‘A Picture Tells More than a Thousand Words’

Drawings Used as Research Method
  • Eva Alerby
Part of the Transgressions: Cultural Studies and Education book series (TRANS, volume 107)

Abstract

‘A picture tells more than a thousand words’, is a common saying. Given that a picture tells more than a thousand words – how can we understand and use this expression? How can a picture, or an image, be analysed and used as part of educational research? In this chapter the use of images, and more specifically drawings, will be explored.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alerby, E. (1998). Att fånga en tanke. En fenomenologisk studie av barns och ungdomars tänkande kring miljö. [To grasp a thought. A phenomenological study of childrens thoughts about the environment]. PhD thesis. Luleå tekniska universitet.Google Scholar
  2. Alerby, E. (2000). A way of visualising children’s and young people’s thoughts about the environment: A study of drawings. Environmental Education Research, 6(3), 205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alerby, E. (2003). During the break we have fun: A study concerning pupils’ experience of school. Educational Research, 45(1), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alerby, E. (2008). In school you learn to get on in life: Sámi children in Sweden. In E. Alerby & J. Brown (Eds.), Voices from the margins: School experiences of indigenous, refugee and migrant children. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Alerby, E. (2012). Om tystnad – I pedagogiska sammanhang [About silence – in educational settings]. Lund, Swedon: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  6. Alerby, E., & Bergmark, U. (2012). What can an image tell? Challenges and benefits of using visual art as a research method to voice lived experiences of students and teachers. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 1(1), 95–104.Google Scholar
  7. Alerby, E., & Brown, J. (Eds.). (2008). Voices from the margins: School experiences of indigenous, refugee and migrant children. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Alerby, E., & Elídóttir, J. (2003). The sounds of silence: Some remarks on the value of silence in the process of reflection in relation to teaching and learning. Reflective Practice, 1, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Alerby, E., & Istenic Starcic, A. (2008). The significance of children’s experiences of computers in their everyday life. In Vida Medved Udovic, Mara Cotic, & Majda Cencic (Eds.), Sodobne stratgije ucenja in poucevanja. Ljubljana: CIP – Katalozni zapis o publikaciji.Google Scholar
  10. Aronsson, K., & Andersson, S. (1996). Social scaling in children’s drawings of classroom life: A cultural comparative analysis of social scaling in Africa and Sweden, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14, 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bengtsson, J. (2001). Sammanflätningar. Husserls och Merleau-Pontys fenomenologi [The phenomenology of Husserl and Merleau-Ponty]. Göteborg: Bokförlaget Daidalos.Google Scholar
  12. Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, presence, and power: “Student voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dewey, J. (1991). How we think. New York, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  14. Hertting, K., & Alerby, E. (2009). Learning without boundaries: To voice indigenous children’s experiences of learning places. The International Journal of Learning, 16, 633–647.Google Scholar
  15. Hurtig, M. (2007). “Jag vågar visa att jag kan” – om meningsskapande med digitala portföljer [’I dare to show that I can’ – On meaning-making with digital portfolios]. PhD thesis. Luleå: Luleå University of Technology.Google Scholar
  16. Jonsson, G., Sarri, C., & Alerby, E. (2012). Too hot for the reindeer: Voicing Sámi children’s visions of the future. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 21(2), 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes of media of contemporary communication. London, UK: Arnold Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Luttrell, W. (2010). A camera is a big responsibility: A lens for analyzing children’s visual voices. Visual Studies, 25(3), 224–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1995). Signs. Illinois, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Polanyi, M. (1969). Knowing and being. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Roberts, A., & Nash, J. (2009). Enabling students to participate in school improvement through a students as researchers programme. Improving Schools, 12(2), 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Robinson, C., & Taylor, C. (2007). Theorizing student voice: Values and perspectives. Improving Schools, 10(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sewell, K. (2011). Researching sensitive issues: A critical appraisal of ‘draw-and-write’ as a data collection technique in eliciting children’s perceptions. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 34(2), 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, UK: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  25. Westman, S. (2014). Ambiguities and intertwinings in teachers’ work: Existential dimensions in the midst of experience and global trends (PhD thesis). Luleå, Sweden: Luleå University of Technology.Google Scholar
  26. Westman, S., Alerby, E., & Brown, J. (2013). The phenomenology of teachers work: Images of control, chaos an care. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(4), 222–233.Google Scholar
  27. Yates, L. (2010). The story they want to tell, and the visual story as evidence: Young people, research authority and research purposes in the education and health domains. Visual Studies, 25(3), 280–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Alerby

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations