Advertisement

Thinking Sensing Livingloving and Becoming Earth

This Posthumanist Research(er)
  • Hanna Ellen Guttorm
Chapter

Abstract

Here, in this, ‘I’-and-the-multiple-others fumble, move, think, ask, become and write smoothly towards a posthuman (re)search, (re)think, Life with constant searching, thinking, becoming, not-knowing. Towards a living Being, where humanist epistemologies and human are decentered … Towards becoming-imperceptible (no ‘as a’ researcher/expert/anything-else anymore) … Towards an affirmative present.

Keywords

Imperial Position Material Configuration Utopian Imagination Material Entanglement Live Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings, and justice-to-come. Derrida Today, 3.2, 240–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC & London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Blyth, I., & Sellers, S. (2004). Cixous live. In H. Cixous (Ed.), Live theory. London & New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  5. Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge & Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Caldwell, R. (2007). Thinking the impossible. Retrieved April, 14, 2015, from https://philosophynow.org/issues/60/Derrida_Thinking_The_Impossible
  7. Coleman, R., & Ringrose, J. (2013). Introduction. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Ed.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 1–22). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Deleuze, G. (1983). Nietzsche and philosophy (H. Tomlinson, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1962)Google Scholar
  9. Deleuze, G. (2004). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). London: Continuum. (Original work published 1968)Google Scholar
  10. Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2002). Dialogues (H. Tomlinson, B. Habberjam, & E. R. Albert, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1977)Google Scholar
  11. Derrida, J., & Ferraris, M. (2001). A taste for the secret (G. Donis, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press. (Original work published 1997)Google Scholar
  12. Guttorm, H. (2014). Sommitelmia ja kiepsahduksia: Nomadisia kirjoituksia tutkimuksen tulemisesta (ja käsityön sukupuolisopimuksesta). Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto.Google Scholar
  13. Guttorm, H. E. (2015). Assemblages and swing-arounds: Becoming a dissertation, or putting poststructural theories to work in research writing. Qualitative Inquiry.Google Scholar
  14. Guttorm, H. E., Löytönen, T., Anttila, E., & Valkeemäki, A. (2014). Mo(ve)ments, encounters, repetitions: Writing with (Embodied and Textual) encounters. Qualitative Inquiry.Google Scholar
  15. Ikävalko, E., & Kurki, T. (2013). Tutkimuksen rajoilla kuljeskellen. Teoksessa Brunila, K. & Isopahkala-Bouret, U. (toim.): Marginaalin voima! Aikuiskasvatuksen 51. vuosikirja. Kansanvalistusseura ja Aikuiskasvatuksen tutkimusseura.Google Scholar
  16. Law, J. (2004). After method. Mess in social science research. London & New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Löytönen, T., Anttila, E., Guttorm, H., & Valkeemäki, A. (2014). Playing with patterns: Fumbling towards collaborative and embodied writing. International Review of Qualitative Inquiry, 7(2), 236–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act. Passages in the ecology of experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reinertsen, A. (2013). Come on dear gal: On learning democracies; Mygazes, mymethods, mylanguages, myforces, and mychanges. Cultural Studies/Critical Methodologies, 13(6), 562–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reinertsen, A. B., Ben-Horin, O., & Borgenvik, K. (2014). Articlepoem. Poetry and reality in research in poetry and reality. International Review of Qualitative Inquiry, 7(4), 465–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. St. Pierre, E. A. (2004). Deleuzian concepts for education: The subject undone. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(3), 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). The posts continue: Becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 646–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham, NC & London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Taylor, D. (2014). Uncertain ontologies. Foucault Studies, 17, 117–133.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanna Ellen Guttorm
    • 1
  1. 1.Sámi University CollegeKautokeinoNorway

Personalised recommendations