H. Davies & E. Turpin (Eds.), Art in the anthropocene (pp. 255–270). London: Open Humanities Press. Retrieved from Scholar
  15. Haraway, D. (2015b). Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities, 6, 159–165. Retrieved from Scholar
  16. Hird, M. (2009). The origins of sociable life: Evolution after science studies. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hird, M. (2010). Coevolution, symbiosis and sociology. Ecological Economics, 69(4), 737–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ingold, T. (2007). Lines: A brief history. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Instone, L. (2015). Risking attachment in the Anthropocene. In K. Gibson, D. B. Rose, & B. Fincher (Eds.), Manifesto for the living in the Anthropocene (pp. 29–42). Brooklyn, NY: Punctum Books. Retrieved from Scholar
  20. Latour, B. (2004). How to talk about the body: The normative dimension of science studies. Body & Society, 10, 205–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Latour, B. (2005a). What is given in experience? A review of Isabelle Stengers’ Penser avec White-head. Boundary 2, 32(1), 222–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Latour, B. (2005b). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Latour, B. (2014). Another way to compose the common world. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee, J., & Ingold, T. (2006). Fieldwork on foot. In S. Coleman & P. Collins (Eds.), Locating the field: Space, place and context in anthropology (pp. 67–85). London: Berg.Google Scholar
  25. Manning, E. (2015). Mot Metode (Against Method) (A. B. Reinertsen, Trans.). In A. M. Otterstad & A. B. Reinertsen (Eds.), Metodefest og øyeblikksrealisme [Methodfestival and moments of realism] (pp. 121–132). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  26. Massumi, B. (2008). The thinking-feeling of what happens. Inflexions. Retrieved from Scholar
  27. Morton, T. (2010). The ecological thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Morton, T. (2013). Realist magic: Objects, ontology, causality. London: Open Humanities Press. (An imprint of MPublishing, University of Michigan Library, Ann Arbor.)Google Scholar
  29. Nancy, J.-L. (2000). Being singular plural (R. Richardson & A. O’Byrne, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Nordstrom, S. N. (2015). A data assemblage. International Review of Qualitative Research, 8(2), 166–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Otterstad, A. M., & Nordbrønd, B. (2015). Posthumanisme1/nymaterialisme og nomadisme – Affektive brytninger av barnehagens observasjonspraksiser (Posthumanism,/newmaterialism and nomadism). Nordisk Barnehageforskning/Journal of Nordic Early Childhood Research, 11(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  32. Reinertsen, A. B., Otterstad, A. M., & Ben-Horin, O. (2014). Our little land and the urgency of showing, not telling, our subjectivities. Policy Futures in Education, 12(1), 137–148. doi: 10.2304/pfie.2014.12.1.137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stengers, I. (2011). Thinking with whitehead: A free and wild creation of concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Taylor, A., & Blaise, M. (2014). Queer worlding childhood. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(6), 1–16. Retrieved from Scholar
  35. Taylor, A., & Pacini- Ketchabaw, V. (2015). Learning with children, ants, and worms in the Anthropocene: Towards a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(4), 507–529. doi: 10.1080/14681366.2015.1039050Google Scholar
  36. Thrift, N. J. (2008). Non-representational theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Vannini, P. (2014). Non-representational ethnography: New ways of animating lifeworlds. Cultural Geographies, 20, 1–11. doi: 10.1177/1474474014555657Google Scholar
  38. Waterhouse, A.-H., & Otterstad, A. M. (2015). Beyond regimes of signs: Making art/istic portrayals of haptic moments/movements with child/ren/hood. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2015.1075727Google Scholar
  39. Whitehead, A. N. (1920). Theories of the bifurcation of Nature. In The concept of nature (pp. 26–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann Merete Otterstad
    • 1
  1. 1.Oslo and Akershus University CollegeNorway

Personalised recommendations