Fieldwork Dilemmas

Conducting Qualitative Research with Orphanage Youth in Ukraine
  • Alla Korzh
Part of the New Research – New Voices book series (NRNV)


Ukrainian orphans or children deprived of parental care are pushed to the margins of society and are under-represented in international research on vulnerable children. Institutionalized in orphanages, Ukrainian orphans lack equal educational and economic opportunities to fully participate in society.


Focus Group Interview Vocational School Vulnerable Child Observation Note Rapport Building 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abebe, T. (2009). Orphanhood, poverty and the care dilemma: Review of global policy trends. Social Work and Society, 7(1), 70-85.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, D. (2000). Fieldwork and the “doctoring” of national identities in Arctic Siberia. In H. G. De Soto & N. Dudwick, (Eds.), Fieldwork dilemmas: Anthropologists in postsocialist states (pp. 130-148). Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  3. Angrosino, M., & Rosenberg, J. (2013). Observations on observation: Continuities and challenges. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln, (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (4th ed., pp.467–478). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Artiuh, O. R., Babak, O. V., Balakirieva, O. M., Dudar, N. P., Zhabynets, I. M., Koniuhov, T. O., Pesha, I.V., …, Yaremenko, O. O. (2001). To find oneself: Life stories of orphanage alumni. Kyiv: Ukrainian Institute of Social Research.Google Scholar
  5. Artiuh, O. R., Balym, L. V., Bondarenko, T. V., Bryzhata, T. P., Vakulenko, O. V., Volynets, L. S., Hrybova, S. M., …, Tsymbaliuk, M. M. (2006). Sotsialniy zakhyst ditei-syrit ta ditei, pozbavlenykh batkivskoho pikluvannia: dosvid reformuvannia [Social protection of orphans and children deprived of parental care: The reform experience]. Kyiv, Ukraine: State Institute of Family and Youth Development.Google Scholar
  6. Bajaj, M. (2010). Intergenerational perspectives on education and employment in the Zambian copperbelt. Comparative Education Review, 54(2), 175-197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balakireva, O. M., Bondar, T. V., Varban, M. Y., Haniukov, O. A., Dudar, N. P., Kiershys, O. A., Kupchynska, M. L., & Yaremenko, O. O. (2000). Vyhovantsi internativ pro sebe i svoie zhyttia [Internat children: About themselves and their life stories]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Ukrainian Institute of Social Research.Google Scholar
  8. Balakireva, O. M., Bykovska, O. V., & Baranchuk, D. H. (2004). Problemy bezdohliadnosti ta bezprytulnosti ditey [Problems of neglected and homeless children]. Kyiv, Ukraine: State Institute of Family and Youth Problems.Google Scholar
  9. Balakireva, O. M., Chernin, I. M., Hmelevska, O. M., Nychyporenko, S. V., Kalashnikova, T. M., Bondar, T. V., & Klymenko, Y. M. (2010). Analitychnyi zvit: Zhyttievyi shliah vypusknykiv internatnykh zakladiv, dytiachykh budynkiv simeynoho typu ta pryiomnykh simei [Analytical report: The life journey of orphanage alumni and children growing up in family-type and foster homes]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Oleksandr Yaremenko Ukrainian Institute of Social Research.Google Scholar
  10. Berg, B. (2009). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  11. Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. De Soto, H. D. (2000). Crossing Western boundaries: How East Berlin women observed women researchers from the West after socialism, 1991-1992. In H. G. De Soto & N. Dudwick, (Eds.), Fieldwork dilemmas: Anthropologists in postsocialist states (pp. 73-99). Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  13. EveryChild. (2005). Family matters: A study of institutional childcare in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. London, UK: EveryChild.Google Scholar
  14. Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (1998). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. (pp. 47-78.) London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Fujimura, C. K. (2005). Russia’s abandoned children: An intimate understanding. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Hellwig, W., & Lipenkowa, J. (2007). Ukraine. In W. Hörner, H. Döbert, B. Von Kopp, & W. Mitter (Eds.), The education systems of Europe (pp. 808-825). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hill, M. (2006). Children's voices on ways of having a voice: Children’s and young people’s perspectives on methods used in research and consultation. Childhood, 13(1), 69-89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hunt, K. (1998). Abandoned to the state: Cruelty and neglect in Russian orphanages. New York, NY: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Kendall, N., & O’Gara, C. (2007). Vulnerable children, communities and schools: Lessons from three HIV/AIDS affected areas. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 37(1), 5-21.Google Scholar
  21. Kogan I., Gebel, M., & Noelke, C. (2011). Making the transition. Education and labor market entry in Central and Eastern Europe. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kołodko, G. (2000). From shock to therapy: The political economy of postsocialist transformation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Korzh, A. (2013). What are we educating our youth for? The role of education in the era of vocational schools for “dummies” and diploma mill universities in Ukraine. European Education: Issues and Studies, 45(1), 50-73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Korzh, A. (2014). ‘Adapting’ education to student needs: Unchallenging education in Ukrainian orphanages. In D. B. Napier, A. Clementina, & A. Pitman (Eds.), Qualities of education in a globalized world (pp. 167-184). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Lough, B. N., & Panos, P. (2003). Rise and demise of orphanages in Ukraine. European Journal of Social Work, 6(1), 49-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Maxwell, J. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Conducting effective interviews In S. B. Merriam, Case study research in education: A qualitative approach (pp. 71-90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Perelli-Harris, B. (2008). Family formation in post-Soviet Ukraine: Changing effects of education in a period of rapid social change. Social Forces, 87(2), 767-794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peshkin, A. (1988). In search of subjectivity – One’s own. Educational Researcher, 17(7), 17-22.Google Scholar
  32. Ransel, L. D. (1988). Mothers of misery: Child abandonment in Russia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Smiley, A. (2011). Redefining vulnerability: Orphanhood, educational participation, and agency among secondary school students in Lesotho. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Columbia University Teachers College.Google Scholar
  34. State Statistics Agency of Ukraine. (2012). Vulnerable child protection. Kyiv, Ukraine.Google Scholar
  35. Stiglitz, J. (2003). Globalization and its discontents. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  36. Tisdall K., Davis J. M., & Gallagher M. (2009). Researching with children and young people: Research design, methods and analysis. London, UK: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ukrainian Institute of Social Research. (2001). Institutionalization reasons and future of the youth upon leaving state-run institutionalized care. Kyiv, Ukraine: Ukrainian Institute of Social Research.Google Scholar
  38. Ukrainian State Statistic Committee. (2010). Retrieved from
  39. UNDP. (2003). The power of decentralization: Ukraine human development report. Retrieved from Google Scholar
  40. UNICEF. (2012). UNICEF Ukraine. Retrieved from Google Scholar
  41. Volynets L. S., Komarova, N. M., Antonovo-Turchenko, O. H., Ivanova, I. B., & Pesha, I. V. (1998). Sotsialne syritstvo v Ukraiini: Ekspertna otsinka ta analiz isnuiuchoii v Ukraiini systemy utrymannia ta vykhovannia ditei, pozbavlenyh batkivskoho pikluvannia [Social orphans in Ukraine: Evaluation and analysis of the existing system of maintenance and upbringing of children deprived of parental care]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Ukrainian Institute of Social Research.Google Scholar
  42. Walker, C. (2010). Learning to labor in post-Soviet Russia: Vocational youth in transition. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Yakovenko, V. S. (1997). An orphan-child: Development, upbringing, adoption. Kirovograd, Ukraine: Kirovograd State Pedagogical Institute.Google Scholar
  44. Zanca, R. (2000). Intruder in Uzbekistan: Walking the line between community needs and anthropological desiderata. In H. G. De Soto & N. Dudwick, (Eds.), Fieldwork dilemmas: Anthropologists in postsocialist states (pp.153-171). Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  45. Zezina, M. R. (2001). The system of social protection for orphaned children in the USSR. Russian Education and Society, 42(3), 44-63.Google Scholar
  46. Zivkovic, M. (2000). Telling stories of Serbia: Native and other dilemmas on the edge of chaos. In H. G. De Soto & N. Dudwick, (Eds.), Fieldwork dilemmas: Anthropologists in postsocialist states (pp.49-67). Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alla Korzh
    • 1
  1. 1.Columbia UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations