Skip to main content

Military Ecocide

Abstract

Military ecocide, the destruction of the natural environment in the course of fighting or preparing for war, has a long history and remains a prominent feature of contemporary conflicts. Efforts to prohibit this in International Law were initiated after the US’ notorious defoliation campaign in the Vietnam War in the 1960s and have developed since then. Whilst legal ambiguities and the defence of military necessity have limited the application of this body of law the proscription of ecocide has, nevertheless, progressed and looks set to develop further. Normative change driven by scientists, environmentalists and legal experts has raised awareness of and stigmatized such practises to the extent that recourse to the worst excesses of ecocide now appears to have lessened and some recompense for past crimes has been made. Military activities, though, continue to inflict a heavy cost on the environment and the drive for a more explicit legal prohibition of this has grown.

Keywords

  • ecocide
  • Scorched Earth
  • Agent Orange
  • environment

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Carson 1962.

  2. 2.

    2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid.

  3. 3.

    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid.

  4. 4.

    Connor and Thomas 1984.

  5. 5.

    NAS 1974, 5–6.

  6. 6.

    Ibid., vii–9.

  7. 7.

    Franklin 2003.

  8. 8.

    Westing 1984, 166.

  9. 9.

    Westing 1989, 337.

  10. 10.

    Westing 1974, 26.

  11. 11.

    Cook et al. 1970.

  12. 12.

    Hay 1982, 151.

  13. 13.

    Ibid., 165.

  14. 14.

    Peluso and Vandergeest 2011.

  15. 15.

    Weinstein 2005, 715.

  16. 16.

    CoE 2011.

  17. 17.

    Sanders 2009, 71–2.

  18. 18.

    UNEP 2002.

  19. 19.

    CoE 2011; Sheehan 2003.

  20. 20.

    Kalpers 2001.

  21. 21.

    Glasby and Voytekhovsky 2010, 20.

  22. 22.

    Auer 2004, 119–121.

  23. 23.

    Schettler 1995.

  24. 24.

    Peluso and Vandegeest 2011.

  25. 25.

    Sanders 2009, 50, 61, 68.

  26. 26.

    Boas and Schabas 2003, 293.

  27. 27.

    Brady and Re 2018, 116.

  28. 28.

    Roberts and Guelff 2000, 407–418.

  29. 29.

    S/RES/687 (1991) 8 April.

  30. 30.

    Payne 2016, 725–6.

  31. 31.

    A/RES/47/37.

  32. 32.

    A/RES/49/50.

  33. 33.

    Peterson 2009; Jha 2014, 213–4.

  34. 34.

    Plakokefalos 2017, 263.

  35. 35.

    Higgins 2010.

  36. 36.

    ILC 2016.

  37. 37.

    UNEP 2007.

  38. 38.

    CoE 2011.

  39. 39.

    BBC 2004.

  40. 40.

    USDC 2005, 233.

  41. 41.

    Frieman 2004.

  42. 42.

    TOTALSA v France 2008; Belize v Westerhaven 2009.

  43. 43.

    Bolivia 2011.

  44. 44.

    Ecuador 2008.

References

  • Auer M (2004) Restoring Cursed Earth: Appraising Environmental Policy Reforms in East Europe and Russia. Rowman & Littlefield, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas G, Schabas W (2003) International Criminal Law. Developments in the Case Law of the ICTY. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolivia (2011) Law of Mother Earth. Law 071

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady H, Re D (2018) Environmental and Cultural Heritage Crimes: the Possibilities Under the Rome Statute. In: Bose M, Bohlander M, Klip A, Lagodny O (eds) Justice Without Borders: Essays in Honour of Wolfgang Schomburg. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden: 103–136

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC (2004) WW2 Bombs Unearthed in China 19 June http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/3822007.stm (accessed 31 January 2016)

  • Carson R (1962) Silent Spring. Penguin, Harmondsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor S, Thomas A (1984) How Britain Sprayed Malaya With Dioxin. In: Sahabat Alam Malaysia (eds) Pesticide Dilemma in the Third World. A Case Study of Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook RE, Haseltine W, Galston AW (1970) ‘What have we done to Vietnam?’ In: Weisberg B (ed) Ecocide in Indochina: the ecology of war. Canfield Press, San Francisco, 89–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (CoE) (2011) Armed Conflicts and the Environment. Report of the Committee on the Environment, Agriculture and Local and Regional Affairs, Doc 12744 17 October; Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecuador (2008) Rights for Nature. Constitution, adopted 28 September

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin H (2003) Agent Orange and Cancer. An Overview for Clinicians. Environmental Carcinogens 53(4): 245–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieman W (2004) China, Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. Routledge, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasby G, Voytekhovsky (2010) Arctic Russia: Minerals and Resources. Geoscientist 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay A (1982) The Chemical Scythe- Lessons of 2,4,5,T and Dioxin. Plenum Press, New York

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins P (2010) Eradicating Ecocide: Laws and Governance to Prevent the Destruction of our Planet. Shepheard-Walwyn, London

    Google Scholar 

  • ILC (2016) Third report on the protection of the environment in relation to armed conflicts Submitted by Marie G. Jacobsson, Special Rapporteur, United Nations General Assembly 3 June

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha U (2014) Armed Conflict and Environmental Damage. Vij books, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalpers J (2001) Armed Conflict and Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa: Impacts, Mechanisms and Responses. In: Armed Conflict and Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa. Biodiversity Support Program, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences (1974) The Effects of Herbicide in South Vietnam, Part A Summary and Conclusion. NAS, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne C (2016) Legal Liability for Environmental Damage. The United Nations Compensation Committee and the 1990-1991 Gulf War. In: Bruch C, Muffett C, Nichols S (eds) Governance, Natural Resources and Post-Conflict Peacebuilding. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Peluso N, Vandergeest P (2011) Taking the Jungle Out of the Forest. In: Peat R, Robbins P, Watts M (eds) Global Political Ecology. Routledge, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson I (2009) The Natural Environment in Times of Armed Conflict: A Concern for International War Crimes Law? Leiden Journal of International Law 22(2): 325–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plakokefalos I (2017) Responsibility for Environmental Damage in Jus Post Bellum. The Problems of Shared Responsibility. In: Stahn C, Iversen J, Easterday J (eds) Environmental Protection and Transition from Conflict to Peace. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts A, Guelff R (2000) Documents on the Laws of War, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders B (2009) The Green Zone: the Environmental Costs of Militarism. AK Press, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Schettler T (1995) Reverberations of Militarism: Toxic Contamination, the Environment, and Health. Medicine and Global Survival, 2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan N (2003) The Aftermath of an Invasion: A field report from Nasiriyah. Warchild, 1 May

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2002) GEO-3: Global Environment Outlook 3. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2007) Lebanon: Post Conflict Environmental Assessment. UNEP, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • USDC (2005) “Agent Orange” Product Liability Litigation. Memorandum Order and Judgement, MDL no. 381 10 March. United States District Court, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein T (2005) Prosecuting Acts that Destroy the Environment: Environmental Crimes or Humanitarian Atrocities? Georgetown International Law Review 17: 607–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing A (1974) Proscription of Ecocide. Science and Public Affairs 26: 24–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing A (1984) Herbicides in War-the Long Term Ecological and Human Consequences. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing A (1989) Herbicides in Warfare: the Case of Indochina. In: Bourdeau P, Haines JA, Klein W, Krishna Murti CR (eds) Ecotoxicology and Climate. John Wiley, Chichester: 337–357

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Hough .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hough, P. (2022). Military Ecocide. In: Sayapin, S., Atadjanov, R., Kadam, U., Kemp, G., Zambrana-Tévar, N., Quénivet, N. (eds) International Conflict and Security Law. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-515-7_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-515-7_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-6265-514-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6265-515-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)