Advertisement

Introduction

  • Antoine Duval
  • Ben Van RompuyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the ASSER International Sports Law Series book series (ASSER)

Abstract

In this introduction to the edited volume, The Legacy of Bosman. Revisiting the relationship between EU law and sport, we provide some background on the aim and methodology of the book. We start by outlining the reasons for exploring the legal and political transformations triggered by the Bosman judgment over the last 20 years and beyond. Most importantly, we argue for a shift in the way the ruling is commonly interpreted. The Bosman decision of the CJEU is widely perceived in the literature and in public opinion as a deregulatory intervention by the Court. This, in our view, is a misconception that necessitates a re-reading of the ruling. We suggest that the Bosman case is displaying a democratic ethos. The duty of justification it imposes on the transnational private regulations of sports governing bodies is of a genuine ‘counter-democratic’ nature. The last part of the introduction offers a short overview of the chapters included in the book.

Keywords

Bosman EU law Lex sportiva Sports law Free movement Competition law 

References

  1. Azoulai L, Maduro MP (2010) The past and future of EU law. The classics of EU law revisited on the 50th anniversary of the Rome Treaty. Hart Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck U (2005) Power in the global age: a new global political economy. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck U, Grande E (2007) Cosmopolitan Europe. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Duval A (2015a) The Court of Arbitration for Sport and EU law: Chronicle of an encounter. Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 22(2):224–255Google Scholar
  5. Duval A (2015b) La Lex Sportiva face à L’Union européenne: Guerre et Paix dans l’espace juridique transnational. PhD Thesis, European University Institute, FlorenceGoogle Scholar
  6. Duval A, Van Rompuy B (2016) Protecting athletes’ right to fair trial through EU competition law: the Pechstein case. In: Takács T, Lazić V, Van Rompuy B (eds) Paulussen C., Fundamental rights in international and European Law: public and private law perspectivesT.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, pp 245–278Google Scholar
  7. García B, Weatherill S (2012) Engaging with the EU in order to minimize its impact: sport and the negotiation of the Treaty of Lisbon. J Eur Public Policy 19:238–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Habermas J (2001) The postnational constellation. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  9. James M, Osborn G (2011) London 2012 and the impact of the UK’s olympic and paralympic legislation: protecting commerce or preserving culture? Mod Law Rev 74:410–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Manzella A (2002) La dérégulation du football par l’Europe. Pouvoirs 101:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Meier H-E, García B (2015) Protecting private transnational authority against public intervention: FIFA’s power over national governments. Public Adm 93:890–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Menon A, Weatherill S (2008) Transnational legitimacy in a globalising world: how the European Union rescues its states. West Eur Politics 31:397–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ranc D (2011) Foreign players and football supporters: the old firm, Arsenal. Manchester University Press, Manchester, Paris Saint-GermainGoogle Scholar
  14. Rosanvallon P (2008) Counter-democracy. Politics in an age of distrust. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Teubner G (1983) Substantive and reflexive elements. Mod Law, Law Soc Rev 17(2):239–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Teubner G (2012) Constitutional fragments: societal constitutionalism and globalization. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zylberstein J (2008) The specificity of sport: a concept under threat. In: Blanpain R, Colucci M, Hendrickx F (eds) The future of sports law in the European Union. Beyond the EU reform treaty and the white paper. Kluwer Law International, The Hague, pp 95–106Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European and International Sports LawT.M.C. Asser InstituteThe HagueThe Netherlands
  2. 2.T.M.C. Asser InstituutThe HagueThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Vrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselBelgium

Personalised recommendations