Advertisement

Becoming Earth pp 113-121 | Cite as

A Practice in Materialized Refiguration

A Modest Attempt in Making a Difference
  • Liz Jones
Chapter
  • 379 Downloads

Abstract

‘The point’, as Donna Haraway (1994) notes, ‘is to get at how worlds are made and unmade, in order to participate in the processes, in order to foster some forms of life and not others’ (1994, p. 59). Taking a modest and humble stone as my point of departure this chapter will undertake what Haraway describes as materialized refiguaration (1994, p. 59), a practice that allows me to retrace my footsteps as I retrospectively reconsider data that emerged from an ethnographic project located in an inner city kindergarten in a northern English city.

Keywords

Foster Parent Ethnographic Data Poststructuralist Theory Feminist Poststructuralism Ethnographic Field Note 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Badmington, N. (2011). Posthumanism. In B. Clarke & M. Rossini (Eds.), Routledge companion to science and literature. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braidotti, R. (2009). Meta(l)flesh. In Z. J. Playdon (Ed.), The future of flesh. A cultural survey of the body (pp. 241–261). New York, NY: Palgrove Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, T., & Jones, L. (2001). Action research and postmodernism: Congruence and critique. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Boutang, P. A. (Director). (2011). Gilles Deleuze from A to Z: An interview with Claire Parnet [DVD]. (C. J. Stivale, Trans.).Google Scholar
  7. Deleuze, G., Guattari, F., & Brinkley, R. (1983). What is a minor literature? Mississippi Review, 11(3), 13–33.Google Scholar
  8. Deleuze, G. (2005). Cinema I. London: Continuum. (First published 1986)Google Scholar
  9. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  10. Grosz, E. (2008). Chaos, territory, art: Deleuze and the framing of the earth. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Haraway, D. (1994). A game of cat’s cradle: Science studies, feminist theory, cultural studies. Configurations, 2(1), 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  13. Holmes, R., & Jones, L. (in press). Flickering, spilling and diffusing body/knowledge in the posthuman early years. In C. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, E. (1999). Critical pedagogy: An impossible task (PhD thesis). Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, England.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, L. (1995, March). Wanted, new scripts for boys’ play. Language and Learning, 6–8.Google Scholar
  16. Jones, L. (1996). Young girls’ notions of femininity. Gender and Education, 8(3), 311–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones, L. (2001). Trying to break bad habits in practice by engaging with poststructuralist theories. Early Years, 21(1), 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones, L., & Brown, T. (2002). Reading the nursery classroom: A Foucauldian perspective. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(6), 713–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. King, H. (2004). Free indirect affect in Cassavetes’ opening night and faces. Camera Obscura, 19(2/56), 105–139. doi: 10.1215/02705346-19-2_56-105. Accessed September 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MacLure, M. (2011). Qualitative inquiry: Where are the ruins? Qualitative Inquiry, 17(10), 997–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rautio, P. (2013). Children who carry stones in their pockets: On autotelic material practices in everyday life. Children’s Geographies, 11(4), 394–408. Retrieved September, 2015, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2013.812278Google Scholar
  24. Tompkins, S. (1995). Exploring affect: The selected writings of Silvan S. Tompkins (Virginia E. Demos, Ed.). New York, NY: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  25. Zepke, S., & O’Sullivan, S. (2010). Deleuze and contemporary art. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liz Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.The Hong Kong Institute of EducationHong Kong

Personalised recommendations