Conclusion: Pitfalls and Potentials of Exit Studies and Practices

Part of the NL ARMS book series (NLARMS)


Th is chapter presents the main conclusions of this book, organised around three questions: 1) “What is exit?” 2) “How can we understand exit?” and 3) “What can we do about exit?”


Exit strategy Military transition End dates End states Political-military relations 


  1. Apter D (ed) (1997) Th e Legitimization of Violence. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhatia MV (2005) Fighting words: naming terrorists, bandits, rebels and other violent actors. Third World Quarterly, 26, 1: 5-22Google Scholar
  3. Caplan R (2012) Policy Implications. In: Caplan R (ed) Exit Strategies and State Building, Oxford University Press, New York, pp 311-319Google Scholar
  4. Flavin W (2003) Planning for Confl ict termination and Post-Confl ict Success, Parameters: 95-112Google Scholar
  5. Jabri V (1996) Discourses on violence: confl ict analysis reconsidered. Manchester University Press, Manchester and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Paris R, Sisk T (2009) Conclusion: confronting the contradictions. In: Paris R and Sisk T (eds) Th e Dilemmas of Statebuilding, Routledge, London and New York, pp 304-315Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Netherlands Defence AcademyBredaThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations