Afdal, H. W. (2012). Policy making processes with respect to teacher education in Finland and Norway. Higher Education Online First. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9527-2
Agnoli, S., Mancini, G., Pozzoli, T., Baldaro, B., Russo, P. M., & Surcinelli, P. (2012). The interaction between emotional intelligence and cognitive ability in predicting scholastic performance in schoolaged children. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(5), 660–665.
Anagnostopoulos, D. (2006). “Real students” and “true demotes”: Ending social promotion and the moral ordering of urban high schools. American Educational Research Journal, 43(1), 5.
Anderson, K. J. B. (2012). Science education and test-based accountability: Reviewing their relationship and exploring implications for future policy. Science Education, 96, 104–129.
Areepattamannil, S., & Freeman, J. G. (2008). Academic achievement, academic self- concept, and academic motivation of immigrant adolescents in the greater Toronto area secondary schools. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(4), 700–743.
Aslam, S., & Ahmad, I. (2010). Predictive ability of ability-based versus self-report EI measures for academic performance. Pakistan Journal of Psychology, 41(2), 91–104.
Aydeniz, M., & Southerland, S. A. (2012). A national survey of middle and high school science teachers’ responses to standardized testing: Is Science being devalued in schools. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 233–257.
Bain, S. K., & Bell, S. M. (2004). Social self-concept, social attribtutions, and peer relationships in fourth, fifth and sixth graders who are gifted compared to high achievers. The Gifted Child Quarterley, 48(3), 167–178.
Barone, C., & Ortiz, L. (2010). Overeducation among European university graduates: A comparative analysis of its incidence and the importance of higher education differentiation. Higher Education, 61(3), 325–337. doi: 10.1007/s10734-010-9380-0
Barrow, L. H. (2006). A brief history of inquiry: From Dewey to standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 265–278.
Barrow, L. H. (2010). Encouraging creativity with scientific inquiry. Creative Education, 1, 1–6.
Barrow, M., & Grant, B. (2011). The ‘truth’ of academic development: How did it get to be about ‘teaching and learning’? Higher Education Research and Development, 31(4), 465–477. doi:10.1080/07294360.2011.602393
Batagiannis, S. C. (2007). Leadership guided by courage: A challenge to instantaneous perfection. The Journal of Educational Thought, 41(2), 145–164.
Beres, I., Magyar, T. M., & Turcsanyi-Szabo, M. R. (2012). Towards a personalised, learning style based collaborative blended learning model with individual assessment. Informatics in Education, 11(1), 1–28.
Berlin, J. E. (2009) It’s all a matter of perspective: Student perceptions on the impact of being labeled gifted and talented. Roeper Review, 31, 217–233.
Bexley, E., Arkoudis, S., & James, R. (2012). The motivations, values and future plans of Australian academics. Higher Education [Online First]. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9550-3
Blackmore, J. (2009). Academic pedagogies, quality logics and performative universities: Evaluating teaching and what students want. Studies in Higher Education, 34(8), 857–872.
Boden, M. (2001). Creativity and knowledge. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in Education (pp. 95–102). London, England: Continuum Publishing.
Buck, L. B., Bretz, S. L., & Towns, M. H. (2008). Characterizing the level of inquiry in the undergraduate laboratory. Journal of College Science Teaching, 38(1), 52–58.
Calhoun, C. (2009). Academic freedom: Public knowledge ann the structural transformation of the university. Social Research, 75(2), 561–600.
Chan, D. W. (2003) Dimensions of emotional intelligence and their relationships with social coping among gifted adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32(6), 409–418.
Cheng, L., Fox, J., & Zheng, Y. (2007). Student accounts of the Ontario secondary school literacy test: A case for validation. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(1), 69.
Cheung, H. Y., & Chan, A. W. H. (2009). The effect of education on life satisfaction across countries. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 55(1), 124–136.
Christine, C., & Glenn, E. S. (2007). General, artistic and scientific creativity attributes of engineering and music students. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2–3), 213.
Clegg, P. (2008). Creativity and critical thinking in the globalised university. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(3), 219.
Coates, H., & Goedegebuure, L. (2012). High educ DOI recasting the academic workforce: Why the attractiveness of the academic profession needs to be increased and eight possible strategies for how to go about this from an Australian perspective. Higher Education [Online First]. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9534-3
Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B., Giuliani, S., Luck, M., Underwood, P. S., Schatschneider, C. (2010). Testing the impact of child characteristics × instruction interactions on third graders’ reading comprehension by differentiating literacy instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(3), 189–221. doi: dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.46.3.1
Council_for_the_Australian_Federation. (2007). Federalist paper 2 the future of schooling in Australia revised edition. Department of Premier and Cabinet, Melbourne. Retrieved from http://deta.qld.gov.au/
Creese, A. (2005). Is this content-based language teaching? Linguistics and Education: An International Research Journal, 16(2), 188–204.
Cross, T. L., & Frazier, A. D. (2010) Guiding the psychosocial development of gifted studetns attending specialized residential STEM schools. Roeper Review, 32, 32–41.
Cross, T. L., Cassady, J. C., Dixon, F.A., & Adams, C. M. (2008) The psychology of gifted adolescents as measured by the MMPI-A. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(4), 326–339.
Danzi, J., Reul, K., & Smith, R. (2008). Improving student motivation in mixed ability classrooms using differentiated instruction (Master of Arts in Teaching and Leadership), Saint Xavier University, Chicago, IL.
Dewey, J. (1916). Chapter 23: Vocational aspects of education: Democracy and education. New York, NY: The Free Press.
DiFabio, A., & Palazzeschi, L. (2009). An in-depth look at scholastic success: Fluid intelligence, personality traits or emotional intelligence? Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 581–585. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.12.012
Douglass, J. A., Thomson, G., & Zhao, C.-M. (2012). The learning outcomes race: The value of self-reported gains in large research universities. Higher Education, 64, 317–335. doi: 10.1007/s10734-011-9496-x
Eddles-Hirsch, K., Vialle, W., Rogers, K. B., McCormick, J. (2010). Just challenge those high-ability learners and they’ll be all right! The impact of social context and challenging instruction on the affective development of high-ability studetns. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(1), 106–128.
Fondacaro, M. R., Brank, E. M., Stuart, J., Villanueva-Abraham, S., Luescher, J., & McNatt, P. S. (2006). Identity orientation, voice, and judgments of procedural justice during late adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(6), 987–997.
Frodeman, R. (2011). Interdisciplinary research and academic sustainability: Managing knowledge in an age of accountability. Environmental Conservation, 38(2), 105–112.
Gao, L. (2011). Eclecticism or principled eclecticism. Creative Education, 2(4), 363–369. doi: 10.4236/ce.2011.24051
Garbrecht, L. S. (2006). Schools’ influence on identity formation in a time of change. Educational Researcher, 35(9), 42–48.
Gawlik, M. A., Kearney, C. P., Addonizio, M. F., & LaPlante-Sosnowsky, F. (2010). Teacher quality in michigan: A school-level analysis of the detroit metropolitan region. Education and Urban Society, 44, 412–448. doi: 10.1177/0013124510392568
Geake, J. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2008). Teachers’ negative affect toward academically gifted students. The Gifted Child Quarterley, 52(3), 217–231.
Gemme, B., & Gingras, Y. (2012). Academic careers for graduate students: A strong attractor in a changed environment. Higher Education, 63, 667–683. doi: 10.1007/s10734-011-9466-3
Glazer, E. (2009). Rephrasing the madness and creativity debate: What is the nature of the creativity construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 755–764.
Griffin, T. M., Chavous, T., Cogburn, C., Branch, L., & Sellers, R. (2012). Dimensions of academic contingencies among African American college students. Journal of Black Psychology, 38, 201–229.
Grodsky, E., Warren, J. R., & Felts, E. (2008). Testing and social stratification in American education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 385–404.
Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way: The inspiring future for educational change. San Francisco, CA: Corwin Press.
Harris, K.-L. (2012). A background in science: What science means for Australian society (p. 92). Australian Council of Deans of Science: Centre for Studies in Higher Education, The University of Melbourne.
Hartley, D. (2008). Education, markets and the pedagogy of personalisation. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(4), 365–381.
Hayden, M., & Lam, Q. T. (2007). A 2020 vision for higher education in Vietnam. International Educator, 16(1), 14–17.
Herron, S. (2009). A curious thing happened on the way to constructivism. Journal of College Science Teaching, 38(6), 8.
Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1, 69–82. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2006.09.001
Hilton, M. (2006). Measuring standards in primary English: Issues of validity and accountability with respect to PIRLS and national curriculum test scores. British Educational Research Journal, 32(6), 817–837.
Hogrebe, M., & Tate, W. (2010). School composition and context factors that moderate and predict 10th-grade science proficiency. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1096.
Hornikx, J. (2011). Epistemic authority of professors and researchers: Differential perceptions by students from two cultural-educational systems. Social Psychology and Education, 14, 169–183. doi: 10.1007/s11218-010-9139-6
Huntoon, J., & Baltensperger, B. (2012). Increasing expertise in earth Science education through master’s education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 60(2), 147–158.
Kauffman, J. M., Mock, D. R., Tankersley, M., & Landrum, T. J. (2008). Effective service delivery models. In R. J. Morris & N. Mather (Eds.), Evidence-based interventions for students with learning and behavioral challenges (pp. 359–378). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kelly-Jackson, C. P., & Jackson, T. O. (2011). Meeting their fullest potential: The beliefs and teaching of a culturally relevant science teacher. Creative Education, 2(4), 408–413. doi: 10.4236/ce.2011.24059
Kendall, G. (2002). The crisis in doctoral education: A sociological diagnosis. Higher Education & Development, 21(2), 131–141.
Kessels, U., Rau, M., & Hannover, B. (2006). What goes well with physics? Measuring and altering the image of science. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 761–780.
Kitagawa, F., & Oba, J. (2010). Managing differentiation of higher education system in Japan: Connecting excellence and diversity. Higher Education, 59, 507–524. doi: 10.1007/s10734-009-9262-5
Klavir, R., & Gorodetsky, M. (2011). Features of creativity as expressed in the construction of new analogical problems by intellectually gifted students. Creative Education, 2(3), 164–173. doi: 10.4236/ce.2011.23023
Krause, K.-L. (2012). Addressing the wicked problem of quality in higher education: Theoretical approaches and implications. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(3), 285–297.
Kyriakides, L. (2004). Investigating validity from teachers’ perspectives through their engagement in large-scale assessment: The emergent literacy baseline assessment project. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(2), 143–165.
Lam, Y. Y. (2010). Impact of globalization on higher education: An empirical study of education policy & planning of design education in Hong Kong. International Education Studies, 3(4), 73–86.
Leighton, J. P., Gokiert, R. J., Cor, M. K., & Heffernan, C. (2010). Teacher beliefs about the cognitive diagnostic information of classroom versus large-scale tests: Implications for assessment literacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(1), 7–21.
Linsley, I. (2005). Causes of overeducation in the Australian labour market, department of economics (Research paper 940). Melbourne, Australia: Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne.
Manzo, A. V. (2003). Literacy crisis or Cambrian period? Theory, practice, and public policy implications. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 46(8), 654–661.
Martín, E., Martínez-Arias, R., Marches, A., & Pérez, E. M. (2008). Variables that predict academic achievement in the Spanish compulsory secondary educational system: A longitudinal, multi level analysis. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 400–413.
McBride, J. R., Ysseldyke, J., Milone, M., & Stickney, E. (2010). Technical adequacy and cost benefit of four measures of early literacy. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 252, 189–204.
McCulloch, A., & Thomas, L. (2012). Widening participation to doctoral education and research degrees: A research agenda for an emerging policy issue. Higher Education Research & Development, iFirst, 32(2), 214–227. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2012.662630
McWilliam, E., Poronnik, P., & Taylor, P. G. (2008). Re-designing science pedagogy: Reversing the flight from science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(3), 226–235.
Messinis, G. (2007). Overeducation and overskilling in Australia: Second generation Greek-Australians and Italian-Australians CSES (Working paper no. 37). Melbourne, Australia: Victoria University.
Miller, A. I. (2000). Insights of genius: Imagery and creativity in science and art. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Milliband, D. (2004). Personalised learning: Building a new relationship with schools. Belfast, England: Department for Education and Skills, United Kingdom.
Montt, G. (2011). Cross-national differences in educational acheivement inequality. Sociology of Education, 84(1), 49–68.
Moon, T. R., Brighton, C. M., & Callahan, C. M. (2003). State standardized testing programs: Friend or foe of gifted education? Roeper Review, 25(2), 49–61.
Myer, L. H., & Evans, I. M. (2005). Supporting academic staff: Meeting new expectations in higher education without compromising traditional faculty values. Higher Education Policy, 18, 243–255. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300086
Nadelson, L. S. (2009). How can true inquiry happen in K-16 science education? Science Educator, 18(1), 48.
Nagy, P. (2000). The three roles of assessment: Gatekeeping, accountability, and instructional diagnosis. Canadian Journal of Education, 25(4), 262–279.
Nair, C. S., Bennett, L., & Mertova, P. (2010). Responding to the student voice: A case study of a systematic improvement strategy. The TQM Journal, 22(5), 553–564. doi: 10.1108/17542731011072883
Nancy Butler, S., Hee-Sun, L., & Scott, M. (2003). Research towards an expanded understanding of inquiry science beyond one idealized standard. Science Education, 87(4), 490.
Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. D. (2009). Some student teachers’ conceptions of creativity in school science. Research in Science and Technological Education, 27(1), 45.
Nilsson, M., Östergren, J., Fors, U., Rickenlund, A., Jorfeldt, L., Caidah, K., & Bolinder, G. (2012). Does individual learning styles influence the choice to use a web-based ECG learning programme in a blended learning setting. BMC Medical Education, 12(5), 1–9.
Nowak, J. A. (2007). The problem with using problem-based learning to teach middle school earth/space science in a high stakes testing society. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55(1), 62.
Obamba, M. O., & Mwema, J. K. (2009). Symmetry and asymmetry: New contours, paradigms, and politics in african academic partnerships. Higher Education Policy, 22, 349–371. doi: 10.1057/hep.2009.12
Oprescu, R. (2012). Bridging intellectual capital and the competitiveness of nations. Managing & Marketing Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 7(1), 73–88.
Peter, S. E., Bacon, E., & Dastbaz, M. (2010). Personalised and adaptable learning: Designing the architecture. London, England: Higher Education Academy.
Peterson, J. S., & Ray, K. E. (2006). Bullying and the gifted: Victims, perpetrators, prevalence and effects. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(2), 148–190.
Pyhalto, K., Soini, T., & Pietarinen, J. (2011). A systemic perspective on school reform: Principals’ and chief education officers’ perspectives on school development. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(1), 46–61. doi: 10.1108/09578231111102054
Queensland Studies Authority. (2007). Senior syllabus chemistry 2007. Brisbane, Queensland Australia.
Quinn, M. A., & Rubb, S. (2011). Spouse overeducation and family migration: Evidence form the US. Journal of Family Economic Issues, 32, 36–45.
Quintini, G., & Martin, S. (2006). Starting well or losing their way? The position of youth in the labour market in OECD countries OECD social, employment and migration working papers. Paris, France: Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs.
Ramoniene, L., & Lanskoronskis, M. (2011). Reflection of higher education aspects in the conception of national competitiveness. Baltic Journal of Management, 6(1), 124–139.
Reinheimer, D., & McKenzie, K. (2011). The impact of tutoring on the academic success of undeclared students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(2), 22–36.
Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2009). Myth 1: The gifted and talented constitute one single homogeneous group and giftedness is a way of being that says in the person over time and experiences. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 233–235.
Resh, N. (2009). Justice in grades allocation: Teachers’ perspective social psychology and education. Social Psychology of Education, 12(3), 315–325. doi: 10.1007/s11218-008-9073-z
Rock, M. L., Gregg, M., Ellis, E., & Gable, R. A. (2008). REACH: A framework for differentiating classroom instruction. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), 31–58.
Romanov, D., Tur-Sinae, A., & Eizman, G. (2008). Overeducation, job mobility, and earnings mobility among holders of first degrees in Israel. Central Bureau of Statistics, Working paper.
Rowlands, S. (2011). Discussion article: Disciplinary boundaries for creativity. Creative Education, 2(1), 47–55. doi: 10.4236/ce.2011.21007
Rubin, J. (2008). Judging our students-keeping it just: The theorem of intellectual measure. Journal of College Admission, 199, 4–11.
Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 243–267.
Runco, M. A., & Okuda, S. M. (1988). Problem discovery, divergent thinking, and the creative process. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17(3), 211–220.
Rushton, S., Mariano, J. M., & Wallace, T. L. (2012). Program selection among pre-service teachers: MBTI profiles within a college of education. Creative Education, 3(1), 16–23. doi: 10.4236/ce.2012.31003
Sampson, D., & Karagianidis, C. (2002). Personalised learning: Educational, technological and standardisation perspective. Interactive Educational Multimedia, 4, 24–39.
Sara, M., David, H., & Anthony, F. (2007). Improvement in national test reading scores at key stage 1; grade inflation or better achievement? British Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 47.
Scager, K., Akkerman, S. F., Keesen, F., Mainhard, M. T., Pilot, A., & Wubbels, T. (2012). Do honors students have more potential for excellence in their professional lives? Higher Education, 64, 19–39. doi: 10.1007/s10734-011-9478-z
Schmidt, A. L. (2010). The battle for creativity: Frontiers in science and science education. BioEssays, 32(12), 1016–1019.
Schmidt, A. L. (2011a). Creativity in science: Tensions between perception and practice. Creative Education, 2(5), 435–445. doi: 10.4236/ce.2011.25063
Schmidt, A. L. (2011b). Discourses of creativity. In E. G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encylopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship. Freiburg, Germany: Springer International.
Schulte, D. P., Schulte, L., Slate, J. R., & Brooks, G. D. (2002). A test-driven accountability system in Texas: Principals’ voices. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in learning, 6(7).
Settlage, J. (2007). Demythologizing science teacher education: Conquering the false ideal of open inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 461–467.
Shay, S. (2012). Educational development as a field: Are we there yet? Higher Education Research & Development, 31(3), 311–323. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2011.631520
Simonton, D. K. (2003b). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 475–494.
Skaar, N. R., & Williams, J. E. (2012). Emotional intelligence as a predictor of adolescent risk behavior participation and perception. Journal on Educational Psychology, 5(4), 32–47.
Stallman, H. (2012). A qualitative evaluation of perceptions of the role of competition in the success and distress of law students. Higher Education Research & Development, iFirst, 31(6), 1–14. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2012.655241
State_of_Queensland. (2002). Queensland the smart state: Education and training reforms for the future, A white paper. Queensland Government. Retrieved from http://www.qld.gov.edu.au
Sweller, J. (2009). Cognitive basis of human creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 11–19.
Taylor, A., Jones, M., Broadwell, B., & Oppewal, T. (2008). Creativity, inquiry, or accountability? Scientists’ and teachers’ perceptions of science education. Science Education, 92(6), 1058.
Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). Mapping a route toward differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership, 59, 12–16.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2000). Reconcilable differences: Standards-based teaching and differentiation. Educational Leadership, 58, 6–11.
Tu, C.-H., Sujo-Montes, L., Yen, C.-J., Chan, J.-Y., & Blocher, M. (2012). The integration of personal learning environments and open network learning environments. TechTrends, 56(3), 13–20.
Tzuriel, D., Bengio, E., & Kashy-Rosenbaum, G. (2011). Cognitive modifiability, emotional–motivational factors, and behavioral characteristics among gifted versus nongifted children. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 10(3), 253–280.
Universities_Australia. (2012). STEM and Non-STEM first year students. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Department of Indistry, innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education.
Verpoorten, D., Renson, J.-M., Westera, W., & Specht, M. (2009). Personalised learning: A familiar concept to teachers? And which teachers? Paper presented at the Making it personal!, Greenwich, England.
Vinkhuyzen, A. A. E., vanderSluis, S., Posthuma, D., & Boomsma, D. I. (2009). The heritability of aptitude and exceptional talent across different domains in adolescents and young adults. Behavioural Genetics, 39, 380–392.
Volante, L., & Ben Jaafar, S. (2008). Educational assessment in Canada. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 15(2), 201–210.
vonStumm, S., & Furnham, A. F. (2012). Learning approaches: Associations with typical intellectual engagement, intelligence and the big five. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 720–723.
Whitchurch, C. (2012). Expanding the parameters of academia. Higher Education, 64, 99–117.
William, A. S. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634.
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941.
Woitaszewski, S. A., & Aalsma, M. C. (2004) The contribution of emotional intelligence to the social and academic success of gifted adolescents as measured by the multifactor emotional intelligence scale – Adolescent version. Roeper Review, 27(1), 25–30.
Wu, P.-L., & Chiou, W.-B. (2008). Postformal thinking and creativity among late adolescents: A post-Piagetian Approach. Adolescence, 43(170), 237–251.