The FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players: Transnational Law-Making in the Shadow of Bosman

  • Antoine DuvalEmail author
Part of the ASSER International Sports Law Series book series (ASSER)


This chapter retraces the emergence of a new FIFA transfer system in the wake of the Bosman ruling. It purposes to show the complexity and plurality of the legal game surrounding the regulation of global football. After the Bosman ruling many believed it was a comeback of the state in the self-regulatory sphere of sports regulation. Yet, the legal interaction between EU law and the private rules of FIFA regulating the transfers of football players across borders is more intricate. As we will show, the FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (FIFA RSTP) put in place after the Bosman ruling were negotiated under the shadow of an EU Competition law investigation triggered by the EU Commission. These negotiations involving a wide range of actors ended in 2001 with an agreement signed between the EU Commission and UEFA and FIFA. Thereafter, a reformed transnational system was put in place by FIFA to regulate international transfers of football players and enshrined in the FIFA RSTP. This legislative story illustrates the public-private nature of transnational law-making in the sporting world. Instead of perceiving these transnational rules as purely self-regulatory or purely subjected to national or European law, this case study demonstrates that we need to better grasp the fact that in reality both orientations are in tension and impossible to disentangle.


FIFA FIFA RSTP Bosman Lex sportiva Sports law EU law Legal pluralism Court of arbitration for sport Arbitration 


  1. Azoulai L (2011) The ‘retained powers’ formula in the case law of the European Court of Justice: EU law as total law? Eur J Legal Stud 4(2):192–219Google Scholar
  2. Beck U (2005) Power in the global age: a new global political economy. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernstein L (1992) Opting out of the legal system: extralegal contractual relations in the diamond industry. J Legal Stud 21(1):115–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanpain R (2003) The legal status of sportsmen and sportswomen under international, European and Belgian national and regional law. Kluwer Law International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  5. Burger L (2012) For the first time, the Supreme Court sets aside an arbitral award on grounds of substantive public policy. ASA Bull 30(3):603–610Google Scholar
  6. Casini L (2010) Il Diritto Globale dello Sport. Giuffrè editoreGoogle Scholar
  7. Casini L (2011) The making of a lex sportiva by the court of arbitration for sport. Ger Law J 12(5):1317–1340Google Scholar
  8. Casini L (2015) The emergence of global administrative systems: the case of sport. Glocalism J Cult Polit Innov 1:1–18Google Scholar
  9. Coppo G (2011) Contractual stability and EU competition law. Eur Sports Law Policy Bull 1:291–309Google Scholar
  10. Croci O, Ammirante J (1999) Soccer in the age of globalization. Peace Rev 11(4):499–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Czernota PA (2013) FIFA transfer rules and unilateral termination without “just cause”. Berkeley J Entertainment Sports Law 2(1):1–47Google Scholar
  12. Dabscheck B (2004) The globe at their feet: FIFA’s new employment rules—I. Sport Soc Cult Commer Media Polit 7(1):69–94Google Scholar
  13. Dabscheck B (2006) The globe at their feet: FIFA’s new employment rules—II. Sport Soc Cult Commer Media Polit 9(1):1–18Google Scholar
  14. De Weger F (2008) The jurisprudence of the FIFA dispute resolution chamber. T.M.C. Asser Press, The HagueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drolet J-C (2006) Extra time: are the new FIFA transfer rules doomed? Int Sports Law J 2006(1–2):66–73Google Scholar
  16. Dunne N (2014) Commitment decisions in EU competition law. J Compet Law Econ 10(2):399–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duval A (2013) Lex sportiva: a playground for transnational law. Eur Law J 19(6):822–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duval A (2015a) La Lex Sportiva face à L’Union européenne: Guerre et Paix dans l’espace juridique transnational. PhD Thesis, European University Institute, FlorenceGoogle Scholar
  19. Duval A (2015b) The court of arbitration for sport and EU law: chronicle of an encounter. Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 22(2):224–255Google Scholar
  20. Duval A, Van Rompuy B (2016) Protecting athletes’ right to fair trial through EU competition law: the Pechstein case. In: Takács T, Lazić V, Van Rompuy B (eds) Paulussen C., Fundamental rights in international and European law: public and private law perspectives. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, pp 245–278Google Scholar
  21. Egger A, Stix-Hackl C (2002) Sports and competition law: a never-ending story? Eur Compet Law Rev 23(2):81–91Google Scholar
  22. Eliasson A (2009) The European football market, globalization and mobility among players. Soccer Soc 10(3–4):386–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foster K (2010) Lex sportiva: transnational law in action. Int Sports Law J 2010(3–4):20–25Google Scholar
  24. Frick B (2009) Globalization and factor mobility the impact of the ‘‘Bosman-ruling’’ on player migration in professional soccer. J Sports Econ 10(1):88–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garapon A (2013) Michel Foucault, visionnaire du droit contemporain. Raisons politiques 52:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. García B (2007) UEFA and the European Union: from confrontation to co-operation? J Contemp Eur Res 3(3):202–223Google Scholar
  27. Giulianotti R, Robertson R (2004) The globalization of football: a study in the glocalization of the ‘serious life’. Br J Sociol 55(4):545–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haas U (2014) The enforcement of football-related arbitral awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). Int Sports Law Rev 1:12–29Google Scholar
  29. Ibáñez Colomo P (2010) On the application of competition law as regulation: elements for a theory. Yearb Eur Law 29(1):261–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ibañez Colomo P (2013) Three shifts in EU competition policy: towards standards decentralization, settlements. Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 20(3):363–384Google Scholar
  31. Idot L (1999) A propos des engagements en droit de la concurrence: quelques réflexions sur la pratique communautaire et française. Cahiers de Droit Européen 4:569–610Google Scholar
  32. Irving JG (2002) Red card: the battle over European football’s transfer system. Univ Miami Law Rev 56:667–725Google Scholar
  33. Kaufmann-Kohler G (2007) Arbitral precedent: dream, necessity or excuse? Arbitr Int 23(3):357–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kingsbury B, Krisch N, Steward RB (2005) The emergence of global administrative law. Law Contemp Probl 68:15–62Google Scholar
  35. Latty F (2007) La Lex Sportiva: Recherche Sur Le Droit Transnational. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Latty F (2011) La Lex FIFA. In: Maisonneuve M (ed) Droit et Coupe du Monde, Economica, pp 9–27Google Scholar
  37. Legrand P (1997) Against a European civil code. Mod Law Rev 60(1):44–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Levy R (2012) Swiss federal tribunal overrules CAS award in a landmark decision: FIFA vs Matuzalem. Int Sports Law J 2012(1–2):35–38Google Scholar
  39. Maisonneuve M (2011) L’arbitrage des litiges sportifs. La Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, ParisGoogle Scholar
  40. Mehta K, Tierno Centella M-L (2008) Settlement procedure in EU cartel cases. Compet Law Int 4:11–18Google Scholar
  41. Meier HE, García B (2013) Abandoning hopes for veto power: institutional options for sport governing bodies in the European Union. Int J Sport Policy Polit 5(3):421–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meier HE, García B (2015) Protecting private transnational authority against public intervention: FIFA’s power over national governments. Public Adm 93(4):890–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Milanovic B (2005) Globalization and goals: does soccer show the way? Rev Int Polit Econ 12(5):828–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Monti G (2002) Article 81 EC and public policy. Common Mark Law Rev 39(5):1057–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Niemann A, Garcia B, Grant W (2011) The transformation of European football: towards the Europeanisation of the national game. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Keeffe D, Osborne P (1996) L’affaire Bosman: un arrêt important pour le bon fonctionnement du Marché unique européen. Revue du Marché Unique Européen 1:17–44Google Scholar
  47. Orth JF (2015) Entscheidungsvollzug in der Verbandspyramide und Ausbildungsentschädigung. Sport und Recht 2:51–56Google Scholar
  48. Ost F, Van de Kerchove M (2002) De la pyramide au réseau? Pour une théorie dialectique du droit. Publications des Facultés Universitaires Saint Louis, BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  49. Parrish R (2003) Sports law and policy in the European Union. Manchester University Press, ManchesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Parrish R (2015) Article 17 of the FIFA regulations on the status and transfer of players. Compatibility with EU law. Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 22(2):256–282Google Scholar
  51. Pearson G (2015) Sporting justifications under EU free movement and competition law: the case of the football ‘transfer system’. Eur Law J 21(2):220–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Polanyi K (2011) The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  53. Rigaux F (1989) Les situations juridiques individuelles dans un système de relativité générale: cours général de droit international privé. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  54. Rigozzi A (2010) Challenging awards of the Court of Arbitration for Sport. J Int Dispute Settl 1(1):217–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rosanvallon P (2008) Counter-democracy. Politics in an age of distrust. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sassen S (1996) Losing control? Sovereignty in an age of globalization. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Sassen S (2006) Territory—authority—rights: from medieval to global assemblages. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  58. Steingruber AM (2010) Sports arbitration: determination of the applicable regulations and rules of law and their interpretation. Int Sports Law J 3–4:54–68Google Scholar
  59. Steingruber AM (2012) Matuzalem: CAS award set aside on the ground on public policy: de facto unlimited prohibition to work as a football player as a violation of public policy. Int Sports Law J 2012(1–2):9–44Google Scholar
  60. Taylor M (2006) Global players? Football, migration and globalization, c. 1930–2000. Hist Soc Res 31(1):7–30Google Scholar
  61. Teubner G (1983) Substantive and reflexive elements. Mod Law, Law Soc Rev 17(2):239–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Teubner G (1997a) ‘Global Bukowina’: legal pluralism in the world society. In: Teubner G (ed) Global law without the state. Darmouth, Aldershot, pp 3–22Google Scholar
  63. Teubner G (ed) (1997b) Global law without the state. Dartmouth, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  64. Teubner G (2010a) Constitutionalising polycontexturality. Soc Legal Stud 20(2):210–229Google Scholar
  65. Teubner G (2010b) Societal constitutionalism and the politics of the common. Finnish Yearb Int Law 21:2–15Google Scholar
  66. Teubner G (2012) Constitutional fragments: societal constitutionalism and globalization. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vallery A (2008) Les procédures de règlement négocié de la Commission européenne en matière de concurrence: entre flexibilité et sécurité juridique. In: De Walsche A, Levi L (eds) Mélanges en hommage à Georges Vandersanden. Bruylant, Bruxelles, pp 734–770Google Scholar
  68. Van den Bogaert S (2015) Bosman: one for all…. Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 22(2):174–179Google Scholar
  69. Van Miert K (1996) L’arrêt “Bosman”: la suppression des frontières sportives dans le Marché unique européen. Revue du Marché Unique Européen 1:5–9Google Scholar
  70. Van Miert K (2000) Mijn Jaren in Europa. Lannoo, TieltGoogle Scholar
  71. Van Rompuy B (2015) The role of EU competition law in tackling abuse of regulatory power by sports associations. Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 22(2):179–208Google Scholar
  72. Von Daniels D (2010) The concept of law from a transnational perspective. Ashgate Publishing Limited, SurreyGoogle Scholar
  73. Walker N (2014) Intimations of global law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  74. Weatherill S (2003) “Fair play please!”: recent developments in the application of EC law to sport. Common Mark Law Rev 40(1):51–93Google Scholar
  75. Weatherill S (2010) Bosman changed everything: the rise of EC sports law. In: Maduro M, Azoulai L (eds) The past and future of EU law. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 480–487Google Scholar
  76. Wills WPJ (2006) Settlements of EU antitrust investigations: commitment decisions under Article 9 of Regulation No 1/2003. World Compet 29(3):345–366Google Scholar
  77. Zimmerman M (2015) Vertragsstabilität im internationalen Fussball. Dike Verlag, Zürich/St. GallenGoogle Scholar
  78. Zumbansen P (2010) Transnational legal pluralism. Transnatl Legal Theory 1(2):141–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zumbansen P (2012a) Defining the space of transnational law: legal theory, global governance and legal pluralism. In: Handl G, Zekoll J, Zumbansen P (eds) Beyond territoriality: transnational legal authority in an age of globalization. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, pp 53–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zumbansen P (2012b) Transnational law evolving. In: Smits J (ed) Elgar encyclopedia of comparative law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 898–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zumbansen P (2014) The incurable constitutional itch: transnational private regulatory governance and the woes of legitimacy. Osgoode legal studies research paper series, Paper No. 18 10:6:1–28Google Scholar
  82. Zumbansen P, Callies G-P (2010) Rough consensus and running codes. Hart Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European and International Sports LawT.M.C. Asser InstituteThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations