Abstract
Brecht had to reject such a concept because it is also rooted in the idea of an unchangeable world. The drama of Renaissance and classicism accepts the world as it is, and the focus of this drama becomes a man’s suffering because of his flaws, because of “human nature.” Man may change at the end of the great Western tragedies in the sense that he learns something significant about himself.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Benjamin, W. (1973). Understanding brecht 1966 (A. Bostock, Trans.). London, UK: New Left Books.
Bentley, E. (1987). The Brecht commentaries, 1943–1986. New York, NY: Grove Press.
Bentley, E. (2008). Bentley on Brecht. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Bloom, H. (Ed.). (2002). Bloom’s major dramatists: Bertolt Brecht. Philadelphia, PA: Chelsea House.
Brecht, B. (1964). Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic (J. Willett, Trans. Ed.). New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
Brecht, B. (1967). Gesammelte werke [Collected Works] (Vol. 20). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Brecht, B. (1977). A man’s a man. In R. Manheim J. Willett (Eds.), Brecht’s collected plays (1970–2004) (G. Nellhaus, Trans., Vol. 2 of 9, pp. 1–70). London, UK: Methuen Drama.
Brecht, B. (2003). In T. Kuhn S. Giles (Eds.), Bertolt Brecht on art and politics. London, UK: Methuen.
Demetz, P. (Ed.). (1962). Brecht: A collection of critical essays. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hal.
Dickson, K. A. (1978). Towards utopia: A study of Brecht. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Esslin, M. (1984). Brecht, a choice of evils: A critical study of the man, his work, and his opinions (4th Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Methuen.
Ewen, F. (1967). Bertolt Brecht: His life, his art, and his times. New York, NY: Citadel.
Fuegi, J. (1972). The essential Brecht. Los Angeles, CA: Hennessey and Ingalls.
Fuegi, J. (1987). Bertolt Brecht: Chaos, according to plan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Glahn, P. (2014). Bertolt Brecht. London, UK: Reaktion.
Gray, R. D. (1976). Brecht the dramatist. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hayman, R. (1983). Brecht: A biography. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hill, C. (1975). Bertolt Brecht. Boston, MA: Twayne.
Lyons, C. R. (1968). Bertolt Brecht: The despair and the polemic. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Mews, S. (Ed.). (1989). Critical essays on Bertolt Brecht. Boston, MA: G. K. Hall.
Mews, S. (Ed.). (1997). A Bertolt Brecht reference companion. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Mews, S., Knust, H. (Eds.). (1974). Essays on Brecht: Theater and politics. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Mumford, M. (2009). Bertolt Brecht. London, UK: Routledge.
Needle, J., Thomson, P. (1981). Brecht. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Sokel, W. (1971, Fall). Brecht’s concept of character. Comparative Drama, 5(3), 177–192.
Speirs, R. (1987). Bertolt Brecht. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
Suvin, D. (1984). To Brecht and beyond: Soundings in modern dramaturgy. Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble.
Thomson, P., Sacks, G. (Eds.). (2006/1994). The Cambridge companion to Brecht. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Willett, J. (1977). The theatre of Bertolt Brecht: A study from eight aspects 1968. London, UK: Methuen.
Willett, J. (1998/1984). Brecht in context: Comparative approaches. London, UK: Methuen.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cardullo, R.J. (2015). A World in Transition. In: A Play Analysis. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-280-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-280-6_11
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-280-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)