Advertisement

Abstract

As Bessant (2008, p. 347) points out with considerable dismay, more recently neurological science has been used to argue that young people as an entire cohort are “a ‘high risk group’ who are irresponsible, troublesome, rebellious, and even criminally inclined, and that this can be explained in terms of the biological development of the human brain”.

Keywords

Young People Distributive Justice Homeless Youth Inclusive Education Moral Panic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, T. (2014). Doorstop interview, Melbourne, 26 August 2014. Available: http://www.pm.gov.au/media/2014-08-26/doorstop-interview-melbourne
  2. Anglicare (2104). Being a/part. State of the family report. Website. Available: http://www.anglicare.asn.au/site/being_a_part__state_of_the_family_report_2014.php
  3. Batten, M. and Russell, J. (1995). Students at risk. A review of Australian literature 1980-1994. Melbourne: ACER.Google Scholar
  4. Bessant, J. (2008). Hard wired for risk: Neurological science, ‘the adolescent brain’ and developmental theory. Journal of Youth Studies, 11(3), 347-360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blakers, C., & Nicholson, B. (1988). On the fringe. Second chance education for disadvantaged young people. Canberra: The Youth Bureau (DEET).Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1990). In other words. Essays towards a reflexive sociology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In International encyclopaedia of education (Vol 3, 2nd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  8. Coffey, J., & Farrugia, D. (2013). Unpacking the black box: The problem of agency in the sociology of youth, Journal of Youth Studies, 17(4), 461-474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, S. (1972). Folk devils and moral panics, the creation of the mods and rockers. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
  10. Connell, R. (1994). Poverty and education. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 125-149,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Connell, R., White, V., & Johnston, K. (1992). An experiment in justice: The Disadvantaged Schools Program and the question of poverty, 1974-1990. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 13(4), 447-464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DECD [South Australia]. (2013). Innovative community action networks. Government of South Australia, Department of Education and Child Development. Available: http://www.ican.sa.edu.au/pages/aboutus/
  13. DEEWR. (2011). Youth connections: Program guidelines September 2011. Government of Australia, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
  14. DHEW [Department of Health, Education and Welfare]. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington: Author. Available: www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html
  15. Diamond, L. (2006). Triage for struggling adolescent readers. School Administrator, 63(4), 10-14.Google Scholar
  16. Dwyer, P., & Wyn, J. (2001). Youth, education and risk. Facing the future. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  17. Eckersley, R. (2011). A new narrative of young people’s health and well- being. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(5), 627-638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farrugia, D. (2013). The possibility of symbolic violence in interviews with young people experiencing homelessness. In K. te Riele & R. Brooks (Eds.), Negotiating ethical challenges in youth research (pp. 109-121). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Fielding, M. (2007). Beyond “voice”: New roles, relations, and contexts in researching with young people. Discourse, 28(3), 301-310.Google Scholar
  20. Fielding, M., & Moss, P. (2011). Radical education and the common school. A democratic alternative. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. France, A. (2007). Understanding youth in late modernity. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Fraser, N. (1996). Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, and participation. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Stanford University, 30 April-2 May 1996.Google Scholar
  23. Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Garner, B. (2014). Lifters and leaners: Why the idea of equality of opportunity is a big con. The Age, 17 June 2014. Available: http://www.theage.com.au/comment/lifters-and-leaners-why-the-idea-ofequality-of-opportunity-is-a-big-con-20140617-zsa6d.html
  25. Gillborn, D., & Youdell, D. (2000). Rationing education: Policy, practice, reform and equality. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gonski, D., Boston, K., Greiner, K., Lawrence, C., Scales, B., & Tannock, P. (2011). Review of funding for schooling. Final report. Canberra: DEEWR. Available: http://www.appa.asn.au/content/gonskireport/Review-of-Funding-for-Schooling-Final-Report-Dec-2011.pdf
  27. Hess, A. (1986). Educational triage in an urban school setting. Metropolitan Education, 2, 39-52.Google Scholar
  28. Johnston, K., & Hayes, D. (2008). ‘This is as good as it gets’: Classroom lessons and learning in challenging circumstances. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31(2), 109-127.Google Scholar
  29. Kellett, M. (2009). Children as researchers: What we can learn from them about the impact of poverty on literacy opportunities? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(4), 395-408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelly, P. (2001) Youth at risk: Processes of individualisation and responsibilisation in the risk society, Discourse, 22(1), 23-33.Google Scholar
  31. Mills, M., McGregor, G., Hayes, D., & Te Riele, K. (2015). ‘Schools are for us’. The importance of distribution, recognition and representation to creating socially just schools. In S. Riddle, A. Black, & K. Trimmer (Eds.), Researching mainstreams, margins and the spaces in-between (pp. 152-169). London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Murray, D. (2012). Foreword. In Youth Affairs Council of Victoria, Connect For: Improved outcomes for Victoria’s vulnerable young people. Conference program. Melbourne, 25-26 June.Google Scholar
  33. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Roman, L. (1996). Spectacle in the dark: Youth as transgression, display, and repression. Educational Theory, 46(1), 1-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scales, P. (2013). Teaching in the lifelong learning sector (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school. Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Smyth, J., & Hattam, R. (2001). ‘Voiced’ research as a sociology for understanding ‘dropping out’ of school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(3), 401-415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smyth, J., & Wrigley, T. (2013). Living on the edge. Rethinking poverty, class and schooling. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Strategic Partners. (2001). Innovation and best practice in schools: Review of literature and practice. Canberra: DETYA.Google Scholar
  40. Te Riele, K. (2012). Negotiating risk and hope: A case study of alternative education for marginalized youth in Australia. In W. Pink (Ed.), Schools and marginalized youth: An international perspective (pp. 31-79). Cresskill (NJ): Hampton PressGoogle Scholar
  41. Te Riele, K. (2014). Putting the jigsaw together: Flexible learning programs in Australia. Final report. Melbourne: The Victoria Institute for Education, Diversity and Lifelong Learning. Available: http://dusseldorp.org.au/priorities/alternative-learning/jigsaw/
  42. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Victorian Government. (2010). Positive pathways for Victoria’s vulnerable young people: A policy framework to support vulnerable youth. Melbourne: Victorian Government.Google Scholar
  44. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: why equality is better for everyone. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
  45. Wyn, J., & White, R. (1998). Young people, social problems and Australian youth studies. Journal of Youth Studies, 1(1), 23-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kitty Te Riele
    • 1
  1. 1.Victoria Institute for Education, Diversity and Lifelong LearningVictoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations