Skip to main content
  • 441 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter will present the issue of urgency as one of the conditions that must exist for the Court to order provisional measures. If there is no urgency, there is no indication of interim measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ICJ Reports 1957, p. 112.

  2. 2.

    ICJ Reports 1973, p. 329.

  3. 3.

    Ibid., p. 330.

  4. 4.

    ICJ Reports 1972, p. 16.

  5. 5.

    ICJ Reports 1973, p. 104. See separate opinion of Judge Gros, ibid., pp. 120 and 155.

  6. 6.

    Application for an order for interim measures of protection brought by Australia, Documents, vol. I, p. 57.

  7. 7.

    ICJ Reports 1976, pp. 11–14.

  8. 8.

    ICJ Reports 1979, p. 21.

  9. 9.

    E.g. Nuclear Tests case, 1973, op. cit., p. 99–106 and in Fisheries Jurisdiction, 1972, op.cit, pp. 12–18.

  10. 10.

    E.g. Interhandel, 1957, op. cit., p. 105–112 and Aegean Sea Continental Shelf, 1979, op. cit., pp. 3–14.

  11. 11.

    Counter-Memorial of the US, 27 March 2000, para 57, www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/104/8554.pdf.

  12. 12.

    Zyberi 2010, pp. 571–584.

  13. 13.

    Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v. Russian Federation), Provisional Measures, Order of 15 October 2008, ICJ Reports 2008, p. 392, para 129. See, for example, Passage through the Great Belt (Finland v. Denmark), Provisional Measures, Order of 29 July 1991, ICJ Reports 1991, p. 17, para 23; Certain Criminal Proceedings in France (Republic of the Congo v. France), Provisional Measure, Order of 17 June 2003, ICJ Reports 2003, p. 107, para 22; Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay), Provisional Measures, Order of 23 January 2007, ICJ Reports 2007 (I).

Reference

  • Zyberi G (2010) Provisional Measures of the International Court of Justice in Armed Conflict Situations, Leiden Journal of International Law 23: 571–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ewa SaƂkiewicz-Munnerlyn .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 T.M.C. Asser Press and the author

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

SaƂkiewicz-Munnerlyn, E. (2022). Urgency. In: Jurisprudence of the PCIJ and of the ICJ on Interim Measures of Protection. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-475-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-475-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-6265-474-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6265-475-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics