Ex©iting Dilemma: A Defence Economics View on a US Exit from NATO

Chapter
Part of the NL ARMS book series (NLARMS)

Abstract

This chapter studies an exit dilemma from a defence economic perspective on alliances, more specifically against a background of burden sharing theories on NATO. We consider an international alliance, NATO, to be a community programmed to receive, as once membership has been obtained, no country has ever exited, either under pressure or voluntarily.

Keywords

Burden sharing defence economics NATO Gross Domestic Product 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bogers M, Beeres R (2013) Mission Afghanistan: Who Bears the Heaviest Burden. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy 19:32-55Google Scholar
  2. CIA (2015) The world fact book. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/theworld-factbook. Accessed 16 March 2015
  3. Collier P (2010) Wars, guns votes. Democracy in dangerous places. HarperCollins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Gates R (2011) The security and defense agenda (Future of NATO) http://www.defense.gov/speeches/Speech.aspx?speechid=1581. Accessed 16 March 2015
  5. Hartley K (2011) Th e costs of conflict: UK experience in Afghanistan and Iraq, Contributions to Conflict Management, Peace Economics and Development 16:73-83Google Scholar
  6. Hartley K, Sandler T (1999) NATO burden sharing: past and future. Journal of Peace Research 36:665-680Google Scholar
  7. Hillison JR (2009) New members, new burdens: Burden sharing within NATO (PhD Dissertation), Temple University, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaplan LS (1999) Th e long entanglement. NATO’s first fifty years. Preager, WestportGoogle Scholar
  9. Khanna J, Sandler T (1997) Conscription, peace-keeping, and foreign assistance: NATO burden sharing in the post‐cold war era. Defence and peace economics 8:101-121Google Scholar
  10. Kollias C (2008) A preliminary investigation of the burden sharing aspects of a European Union common defence policy, Defence and Peace Economics 19:253-263Google Scholar
  11. McNamara RS (1996) In retrospect. The tragedy and lessons of Vietnam. Vintage Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. NATO (1949-2014). Information on Defence Expenditures. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_49198.htm?selectedLocale=en. Accessed 16 March 2015
  13. NATO (2014) Wales Summit Declaration. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm. Accessed 13 February 2015
  14. Olson Jr M, Zeckhauser, R (1966) An economic theory of alliances, The Review of Economics and Statistics 48:266-279Google Scholar
  15. Oneal JR (1990) Th e theory of collective action and burden sharing in NATO, International Organization 44:379-402Google Scholar
  16. Oneal JR, Elrod M (1989) NATO burden sharing and the forces of change, International Studies Quarterly 33:435-456Google Scholar
  17. Russett BM (1970) What price vigiliance?, Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  18. Sandler T (1977) Impurity of defense: An application to the economics of alliances, Kyklos 20:443-460Google Scholar
  19. Sandler T, Cauley J (1975) On the economic theory of alliances, Journal of conflict resolution, 19:330-348Google Scholar
  20. Sandler T, Forbes JF (1980) Burden sharing, strategy, and the design of NATO, Economic Inquiry, 18:425-444Google Scholar
  21. Sandler T, Shimizu H (2014) NATO burden sharing 1999–2010: an altered alliance, Foreign Policy Analysis 10:43-60Google Scholar
  22. Shimizu H, Sandler T (2002) Peacekeeping and burden sharing, 1994-2000, Journal of Peace Research 39:651-668Google Scholar
  23. Solomon B (2004) NATO burden sharing revisited, Defence and Peace Economics, 15:251-258Google Scholar
  24. Solomon, B (2005) NATO benefits, burdens and borders: reply, Defence and Peace Economics, 16:323-326Google Scholar
  25. Thielemann ER (2003) Between interest and norms: Explaining burden sharing in the European Union, Journal of Refugee Studies 16:253-273Google Scholar
  26. Thies, WJ (1987) Alliances and Collective Goods A Reappraisal, Journal of Conflict Resolution 31:298-332Google Scholar
  27. Trading economics (2000-2013) Trading economics. http://www.tradingeconomics.com. Accessed 16 March 2015

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Netherlands Defence AcademyBredaThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations