Re-Presenting or Representing Young Lives?
In the context of research governance, young people are generally perceived to become less vulnerable with age, with older young people (16-18) in some cases being able to consent to research without their parent or guardian’s permission. There are, of course, other indicators of ‘vulnerability’ used in research that intersect with the category of ‘youth’.
KeywordsYoung People Research Practice Digital Storytelling Young Life Vulnerable Youth
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2011). The ethics of research with children and young people: A practical handbook (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Anderson-Newton, L., Callingham, M., Dihm, C., Downie, K., Farthing, B., & Symons, T. (2014). Action research on engagement. Connect, 206, 14-19.Google Scholar
- Baker, A. M. (2013). More than free paint. Exploring young people’s experiences of the B-Creative street art program. Final Report. Melbourne: The Victoria Institute for Diversity and Lifelong Learning.Google Scholar
- Bell, L. A. (2010). Storytelling for social justice: Connecting narrative and the arts in antiracist teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Blum-Ross, A. (2013). Authentic representations? Ethical quandaries in participatory filmmaking with young people. In K. Te Riele & R. Brooks (Eds.), Negotiating ethical challenges in youth research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Cahill, C., Rios-Moore, I., & Threatts, T. (2008). Different eyes/open eyes. Community-based participatory action research. In J. Cammarota & M. Fine (Eds.), Revolutionizing education. Youth participatory action research in motion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Cammarota, J., & Fine, M. (Eds.). (2010). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Fine, M. (2014). Circuits of dispossession and privilege. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology. New York: Springer Reference.Google Scholar
- Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., & Wong, L. (2000). For whom. Qualitative research, representations, and Social Responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hart, R. (1992). Children’s participation. From tokenism to citizenship. Florence: UNICEFGoogle Scholar
- Kessi, S. (2011). PhotoVoice as a practice of re-presentation and social solidarity: Experiences from a youth empowerment project in Dar es Salaam and Soweto. Papers on Social Representations, 20, 7.1-7.27.Google Scholar
- Moore, P. (1997). Introduction: Knowing bodies. In P. Moore (Ed.), Building bodies. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Te Riele, K. (2014). Putting the jigsaw together: Flexible learning programs in Australia. Final Report. Melbourne: The Victoria Institute for Diversity and Lifelong Learning.Google Scholar
- Tisdall, K. (2005). Participation or protection? Children, young people and dissemination. In N. Hallowell, J. Lawton, & S. Gregory (Eds.), Reflections on research. The realities of doing research in the social sciences. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Tisdall, E. K. M. (2009). Dissemination – Or engagement? In E. K. M. Tisdall, J. M. Davis, & M. Gallagher (Eds.), Researching with children and young people. Research design, methods and analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Weis, L., & Fine, M. (2000). Construction sites: An introduction. In L. Weis & M. Fine (Eds.), Construction sites: Excavating race, class, and gender among urban youth. The Teaching for Social Justice Series. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar