Skip to main content

A World in Transition

A Study of Brecht’s A Man’s a Man

  • Chapter
A Play Analysis
  • 477 Accesses

Abstract

Brecht had to reject such a concept because it is also rooted in the idea of an unchangeable world. The drama of Renaissance and classicism accepts the world as it is, and the focus of this drama becomes a man’s suffering because of his flaws, because of “human nature.” Man may change at the end of the great Western tragedies in the sense that he learns something significant about himself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Benjamin, W. (1973). Understanding brecht 1966 (A. Bostock, Trans.). London, UK: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, E. (1987). The Brecht commentaries, 1943–1986. New York, NY: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, E. (2008). Bentley on Brecht. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H. (Ed.). (2002). Bloom’s major dramatists: Bertolt Brecht. Philadelphia, PA: Chelsea House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecht, B. (1964). Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic (J. Willett, Trans. Ed.). New York, NY: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecht, B. (1967). Gesammelte werke [Collected Works] (Vol. 20). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecht, B. (1977). A man’s a man. In R. Manheim J. Willett (Eds.), Brecht’s collected plays (1970–2004) (G. Nellhaus, Trans., Vol. 2 of 9, pp. 1–70). London, UK: Methuen Drama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecht, B. (2003). In T. Kuhn S. Giles (Eds.), Bertolt Brecht on art and politics. London, UK: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demetz, P. (Ed.). (1962). Brecht: A collection of critical essays. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, K. A. (1978). Towards utopia: A study of Brecht. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esslin, M. (1984). Brecht, a choice of evils: A critical study of the man, his work, and his opinions (4th Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewen, F. (1967). Bertolt Brecht: His life, his art, and his times. New York, NY: Citadel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuegi, J. (1972). The essential Brecht. Los Angeles, CA: Hennessey and Ingalls.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuegi, J. (1987). Bertolt Brecht: Chaos, according to plan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glahn, P. (2014). Bertolt Brecht. London, UK: Reaktion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. D. (1976). Brecht the dramatist. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayman, R. (1983). Brecht: A biography. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. (1975). Bertolt Brecht. Boston, MA: Twayne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, C. R. (1968). Bertolt Brecht: The despair and the polemic. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mews, S. (Ed.). (1989). Critical essays on Bertolt Brecht. Boston, MA: G. K. Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mews, S. (Ed.). (1997). A Bertolt Brecht reference companion. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mews, S., Knust, H. (Eds.). (1974). Essays on Brecht: Theater and politics. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. (2009). Bertolt Brecht. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needle, J., Thomson, P. (1981). Brecht. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokel, W. (1971, Fall). Brecht’s concept of character. Comparative Drama, 5(3), 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speirs, R. (1987). Bertolt Brecht. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suvin, D. (1984). To Brecht and beyond: Soundings in modern dramaturgy. Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, P., Sacks, G. (Eds.). (2006/1994). The Cambridge companion to Brecht. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willett, J. (1977). The theatre of Bertolt Brecht: A study from eight aspects 1968. London, UK: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willett, J. (1998/1984). Brecht in context: Comparative approaches. London, UK: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cardullo, R.J. (2015). A World in Transition. In: A Play Analysis. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-280-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics