If the Government Errs, Corporate Losses are Their Own to Bear: Corporate Best Practices for Indigenous Engagement in the Uranium Industry

  • Taymoor M. PilehvarEmail author


Recent case law incentivizes corporations in the Canadian uranium industry to take a proactive role in indigenous consultations. The Canadian Government has a duty to consult indigenous peoples who will be impacted by uranium projects, and certain aspects of that duty, including engaging with the impacted peoples, can be performed by the corporate project proponents. Case law indicates that the Canadian Government is not civilly liable to corporations when inadequate consultation results in costly project delays or other financial losses. Therefore, corporations should adopt an internal policy of best practices to optimize their role in the process. The recommended best practices both increase respect for indigenous rights and decrease the risk of financial loss due to inadequate consultation.


Civil Liability Corporate Engagement Impact Benefit Agreement Indigenous Consultations Indigenous Peoples Traditional Ecological Knowledge Uranium 


  1. Cameco (2016) Sustainable Development Report, Indigenous Peoples Relations.
  2. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (2016) Considering Aboriginal traditional knowledge in environmental assessments conducted under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act – Interim Principles.
  3. Canadian Nuclear Association (2015) Background of Uranium Mining in Canada, Economic Benefits.
  4. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (2011) Codification of Current Practice: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) Commitment to Aboriginal Consultation.
  5. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. (2010) Technical Report on the Geology of, and Results from, the Northwest Manitoba Project #NWM 2010-01, at 20.
  6. CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. (2012) Uranium Exploration in North West Manitoba, at 18.
  7. CBC News (2008) Algonquin bands end alliance in Sharbot Lake uranium protest: One will obey court order, the other will continue defying it, 13 February 2008.
  8. CBC News (2013) Exploration firm sues Ontario for $110M over mining claims Northern Superior Resources wants compensation for potential lost income, 25 October 2013.
  9. CBC News (2014) Cree youth walk 850 km to protest against uranium mining in Quebec, 14 December 2014.
  10. Coates KS (2016) Indigenous Support for Development is Being Heard: Ken Coates in Inside Policy, Macdonald Laurier Institute,
  11. Committee on Uranium Mining in Virginia; Committee on Earth Resources; National Research Council (2011) Potential Environmental Effects of Uranium Mining, Processing, and Reclamation. In: Uranium Mining in Virginia: Scientific, Technical, Environmental, Human Health and Safety, and Regulatory Aspects of Uranium Mining and Processing in Virginia. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 178-222. Available at
  12. Ecosocialism Canada (2010) The impact of uranium mining on indigenous communities.
  13. Government of Canada (2011) Aboriginal Consultation and Accommodation: Updated Guidelines for Federal Officials to Fulfill the Duty to Consult.
  14. Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada (2010) Canada’s Statement of Support on the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
  15. Mining Feeds (2018) Uranium Mining Companies Listed in Canada.
  16. Nikiforuk A (1998) Echoes of the Atomic Age, Cancer kills fourteen aboriginal uranium workers. Calgary Herald (14 March 1998), cited by Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility.
  17. Ritter ARM (2000) The Impacts of Mineral Sector Development on the Community: A Synthesis of the Canadian Experience, at 11. Carleton University Department of Economics and School of International Affairs, OttawaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser press and the authors 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TulsaUSA

Personalised recommendations