Advertisement

Re-Presenting or Representing Young Lives?

Negotiating Knowledge Construction of and with ‘Vulnerable’ Young people
  • Alison Baker
  • Vicky Plows
Chapter
Part of the Innovations and Controversies: Interrogating Educational Change book series (ICIE)

Abstract

In the context of research governance, young people are generally perceived to become less vulnerable with age, with older young people (16-18) in some cases being able to consent to research without their parent or guardian’s permission. There are, of course, other indicators of ‘vulnerability’ used in research that intersect with the category of ‘youth’.

Keywords

Young People Research Practice Digital Storytelling Young Life Vulnerable Youth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitken, S. C., & Plows, V. (2010). Overturning assumptions about young people, border spaces and revolutions. Children’s Geographies, 8(5), 327-333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2011). The ethics of research with children and young people: A practical handbook (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson-Newton, L., Callingham, M., Dihm, C., Downie, K., Farthing, B., & Symons, T. (2014). Action research on engagement. Connect, 206, 14-19.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, A. M. (2013). More than free paint. Exploring young people’s experiences of the B-Creative street art program. Final Report. Melbourne: The Victoria Institute for Diversity and Lifelong Learning.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, A. M., & Brookins, C. C. (2014). Towards the development of a Sociopolitical Consciousness Measure: Listening to the voices of Salvadoran youth. Journal of Community Psychology, 42(8), 1015-1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, L. A. (2010). Storytelling for social justice: Connecting narrative and the arts in antiracist teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Bottrell, D. (2007). Resistance, resilience and social identities: Reframing ‘problem youth’ and the problem of schooling. Journal of Youth Studies, 10(5), 597-616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blum-Ross, A. (2013). Authentic representations? Ethical quandaries in participatory filmmaking with young people. In K. Te Riele & R. Brooks (Eds.), Negotiating ethical challenges in youth research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Cahill, C., Rios-Moore, I., & Threatts, T. (2008). Different eyes/open eyes. Community-based participatory action research. In J. Cammarota & M. Fine (Eds.), Revolutionizing education. Youth participatory action research in motion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Carter, B. (2009). Tick box for child? The ethical positioning of children as vulnerable, researchers as barbarians and reviewers as overly cautious. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(6), 858-864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cammarota, J., & Fine, M. (Eds.). (2010). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Fine, M. (2014). Circuits of dispossession and privilege. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology. New York: Springer Reference.Google Scholar
  13. Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., & Wong, L. (2000). For whom. Qualitative research, representations, and Social Responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Hanauer, D. I. (2004). Silence, voice and erasure: Psychological embodiment in graffiti at the site of Prime Minister Rabin’s assassination. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 31(1), 29-35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hart, R. (1992). Children’s participation. From tokenism to citizenship. Florence: UNICEFGoogle Scholar
  16. Holland, S., Renold, E., Ross, N. J., & Hillman, A. (2010). Power, agency and participatory agendas: A critical exploration of young people’s engagement in participative qualitative research. Childhood, 17(3), 360-375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kessi, S. (2011). PhotoVoice as a practice of re-presentation and social solidarity: Experiences from a youth empowerment project in Dar es Salaam and Soweto. Papers on Social Representations, 20, 7.1-7.27.Google Scholar
  18. Moore, P. (1997). Introduction: Knowing bodies. In P. Moore (Ed.), Building bodies. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Nind, M., Boorman, G., & Clarke, G. (2012). Creating spaces to belong: listening to the voices of girls with behavioural, emotional and social difficulties through digital visual and narrative methods, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(7), 643-656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Porter, G., Townsend, J., & Hampshire, K. (2012). Children and young people as producers of knowledge. Children’s Geographies, 10(2), 131-134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rolón-Dow, R. (2011). Race(ing) stories: Digital storytelling as a tool for critical race scholarship. Race Ethnicity and Education, 14(2), 159-173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rappaport, J. (2000). Community narratives: Tales of terror and joy. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(1), 1-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2010). Everyday ethics: Reflections on practice, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(4), 379-391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sime, D. (2008). Ethical and methodological issues in engaging young people living in poverty with participatory research methods. Children’s Geographies, 6(1), 63-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Te Riele, K. (2014). Putting the jigsaw together: Flexible learning programs in Australia. Final Report. Melbourne: The Victoria Institute for Diversity and Lifelong Learning.Google Scholar
  26. Tisdall, K. (2005). Participation or protection? Children, young people and dissemination. In N. Hallowell, J. Lawton, & S. Gregory (Eds.), Reflections on research. The realities of doing research in the social sciences. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Tisdall, E. K. M. (2009). Dissemination – Or engagement? In E. K. M. Tisdall, J. M. Davis, & M. Gallagher (Eds.), Researching with children and young people. Research design, methods and analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Valentine, G. (1999). Being seen and heard? The ethical complexities of working with children and young people at home and at school. Philosophy and Geography, 2(2), 141-155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Valentine, G., Butler, R., & Skelton, T. (2001). The ethical and methodological complexities of doing research with ‘vulnerable’ young people. Ethics, Place & Environment, 4(2), 119-125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Van Blerk, L., & Ansell, N. (2007). Participatory feedback and dissemination with and for children: reflections from research with young migrants in southern Africa. Children’s Geographies, 5(3), 313-324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Watkins, M., & Shulman, H. (2008). Toward psychologies of liberation. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weis, L., & Fine, M. (2000). Construction sites: An introduction. In L. Weis & M. Fine (Eds.), Construction sites: Excavating race, class, and gender among urban youth. The Teaching for Social Justice Series. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  33. Wilson, N., Dasho, S., Martin, A. C., Wallerstein, N., Wang, C. C., & Minkler, M. (2007). Engaging young adolescents in social action through photovoice The Youth Empowerment Strategies (YES!) Project. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 27(2), 241-261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alison Baker
    • 1
  • Vicky Plows
    • 2
  1. 1.Victoria Institute for Education, Diversity and Lifelong LearningVictoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Victoria Institute for Education, Diversity and Lifelong LearningVictoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations