Advertisement

Constructing and Negotiating a Residency Admissions Program in the Third Space

  • Emily J. Klein
  • Monica Taylor
  • Dave Koethe
  • Marc Kolb
  • Walter Kaczka
Chapter
  • 229 Downloads
Part of the Bold Visions in Educational Research book series (BVER)

Abstract

Our first face-to-face experience with 25 applicants. The atmosphere is electric, filled with nervous energy, anticipation, and enthusiasm. We gather together in one of the classrooms in University Hall, bringing together applicants, faculty, NPS mentors, and HR personnel to determine cohort two. The evaluation process begins from the moment the group congregates, as we connect faces and names to application files.

Keywords

Preservice Teacher Content Knowledge Pedagogical Content Knowledge Teacher Education Program Urban School 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achinstein, B., & Ogawa, R. (2006). (In)Fidelity: What the resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies. Harvard Educational Review, 76(1), 30–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballou, D., & Podgursky, M. (1995). Recruiting smarter teachers. The Journal of Human Resources, 30(2), 326–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baskin, M. K., Ross, S. M., & Smith, D. L. (1996). Selecting successful teachers: The predictive validity of the urban teacher selection interview. The Teacher Educator, 32, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brantlinger, A., & Smith, B. (2013). Alternative teacher certification and the new professionalism: The pre-service preparation of mathematics teachers in the New York City teaching fellows program. Teachers College Record, 115, 1–44.Google Scholar
  5. Casey, C. E., & Childs, R. A. (2007). Teacher education program admission criteria and what beginning teachers need to know to be successful teachers. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 67, 1–24.Google Scholar
  6. Caskey, M. M., Peterson, K. D., & Temple, J. B. (2001). Complex admission selection procedures for a graduate preservice teacher education program. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37, 7–21.Google Scholar
  7. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2004). Practitioner inquiry, knowledge, and university culture. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of research of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 601–650). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Press.Google Scholar
  8. Crawford-Garrett, K. (2013). Teach for America and the struggle for urban school reform: Searching for agency in an era of standardization. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. D’Agostino, J. V., & Powers, S. J. (2009). Predicting teacher performance with test scores and gradepoint average: A meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 146–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeLuca, C. (2012). Selecting inclusive teacher candidates: Validity and reliability issues in admission policy and practice. Teacher Education Quarterly, 39(4), 7–32.Google Scholar
  11. Denner, P. R., Salzman, S. A., & Newsome, J. D. (2001). Selecting the qualified: A standards-based teacher education admission process. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15, 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dobbie, W. (2011). Teacher characteristics and student achievement: Evidence from teach for America (Monograph). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/teacherbeat/teachercharacteristicsjuly2011.pdfGoogle Scholar
  13. Falkenberg, T. (2010). Admission to teacher education programs: The problem and two approaches to addressing it. Canadian Journal of Education Administration Policy, 107, 1–29.Google Scholar
  14. Firestone, W. A., & Pennell, J. R. (1993). Teacher commitment, working conditions, and differential incentive policies. Review of Educational Research, 63(4), 489–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman, D., Martin, R., Brousseau, B., & West, B. (1989). Do higher program admission standard alter profiles of entering teacher candidates? Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frey, P. (2003). Ability of the urban teacher selection interview to identify teachers who are likely to be retained in the Buffalo public schools (Doctoral dissertation, Accession order no. UMI 3130117). South Orange, NJ: Seton Hall University.Google Scholar
  17. Ginsberg, R., & Whaley, D. (2003). Admission and retention policies in teacher preparation programs: Legal and practical issues. The Teacher Educator, 38, 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haberman, M. (1988). Proposals for recruiting minority Martin Haberman teachers: Promising practices and attractive detours. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haberman, M. (1995). Star teachers of children in poverty. West Lafayette, IN: Kappa Delta Pi International Honor Society in Education.Google Scholar
  20. Harrison, J., Smithy, G., McAffee, H., & Weiner, C. (2006). Assessing candidate disposition for admission into teacher education: Can just anyone teach? Action in Teacher Education, 27, 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kennedy, H. L. (2000). Assessing preservice teachers: Developing and implementing a model. Contemporary Education, 71(2), 42–51.Google Scholar
  22. Kennedy, M., Ball, D., & McDiarmid, G. W. (1993). A study package for examining and tracking changes in teachers’ knowledge (Technical Series 93–1). East Lansing, MI: The National Center for Research on Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  23. Kent, A. (2005). Acknowledging the need facing teacher preparation programs: Responding to make a difference. Education, 125(3), 343–348.Google Scholar
  24. Klussmann, D. F. (2004). The impact of teachers selected by the star teacher interview process on student achievement (Doctoral dissertation, Accession order no. 3130126). South Orange, NJ: Seton Hall University. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.Google Scholar
  25. Kosnick, C., Brown, R., & Beck, C. (2005) The preservice admissions process: What qualities do future teachers need and how can they be identified in applicants? The New Educator, 1(2) 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Larkin, D., Robinson, J., & Perry-Ryder, G. (2014). Evidence for growth in secondary science residents’ knowledge for teaching in an urban teacher residency. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  27. Memory, D. M., Coleman, C. L., & Watkins, S. D. (2003). Possible tradeoffs in raising basic skills cutoff scores for teacher licensure: A study with implications for participation of African Americans in teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(3), 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Montclair State University. Portrait of a teacher. Retrieved from http://www.montclair.edu/cehs/academics/departments/ecele/about/portrait-teacher/
  29. Oakes, J., Franke, M., Quartz, K. H., & Rogers, J. (2002). Research for high-quality urban teaching: Defining it, developing it, assessing it. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 228–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pillow-Price, K. (2003). An evaluation of the Haberman urban teacher selection interview in rural settings (Doctoral dissertation, Accession Order No. 3323288). Jonesboro, AR: Arkansas State University. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.Google Scholar
  31. Quirk, T. J., Witten, B. J., & Weinberg, S. F. (1973). Review of studies of the concurrent and predictive validity of the national teacher examinations. Review of Education Research, 43(1), 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roth, P. L., BeVier, C. A., Switzer, F. S., & Schippmann, J. S. (1996). Meta-analyzing the relationship between grades and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 548–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schectman, Z. (1988). Agreement between lay participants and professional assessors: Support of a group assessment procedure for selection purposes. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith, H. A., & Pratt, D. (1996). The use of biodata in admissions to teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Taylor, A., & Frankenberg, E. (2009). Exploring urban commitment of graduates from an urban-focused teacher education program. Equity & Excellence in Education, 42(3), 327–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Taylor, M., Klein, E. J., Strom, K., & Abrams, L. (2011). Finding a third space in teacher education: Creating an urban teacher residency with Montclair State University and the Newark public schools. In S. Dickstein (Chair.), Developing and sustaining UTRs: How do we provide effective preparation experiences and build resident efficacy? Paper presented in symposium at the American Educational Research Association conference, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  37. Taylor, M., Klein, E. J., Strom, K., & Abrams, L. (2012). A year in the third space: The praxis of inquiry. In M. Taylor & K. Strom (Chairs), Urban teacher residencies, year one: Looking across models and contexts. Paper presented in symposium at the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  38. Taylor, M., Klein, E. J., & Abrams, L. (2014). Tensions of re-imagining our roles as teacher educators in a third space: Revisiting a co/autoethnography through a faculty lens. Studying Teacher Education, 10(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Teach For America | Home. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.teachforamerica.org/
  40. Veltri, B. T. (2010). Learning on other people’s kids: Becoming a teach for America teacher. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Wasicsko, M., Wirtz, P., & Resor, C. (2009). Using dispositions in the teacher admission process. SRATE Journal, 18(2), 19–26.Google Scholar
  42. Zeichner, K. M. (2003). The adequacies and inadequacies of three current strategies to recruit, prepare, and retain the best teachers for all students. Teachers College Record, 105(3), 490–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emily J. Klein
    • 1
  • Monica Taylor
    • 2
  • Dave Koethe
    • 3
  • Marc Kolb
    • 4
  • Walter Kaczka
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Secondary and Special EducationMontclair State UniversityMontclairNew Jersey
  2. 2.Department of Secondary and Special EducationMontclair State UniversityMontclairNew Jersey
  3. 3.Retired Science Department ChairUniversity High SchoolNewarkNew Jersey
  4. 4.East Side High SchoolNewarkNew Jersey
  5. 5.Florence Township Memorial High SchoolFlorenceNew Jersey

Personalised recommendations