Skip to main content

We are not “Cordwood”

Critical Stories and the Two-Tier System in U.S. Higher Education

  • Chapter
  • 342 Accesses

Part of the book series: Constructing Knowledge: Curriculum Studies in Action ((CKCS))

Abstract

In a recent department faculty meeting, an endowed White male professor commented that the majority of students were “cordwood.” As an adjunct professor, I found that his comments bothered me. Is it possible he considered adjuncts—the majority of faculty who teach our nation’s undergraduate students (Kezar, 2012)—as expendable objects too? The New Oxford American Dictionary defines “cordwood” as wood that has been cut into uniform lengths, used especially for fires.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hensley, B.O. (2015). We are not “Cordwood”. In: Hartlep, N.D., Hensley, B.O. (eds) Critical Storytelling in Uncritical Times. Constructing Knowledge: Curriculum Studies in Action. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-256-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics