Sideline – Autoethnographic Analysis

  • Michael Crowhurst


Autoethnography is a form of reflective practice that is particularly useful where the situation under consideration is confusing or provokes tension. This approach is about attempting to unpack and analyze tension (Crowhurst, 1999). Autoethnographic methods rest on a number of assumptions and I will very briefly outline some of the key ones here.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Buchbinder, D. ( 1994 ). Masculinities and identities. Melbourne, Victoria : Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Crowhurst, M. ( 1999 ). Are you gay/sir? Melbourne Studies in Education, 40 ( 2 ), 89 – 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (DEECD). ( 2014 ). Principles of learning and teaching (PoLT). Retrieved from
  4. Freire, P. ( 1999 ). Pedagogy of the oppressed: New revised 20th-anniversary edition. New York, NY : Continuum.Google Scholar
  5. Mansfield, N. ( 2000 ). Subjectivity: Theories of the self from Freud to Haraway. New York, NY : New York University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Preissle, J., & Grant, L. ( 2004 ). Fieldwork traditions. In K. DeMarrais & S. Lapan (Eds.), Foundations for research: Methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences ( p. 177 ). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Youdell, D. ( 2011 ). School trouble: Identity, power and politics in education. New York, NY : Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Crowhurst

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations