Skip to main content

Urbanization, Megacities, Constitutional Silence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 2020

Part of the book series: European Yearbook of Constitutional Law ((EYCL,volume 2))

  • 441 Accesses

Abstract

Urban agglomeration is one of the most significant demographic and geopolitical phenomena of our time. The figures are striking. In 1900, approximately 150 million people, fewer than 10% of the world population, lived in cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hirschl 2020.

  2. 2.

    See, e.g., Hoornweg and Pope 2017, Samet 2013.

  3. 3.

    Lefebvre 1996, Sassen 2001, Krugman and Masahisa 2000, Florida 2002, Barber 2013.

  4. 4.

    Blank 2006, Nijman 2019.

  5. 5.

    See, e.g., Aust 2019.

  6. 6.

    See, e.g., Oomen et al. 2016.

  7. 7.

    Rosenfeld and Sajó 2012.

  8. 8.

    E.g. Tushnet et al. 2013, Jackson and Tushnet 2014, Masterman and Schütze 2019.

  9. 9.

    See, e.g., Ginsburg and Huq 2018, Gardbaum 2020.

  10. 10.

    Schragger 2016.

  11. 11.

    Frug and Barron 2008.

  12. 12.

    Hartog 1983.

  13. 13.

    Schragger 2018a, pp. 67–68.

  14. 14.

    Pritchett 2017, p. 1455.

  15. 15.

    Ibid.

  16. 16.

    Scharff 2016, 2018, Stahl 2017, Schragger 2018b.

  17. 17.

    E.g. Gerken and Revesz 2017, Stahl 2020.

  18. 18.

    See, e.g., Blank and Rosen-Zvi 2018, Fontana 2018.

  19. 19.

    UN DESA 2019.

  20. 20.

    Hirschl 2020, p. 170.

  21. 21.

    Ibid.

  22. 22.

    Bauböck and Orgad 2020, p. 57.

  23. 23.

    E.g. US Supreme Court, Atkin v. Kansas, judgement of 30 November 1903, 191 U.S. 207 (1903); US Supreme Court, Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh, judgement 18 November 1907, 207 U.S. 161 (1907).

  24. 24.

    See, e.g., Briffault 2018, Schragger 2018b.

  25. 25.

    As is well-known, in its decision in the Reference re Secession of Quebec, judgement of 20 August 1998, 2 S.C.R. 217 (1998) case, the Supreme Court of Canada stated that the Canadian Constitution is based on four equally significant underlying principles: (1) federalism, (2) democracy, (3) constitutionalism and the rule of law, and (4) the protection of minorities. None of these principles trumps any of the others.

  26. 26.

    Sansom and Dawkins 2013, Saunders 2005.

  27. 27.

    See, generally, Boggero 2017, Kirchmair 2015, Himsworth 2015.

  28. 28.

    Sassen 2001.

  29. 29.

    Bumke and Voßkuhle 2019, pp. 418–420.

  30. 30.

    Hirschl 2020.

  31. 31.

    Ibid., pp. 119–128.

  32. 32.

    Ibid., pp. 123–124, 127–128.

  33. 33.

    US Supreme Court, Gill v. Whitford, judgement of 18 June 2018, 138 S. Ct. 1916; 585 U.S. (2018).

  34. 34.

    US Supreme Court, Rucho v. Common Cause, judgement of 27 June 2019, No. 18-422, 588 U.S. (2019).

  35. 35.

    Rodden 2019.

  36. 36.

    Barber 2018, p. 11.

  37. 37.

    See, e.g., Le Galès 2002, Spruyt 1996.

  38. 38.

    See, generally, Prak 2018.

  39. 39.

    See Tilly 1992; Taylor 2004. Holding the monopoly over the legitimate use of physical force by a government in a well-defined territory is, according to Max Weber, one of the defining features of the state.

  40. 40.

    Taylor 2004, p. 15.

  41. 41.

    Frug 1980, pp. 1119–1120.

  42. 42.

    Palermo and Kössler 2017, p. 69.

  43. 43.

    See, e.g., Davis 1978, Elazar 1987.

  44. 44.

    Gerken 2010, p. 21.

  45. 45.

    King 2014, p. 295.

  46. 46.

    Levy 2007.

  47. 47.

    Ibid., p. 459.

  48. 48.

    Ibid., pp. 460–463.

  49. 49.

    Weinstock 2014, pp. 269–270.

  50. 50.

    Hirschl and Shachar 2019.

  51. 51.

    Loughlin 2018.

  52. 52.

    Fassbender 2018.

  53. 53.

    Kalb 2017, p. 88.

References

  • Aust H (2019) The shifting role of cities in the global climate change regime: From Paris to Pittsburgh and back? Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 28(1):57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber B R (2013) If Mayors Ruled the World: Dysfunctional Nations, Rising Cities. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber N W (2018) The Principles of Constitutionalism. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauböck R, Orgad L (eds) (2020) Cities vs States: Should Urban Citizenship be Emancipated from Nationality? European University Institute Working Paper RSCAS 16:1–86. https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/66369 Accessed 18 February 2021

  • Blank Y (2006) The City and the World. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 44(3):875–939

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank Y, Rosen-Zvi I (2018) Reviving Federal Regions. Stanford Law Review 70:1895–1993

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggero G (2017) Constitutional Principles of Local Self-Government in Europe. Brill-Nijhoff, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Briffault R (2018), The Challenge of the New Preemption. Stanford Law Review 70:1995–2027

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumke C, Voßkuhle A (2019) German Constitutional Law: Introduction, Cases, Principles. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis S R (1978) The Federal Principle: A Journey Through Time in Quest of a Meaning. University of California Press, Berkeley/Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Elazar D J (1987) Exploring Federalism. University of Alabama Press, Alabama

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassbender B (2018) The State’s Unabandoned Claim to Be the Center of the Legal Universe. International Journal of Constitutional Law 16(4):1207–1214

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida R (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana D (2018) Federal Decentralization. Virginia Law Review 104(4):727–795

    Google Scholar 

  • Frug G (1980) The City as a Legal Concept. Harvard Law Review 93(6):1057–1154

    Google Scholar 

  • Frug G, Barron D J (2008) City Bound: How States Stifle Urban Innovation. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardbaum S (2020) The counter-playbook: Resisting the populist assault on separation of powers. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 59(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerken H (2010) Foreword: Federalism All the Way Down. Harvard Law Review 124(1):6–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerken H, Revesz J (2017) Progressive Federalism: A User’s Guide. Democracy 44. https://democracyjournal.org/magazine/44/progressive-federalism-a-users-guide/ Accessed 27 March 2020

  • Ginsburg T, Huq A Z (2018) How to Save a Constitutional Democracy. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartog H (1983) Public Property and Private Power: The Corporation of the City of New York in American Law 1730-1870. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Himsworth C (2015) The European Charter of Local Self-Government: A Treaty for Local Democracy. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschl R (2020) City, State: Constitutionalism and the Megacity. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschl R, Shachar A (2019) Spatial Statism. International Journal of Constitutional Law 17(2):387–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoornweg D, Pope K (2017) Population Predictions for the World’s Largest Cities in the 21st Century. Environment and Urbanization 29(1):195–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson V C, Tushnet M (2014) Comparative Constitutional Law. Foundation Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalb J (2017) The State of the City and the Future of Human Rights: A Review of Global Urban Justice. Columbia Human Rights Law Review 75:75–97

    Google Scholar 

  • King L (2014) Cities, Subsidiarity and Federalism. In: Fleming J E et al (eds) Federalism and Subsidiarity: NOMOS LV, New York University Press, New York, pp 291–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchmair L (2015) International Law and Public Administration: The European Charter of Local Self-Government. Pro Publico Bono 3:124–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P, Masahisa F (2000) A Monopolistic Competition Model of Urban Systems and Trade. In: Huriot J M et al (eds) Economics of Cities: Theoretical Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 167–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Galès P (2002) European Cities: Social Conflicts and Governance. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre H (1996) The Right to the City. In: Kofman E et al (eds) Writings on Cities. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 63–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy J T (2007) Federalism, Liberalism and the Separation of Loyalties. American Political Science Review 101(3):459–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughlin M (2018) The State: Condition Sine Qua Non. International Journal of Constitutional Law 16(4):1156–1163

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterman R, Schütze R (eds) (2019) The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijman J (2019) The Urban Pushback: International Law as an Instrument of Cities. Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting 113:119–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Oomen B, Davis M F, Grigolo M (eds) (2016) Global Urban Justice: The Rise of Human Rights Cities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Palermo F, Kössler K (2017) Comparative Federalism: Constitutional Arrangements and Case Law. Hart Publishing, Oxford/Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Prak M (2018) Citizens without Nations: Urban Citizenship in Europe and the World, c.1000-1789. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett W E (2017) City Power in a New Era of Localism. Fordham Urban Law Journal 44:1449–1461

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodden J (2019) Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Divide. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld M, Sajó A (eds) (2012) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Samet R H (2013) Complexity, the Science of Cities, and Long-Range Futures. Futures 47:49–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Sansom G, Dawkins J (2013) Australia: Perth and South East Queensland. In: Slack E, Chattopadhyay R (eds) Governance and Finance of Large Metropolitan Areas in Federal Systems. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 10–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen S (2001) The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders C (2005) Constitutional recognition of local government in Australia. In: Steytler N (ed) The Place and Role of Local Government in Federal Systems. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Johannesburg, pp 47–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharff E (2016) Powerful Cities? Limits on Municipal Taxing Authority and What to Do About Them. New York University Law Review 91(2):292–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharff E (2018) Hyper Preemption: A Reordering of the State-Local Relationship? Georgetown Law Journal 106(4):1469–1522

    Google Scholar 

  • Schragger R C (2016) City Power. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schragger R C (2018a) When White Supremacists Invade a City. Virginia Law Review Online 104:58–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Schragger R C (2018b) The Attack on American Cities. Texas Law Review 96(6):1163–1233

    Google Scholar 

  • Spruyt H (1996) The Sovereign State and Its Competitors. Princeton University Press, Princeton/Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl K (2017) Preemption, Federalism and Local Democracy. Fordham Urban Law Journal 44:133–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl K (2020) Local Citizenship in a Global Age. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor P J (2004) World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis. Routledge, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly C (1992) Coercion, Capital and European States, AD 990-1992. Blackwell, Malden/Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushnet M, Fleiner T, Saunders C (eds) (2013) Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • UN DESA (2019) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision. United Nations, New York. https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf Accessed 26 March 2020

  • Weinstock D (2014) Cities and Federalism. In: Fleming J E et al (eds) Federalism and Subsidiarity: NOMOS LV. New York University Press, New York, pp 259–290

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ran Hirschl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hirschl, R. (2021). Urbanization, Megacities, Constitutional Silence. In: Hirsch Ballin, E., van der Schyff, G., Stremler, M., De Visser, M. (eds) European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 2020. European Yearbook of Constitutional Law, vol 2. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-431-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-431-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-6265-430-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6265-431-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics