Advertisement

The Voice of the Voiceless

Limitations of Empowerment and the Potential of Insider-Activist Methodologies with Anarcho-Punk Youth
  • Sarah Grace Fessenden
Part of the New Research – New Voices book series (NRNV)

Abstract

Engaged models and, specifically, collaborative and participatory action research have been heralded as the quintessential ethical approaches to applied ethnographic research endeavors. Models such as action research enacted by Sol Tax (1975) are instrumental in the inclusion of native voices and can provide for sustainable outcomes of, for example, development projects (Gwynne, 2003).

Keywords

Social Movement Participatory Action Research Homeless Youth Current Anthropology Organ Trafficking 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Anthropological Association. (2009). Code of ethics of the American Anthropological Association. http://www.aaanet.org/profdev/ethics/
  2. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Day, R. J. F. (2004). From hegemony to affinity: The political logic of the newest social movements. Cultural Studies, 18(5), 716-748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de la Rocha, Z. (1999). The voice of the voiceless. Recorded by rage against the machine. On Battle of Los Angeles. Australia: Sony Music Entertainment.Google Scholar
  5. Debord, G. (2002 [1967]). The society of the spectacle. Canberra, UK: Hobgoblin Press.Google Scholar
  6. Deloria, V. (2007[1973]). Custer died for your sins. In A. Robben & J. Sluka (Eds.), Ethnographic fieldwork (pp. 183-190). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Dudley, E. (1993). The critical villager: Beyond community participation. New York, NY: Routlege.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Epstein, B. (1991). Political protest and cultural revolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fernandez, L. A. (2008). Policing dissent. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fessenden, S. G. (2011). Recycled identities: Anarcho-punx, organization, style, and reciprocity in Barcelona, Spain. Thesis. California State University, Long Beach.Google Scholar
  11. Finkelstein, M. (2005). With no direction home: Homeless youth on the road and in the streets. Canada: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  12. Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25(26), 56-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glass, P. G. (2012). Doing scene: Identity, space, and the interactional accomplishment of youth culture. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 41(6), 695-716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goode, J. (2010). How urban ethnography counters myths about the poor. In G. Gmelch, R. V. Kemper, & W. P. Zenner (Eds.), Urban life: Readings in the anthropology of the city (pp. 185-201). Long Grove: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  15. Graeber, D. (2004). Fragments of an anarchist anthropology. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  16. Graeber, D. (2009). Direct Action: An Ethnography. Edinburgh, Scotland: AK Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gwynne, M. A. (2003). Applied anthropology: A career-oriented approach. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  18. Hebdige, D. (1979). Subculture: The meaning of style. London, UK: Methuen and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. Johnston, B. R., & Barker, H. (2008). The Rongelap report: Consequential damages of nuclear war. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  20. Johnston, B. R. (2010). Social responsibility and the anthropological citizen. Theme Issue, Current Anthropology, 51(2), 235-247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Juris, J. S. (2007). Practicing militant ethnography with the Movement for Global Resistance (MRG) in Barcelona. In S. Shukaitis & D. Graeber (Eds.), Constituent imagination: Militant investigation, collective theorization (pp. 164-176). Oakland, CA: AK Press.Google Scholar
  22. Juris, J. S. (2008). Performing politics: Image, embodiment, and affective solidarity during anticorporate globalization protests. Ethnography, 9(1), 61-97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Katsiaficas, G. (2006[1997]). The subversion of politics: European autonomous social movements and the decolonization of everyday life. Oakland, CA: AK Press.Google Scholar
  24. Katz, M. (1993). The “underclass” debate: Views from history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lassiter, L. E. (2005). Collaborative ethnography and public anthropology. Current Anthropology, 46(1), 83-106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Langman, L. (2008). Punk, porn and resistance: Carnivalization and the body in popular culture. Current Sociology, 56(4), 657-677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewis, O. (1959). Five families: Mexican case studies in the culture of poverty. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Lewis, O. (1963). The culture of poverty. Society, 1(1), 17-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Low, S. M., & Merry, S. E. (2010). Engaged anthropology: Diversity and dilemmas. Theme Issue, Current Anthropology, 51(2), 203-226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McDonald, R., & Shildrick, T. (2007). Street corner society: Leisure careers, youth (sub)culture and social exclusion. Leisure Studies, 26(3), 339-355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mahmood, S. (2005). Agency, gender, and embodiment. In Mahmood, S. (Ed.), Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject (pp. 153-188). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Marcus, A. A. (2006). Where have all the homeless gone?: The making and unmaking of a crisis. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  33. McHenry, K. (2012). Hungry for peace: How you can help end poverty and war with Food Not Bombs. Tuscon, AZ: See Sharp PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Miller, D. (1997). Capitalism: An ethnographic approach. Washington, DC: Berg.Google Scholar
  35. Moynihan, D. P. (1965). Negro family: The case for national action. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Planning and Research, U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
  36. Nash, J. (1992). Interpreting social movements: Bolivian resistance to economic conditions imposed by the International Monetary Fund. American Ethnologist, 19(2), 275-293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nash, J. (2007). Practicing ethnography in a globalizing world: An anthropological Odyssey. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rethmann, P. (2006). On militancy, sort of. Cultural Critique, 62, 67-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Robben, A. C. G. M., & Sluka, J. A. (Eds.). (2007). Ethnographic fieldwork: An anthropological reader (Vol. 9). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Roseberry, W. (1988). Political economy. Annual Review of Anthropology, 17(1), 161-185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sachs, J. D. (2005). The end of poverty: Economic possibilities for our time. New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  42. Scheper-Hughes, N. (1995). The primacy of the ethical: Propositions for a militant ethnography. Current Anthropology, 36(3), 409-440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scheper-Hughes, N. (2004). Parts unknown: Undercover ethnography of the organs-trafficking underworld. Ethnography, 5(1), 29-73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Spivak, G. C. (1994[1988]). Can the subaltern speak? In P. William & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: A reader (pp. 66-111). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Tax, S. (1975). Action anthropology. Current Anthropology, 16(4), 514-517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vaneigem, R. (2012[1967]). The revolution of everyday life. London, England: Rebel Press.Google Scholar
  48. Von Braun, J., & Gatzweiler, F. W. (2014). Marginality – An overview and implications for policy. In J. von Braun & F. W. Gatzweiler (Eds.), Marginality: Addressing the nexus of poverty, exclusion and ecology (pp. 1-23). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wacquant, L. (2008). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  50. Weis, L., & Fine, M. (1996). Narrating the 1980s and 1990s: Voices of poor and working-class white and African American men. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 27(4), 493-516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Grace Fessenden
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of British ColumbiaCanada

Personalised recommendations