Skip to main content

Abstract

In this chapter, we will present various hypotheses regarding interim measures, such as the Court’s prima facie competence, the urgency of the case, irreparable harm, and whether they are binding or not. The final conclusions are based on the Court’s jurisprudence and the views of the doctrine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cot 1969, pp. 1–50.

  2. 2.

    Kelsen 1951, p. 293.

  3. 3.

    Aegean Sea Continental Shelf case, ICJ Reports 1976, p. 3; case concerning US Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran, ICJ Reports 1979, p. 7; case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, ICJ Reports 1984, p. 169.

  4. 4.

    Opinions of Judges Winiarski and Badawi, in Anglo-Iranian Oil Company case, ICJ Reports 1951, p. 97; opinion of Judge Forster in Nuclear Tests, ICJ Reports 1973, p. 111; and of Judge Morozov in Aegean Sea Continental Shelf, ICJ Reports 1976, p. 22.

  5. 5.

    Stańczyk 1986, pp. 193–216.

  6. 6.

    Tunçel 1960, p. 136; Combacau 1974, pp. 93–106.

  7. 7.

    Guyomar 1960, p. 190; see the separate opinion of Judge Gros in the Nuclear Tests case, ICJ Reports 1973, pp. 120 and 155; Eisemann 1973, pp. 351–375.

  8. 8.

    See for example Aegean Continental Shelf case, ICJ Reports 1976, p. 6, and US Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran, ICJ Reports 1979, p. 13.

References

  • Combacau J (1974) Le pouvoir de sanction de l’ONU. Etude théorique de la coercition non militaire. Dalloz, Paris, pp 93–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Cot JP (1969) La bonne foi en droit international public. Cours IHEI, Paris, pp 1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisemann PM (1973) Les effets de la non-comparution devant la CIJ. Annuaire Français de Droit International 19: 351–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyomar G (1960) Le défaut des parties à un différend devant les jurisdiction internationales: études de droit international positif. Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, Paris, p 242

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen H (1951) Law of the United Nations. The London Institute of World Affairs, London, p 293

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrills JG (1995) Interim Measures of Protection in the Recent Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 90–146. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stańczyk J (1986) The International Court of Justice on the competence and function of the Security Council (related to the case brought before it). Instytut Nauk Prawnych Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Warsaw. Polish Yearbook of International Law XV: 193–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunçel E (1960) L’exécution des décisions de la Cour internationale de Justice selon la Charte des Nations Unies. Messeiller, Neuchâtel, p 136

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ewa Sałkiewicz-Munnerlyn .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 T.M.C. Asser Press and the author

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sałkiewicz-Munnerlyn, E. (2022). Final Conclusions. In: Jurisprudence of the PCIJ and of the ICJ on Interim Measures of Protection. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-475-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-475-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-6265-474-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6265-475-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics