Advertisement

Training Scientists to Communicate Science to the Public in a Science Museum Setting

Chapter
  • 660 Downloads

Abstract

Science communication refers to a wide variety of communication processes relevant to science. These range from communication among experts within specialties, to the mediated or direct communication of science to lay audiences, to the influence of messages on science policy (Dunwoody, 2010). Science communication has become a part of the social life of the scientific community.

Keywords

Pedagogical Content Knowledge Informal Learning Training Workshop Science Museum Training Scientist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, J. D. (2012). From campus to classroom: A study of elementary teacher candidates’ pedagogical content knowledge (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://circule.ubc.caGoogle Scholar
  2. Barriault, C., & Pearson, D. (2010). Assessing exhibits for learning in science centers: A practical tool. Visitor Studies, 13(1), 90–106. doi: 10.1080/10645571003618824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barron, B. J., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A. J., Zech, L., …The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 271–311.Google Scholar
  4. Baum, R. M. (2012). Science communication. Chemical & Engineering News, 90(22), 5.Google Scholar
  5. Besley, J. C., & Tanner, A. H. (2011). What science communication scholars think about training scientists to communicate. Science Communication, 33(2), 239–263. doi: 10.1177/1075547010386972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bevan, B., & Xanthoudaki, M. (2008). Professional development for museum educators: Unpinning the underpinnings. Journal of Museum Education, 33(1), 107–120.Google Scholar
  7. Bubela, T., Hyde-Lay, R., Jandciu, E. W., Jones, S. A., Kolopack, P., Lane, S., … Gaulfield, T. (2009). Science communication reconsidered. Nature Biotechnology, 27(6), 514–518. doi: 10.1038/nbt0609–514
  8. Castle, M. C. (2006). Blending pedagogy and content: A new curriculum for museum teachers. The Journal of Museum Education, 31(2), 123–132.Google Scholar
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Davies, S., McCallie, E., Simonsson, E., Lehr, J. L., & Duensing, S. (2009). Discussing dialogue: Perspectives on the value of science dialogue events that do not inform policy. Public Understanding of Science, 18(3), 338–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dierking, L., & Falk, J. H. (1994). Family behavior and learning in informal science settings: A review of the research. Science Education, 78(1), 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dougherty, K., Oliver, C., & Fergusson, J. (2014). Pathways to space: A mission to foster the next generation of scientists and engineers. Acta Astronautica, 99, 184–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunwoody, S. (2010). Science communication. In S. Priest (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science and technology communication (pp. 696–698). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/10.4135/9781412959216Google Scholar
  14. Durant, J. (2010). Public understanding of science. In S. Priest (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science and technology communication (pp. 617–620). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412959216.n213Google Scholar
  15. Erickson, G. (2000). Research programs and the student science learning literature. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contributions of research (pp. 271–292). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experience and the making of meaning. New York, NY: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fischhoff, B., & Scheufele, D. A. (2013). The science of science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(Suppl. 3), 14031–4032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grenier, R. S., & Sheckley, B. (2008). Out on the floor: Experiential learning and the implications for the preparation of docents. The Journal of Museum Education, 33(1), 79–93. doi: 10.1179/jme.2008.33.1.79Google Scholar
  19. Hein, G. E. (1998). Learning in the museum. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Hubard, O. (2011). Illustrating interpretive inquiry: A reflection for art museum education. Curator, 54(2), 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lunenberg, M., Korthagen, F., & Swennen, A. (2007). The teacher educator as a role model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 586–601. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nathan, M. J., & Petrosino, A. (2003). Expert blind spot among preservice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 905–928. doi: 10.3102/00028312040004905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Royal Society. (2006). Science communication excellence in science: Survey of factors affecting science communication by scientists and engineers. London, UK: Royal Society.Google Scholar
  24. Science World. (n.d.a). Are you a scientist seeking to share your research and work with your community? Vancouver, BC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.scienceworld.ca/sites/default/files/community%20scientist%20opportunity%20-%20general.pdf
  25. Science World. (n.d.b). CSI program workshops handouts. Vancouver, BC: Author.Google Scholar
  26. Selvakumar, M., & Storksdieck, M. (2013). Portal to the public: Museum educators collaborating with scientists to engage museum visitors with current science. Curator: The Museum Journal, 56(1), 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sharp, M. (2010). Experiential learning. In T. Hunt, J. Carper, T. Lasley, & C. Raisch (Eds.), Encyclopedia of educational reform and dissent (pp. 360–363). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/10.4135/9781412957403.n162Google Scholar
  28. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tran, L. U., & King, H. (2007). The professionalization of museum educators: The case of science museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 22(2), 131–149. doi: 10.1080/09647770701470328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Webb, A. B., Fetsch, C. R., Israel, E., Roman, C. M., Encarnación, C. H., Zacks, J. M., … Herzog, E. D. (2012). Training scientists in a science center improves science communication to the public. Advances in Physiology Education, 36(1), 72.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wei Hu
    • 1
  1. 1.Coast Mountain Publishing & Media Management CorporationVancouver

Personalised recommendations