Skip to main content

Sustainability, Immanence and the Monstrous in Caryl Hurchill’s the Skriker

  • Chapter
Planetary Praxis & Pedagogy
  • 310 Accesses

Abstract

This paper investigates how a variety of issues raised during the course of a Canadian university-based theatre production of English author Caryl Churchill’s play The Skriker (1994) can contribute to the discussion of the role of creative practice in environmental education. Immanentist perspectives on embodied performance practice and on the environment, informed by the work of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, will be foregrounded in a discussion of the play, its rehearsal, and some potential implications of its staging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Braidotti, R. (2008). The ethics of becoming imperceptible. Retrieved December 13, 2013 from http://deleuze.tausendplateaus.de/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/trent-final.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. (2003). Performance: A critical introduction. New York, NY and London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, S. (2006). Brecht and critical theory: Dialectics and contemporary aesthetics. New York, NY and London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, C. (1994). The Skriker. New York, NY: Theatre Communications Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, C. (1996). Mad forest: A play from Romania. New York, NY: Theatre Communications Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, C. (2010). Cloud nine. New York, NY: Samuel French.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, C. (2013a). Top girls. London, UK: Methuen Drama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, C. (2013b). Top girls in Churchill plays 2. London, UK: Methuen Drama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L., & Santos, C. (2010). The monster imagined: Humanity’s recreation of monsters and the monstrous. Witney, UK: Inter-Disciplinary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2004). The logic of sense. London, UK: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Gallagher, K., & Booth, D. (2003). How theatre educates: Convergences and counterpoints with artists, scholars, and advocates. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, P. (2008). Gilles Deleuze and naturalism: A convergence with ecological theory. In B. Herzogenrath (Ed.), An [un]likely alliance: Thinking environment[s] with Deleuze|Guattari (pp. 23–45). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzogenrath, B. (Ed.). (2008). An [un]likely alliance: Thinking environment[s] with Deleuze|Guattari. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, A. (2010). Actor training (2nd ed.). New York, NY and London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, R. (2004). Reading the material theatre. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulak, M. (2008). The rhizomatics of domination: From Darwin to biotechnology. In B. Herzogenrath (Ed.), An [un]likely alliance: Thinking environment[s] with Deleuze|Guattari (pp. 66–83). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavis, P. (1998). Dictionary of the theatre: Terms, concepts, and analysis. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai, A. S. (2004). Of Monsters: Biopower, terrorism and excess in genealogies of monstrosity. Cultural Studies, 18(4), 538–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanislavski, K. (1989). Building a character. New York, NY and London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. (1998). Failure and the limits of representation in the Skriker. In S. Rabillard (Ed.), Essays on Caryl Churchill: Contemporary representations (pp. 174–188). Winnipeg, Canada: Blizzard

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fancy, D. (2015). Sustainability, Immanence and the Monstrous in Caryl Hurchill’s the Skriker. In: Mitchell, R.C., Moore, S.A. (eds) Planetary Praxis & Pedagogy. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-214-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics