Advertisement

Victims in the Witness Stand: Socio-Cultural and Psychological Challenges in Eliciting Victim Testimony

  • Ellie SmithEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Criminal Justice Series book series (ICJS, volume 11)

Abstract

Victim testimony does not occur in a legal vacuum. This chapter explores socio-cultural and psychological barriers that inhibit testimony for victims of international crimes. These barriers can arise at the time of the crime, during the period between the perpetration of the crime and testimony, and during testimony itself, where the psychological impact of trauma has affected the ability of the victim to recall or coherently articulate their experiences. While many of these barriers stem directly from the abuse suffered, actions of the courts, including collective approaches to victim representation, the use of interpreters and intermediaries, and the nature and style of questioning, also have the potential to mediate or inhibit individual testimony. These barriers pose challenges not only for the victim themselves, but also for Prosecution and Defence counsel, victims’ lawyers, victim support personnel and judges in the attainment and assessment of victim evidence.

Keywords

International Criminal Court Testimony Credibility Trauma Psychological impact Memory Sexual violence Rape Contaminated testimony Composite narrative Collective representation 

References

  1. Agger IS et al (2009) Testimonial therapy: A pilot project to improve psychological wellbeing among survivors of torture in India. Torture 19(3):204–217Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association (APA) (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Publishing, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aroche J, Coello MJ (2004) Ethnocultural considerations in treatment of refugees. In: Wilson J, Drozdek B (eds) Broken spirits: The treatment of traumatized asylum seekers, refugees, war and torture victims. Brunner-Routledge, New York, pp 53–80Google Scholar
  4. Baillot H et al [undated] Research briefing: Rape narratives and credibility assessment (of female claimants) at the AIT. http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/law/documents/briefing-papers/research-briefing-rape-narratives-and-credibility-assessment-(of-female-claimants)-at-the-ait.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2014
  5. Basoglu M et al (2005) Psychiatric and cognitive effects of war in former Yugoslavia: Association of lack of redress for trauma and posttraumatic stress reactions. J Am Med Assoc 294(5):580–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bogner D et al (2007) Impact of sexual violence on disclosure during Home Office interviews. Br J Psychiatry 191:75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bremner JD et al (1998) Trauma, memory and dissociation: An integrative formulation. In: Bremner JD et al (eds) Trauma, memory and dissociation. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, p 365Google Scholar
  8. Brewin C (2003) Posttraumatic stress disorder: Malady or myth? Yale University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Brewin C (2015) Re-experiencing traumatic events in PTSD: new avenues in research on intrusive memories and flashbacks. European Journal of Psychotraumatology 6:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brouneus K (2010) The trauma of truth telling: Effects of witnessing in the Rwandan Gacaca Courts on psychological health. J Conflict Resolut 54(3):408–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cameron HE (2010) Refugee status determinations and the limits of memory. Int J Refugee Law 22(4):469–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caruth C (1996) Unclaimed experience: Trauma, narrative and history. John Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  13. Danieli Y (2009) Massive trauma and the healing role of reparative justice. J Trauma Stress 22(5):351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Jong J (2004) Public mental health and culture: Disasters as a challenge to western mental health care models, the self, and PTSD. In: Wilson J, Drozdek B (eds) Broken spirits: The treatment of traumatized asylum seekers, refugees, war and torture victims. Brunner-Routledge, New York, pp 159–178Google Scholar
  15. Doak J (2011) The therapeutic dimension of transitional justice: Emotional repair and victim satisfaction in international trials and truth commissions. International Criminal Law Review 11:263–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duggan C, Abusharaf M (2008) Reparation of sexual violence in democratic transitions. In: De Greiff P (ed) The handbook of reparations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 623–649Google Scholar
  17. Felman S, Laub D (1992) Testimony: Crises of witnessing in literature, psychoanalysis, and history. Routledge Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Grunebaum H, Henri Y (2003) Re-membering bodies, producing histories: Holocaust survivor narrative and Truth and Reconciliation Commission testimony. In: Bennett J, Kennedy R (eds) World memory: Personal trajectories in global time. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 101–118Google Scholar
  19. Hamber B (1995) Do sleeping dogs lie? The psychological implications of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa. Paper presented at the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation, Seminar No. 5 (Johannesburg 26 July 1995)Google Scholar
  20. Hellawell SJ, Brewin CR (2004) A comparison of flashbacks and ordinary autobiographical memories of trauma: content and language. Behav Res Ther 42:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herlihy J, Turner S (2006) Should discrepant accounts given by asylum seekers be taken as proof of deceit? Torture 16(2):81–92Google Scholar
  22. Herlihy J, Turner S (2007) Asylum claims and memory of trauma: sharing our knowledge. Br J Psychiatry 191:3–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Herlihy J et al (2002) Discrepancies in autobiographical memories - implications for the assessment of asylum seekers: repeated interviews study. Br Med J 324:324–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Herman J (1997) Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence—from domestic abuse to political terror. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Hook A, Andrews B (2005) The relationship of non-disclosure in therapy to shame and depression. Br J Clin Psychol 44:425–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Igreja V et al (2004) Testimony method to ameliorate post-traumatic stress symptoms: Community-based intervention study with Mozambican civil war survivors. Br J Psychiatry 184:251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. International Criminal Court (ICC) (2010) Protocol on the vulnerability assessment and support procedure used to facilitate the testimony of vulnerable witnesses. http://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/doc/doc957719.pdf. Accessed 26 January 2015
  28. International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (IRCT) (2007) Psychological evaluations of torture allegations: A practical guide to the Istanbul Protocol—for psychologists. 2nd edn. http://www.irct.org/Files/Filer/publications/psychological_en_web_red.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2014
  29. Janet P (1925) Psychological healings vols 1–2. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Janoff-Bulman R (1992) Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaminer D et al (2001) The Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa: Relation to psychiatric status and forgiveness among survivors of human rights abuses. Br J Psychiatry 178:373–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kelsall M, Stepakoff S (2007) ‘When we wanted to talk about rape’: silencing sexual violence at the Special Court for Sierra Leone. Int J Trans Justice 1:355–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kirchenbauer et al (2013) Victims’ participation before the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia: Baseline study of the Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association’s Civil Party Scheme for Case 002. http://www.eccc.gov.kh/sites/default/files/Victims-participation-before-ECCC-Baseline-Study-Jan-2013.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2014
  34. Leang C, Smith W (2010) The early experience of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Court of Cambodia. In: Bellilli R (ed) International criminal justice: Law and practice from the Rome Statute to its review. Ashgate Publishing, Surrey, pp 143–160Google Scholar
  35. Lecic-Tosevski D, Bakalic J (2004) Against torture—The road to a healthy individual and society. In: Spiric Z, Knezevic G, Jovic V et al (eds) Torture in war: Consequences and rehabilitation of victims—Yugoslav experience. International Aid Network, Belgrade, pp 95–105Google Scholar
  36. Levi P (1979) If this is a man: The truce. Abacus Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Modvig J, Jaranson JM (2004) A global perspective of torture, political violence, and health. In: Wilson J, Drozdek B (eds) Broken spirits: The treatment of traumatized asylum seekers, refugees, war and torture victims. Brunner-Routledge, New York, pp 33–52Google Scholar
  38. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) (2004) Manual on the effective investigation and documentation of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/training8Rev1en.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2014
  39. Peel M (2004) Men as perpetrators and victims. In: Peel (ed) Rape as a method of torture. Medical Foundation for the Care of Victims of Torture, London, pp 61–70Google Scholar
  40. Ramsay R et al (1993) Psychiatric morbidity in survivors of organised state violent including torture. A retrospective series. The British Journal of Psychiatry 162:55–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Raphael B (2003) Early intervention and the debriefing debate. In: Ursano RJ, Fullerton CS, Norwood AE (eds) Terrorism and disaster: Individual and community mental health interventions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 146–161Google Scholar
  42. Rauchfuss K, Schmolze B (2008) Justice heals: The impact of impunity and the fight against it on the recovery of severe human rights violations’ survivors. Torture 18(1):38–50Google Scholar
  43. Rauschenbach M, Scalia D (2008) Victims and international criminal justice. International Review of the Red Cross 90:441–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith E (2012) Investigating rape at the International Criminal Court: The impact of trauma. Issues in International Criminal Justice, Special Volume, pp 99–112Google Scholar
  45. Smith E, Boyles J (2009) Justice denied: The experiences of 100 torture surviving women of seeking justice and rehabilitation. Medical Foundation for the Care of Victims of Torture, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith E et al (2010) A remedy for torture survivors in international law: Interpreting rehabilitation. Medical Foundation for the Care of Victims of Torture, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Stover E, Balthazard M, Koenig KA (2011) Confronting Duch: Civil party participation in Case 001 at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. International Review of the Red Cross 93:503–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sveaass N, Lavik NL (2000) Psychological aspects of human rights violations: The importance of justice and reconciliation. Nordic Journal of International Law 69(1):35–52Google Scholar
  49. Van der Kolk BA (1996) Trauma and memory. In: Van der Kolk B, MacFarlane A, Weisaeth L (eds) The effects of overwhelming experiences on mind, body and society. Guildford Press, New York, pp 279–302Google Scholar
  50. Van der Kolk BA, Fisler R (1995) Dissociation and the fragmentary nature of traumatic memories: Overview and exploratory study. J Trauma Stress 8(4):505–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Van der Kolk BA, Van der Hart O (1995) The intrusive past: The flexibility of memory and the engraving of trauma. In: Carruth C (ed) Trauma: Explorations in memory. John Hopkins University Press, London, pp 158–182Google Scholar
  52. Van Velsen C et al (1996) Survivors of torture and organized violence: demography and diagnosis. J Trauma Stress 9:181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Women’s Initiative for Gender Justice (2014) Gender report card on the International Criminal Court 2013. http://www.iccwomen.org/documents/Gender-Report-Card-on-the-ICC-2013.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2014
  54. Zehr H (2005) Changing lenses: A new focus for crime and justice, 3rd edn. Herald Press, ScottsdaleGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NewcastleUK

Personalised recommendations