Assessing the Adequacy of a Privacy Legal Framework
This chapter introduces the fundamental principles of privacy; explains the purpose and meaning of each principle; clarifies why these principles will serve as the basis of the book’s criteria for assessing the adequacy of a privacy legal framework; and clarifies that the existing privacy principles are still applicable.
KeywordsOECD privacy guidelines Fair information practice principles Core principles of privacy
- Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP187, Opinion 15/2011 on the definition of consent, Adopted on 13 July 2011Google Scholar
- Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP 173, Opinion 3/2010 on the principle of accountability, Adopted on 13 July 2010Google Scholar
- Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Discussion document WP 4 (5020/97), First orientations on transfers of personal data to third countries—possible ways forward in assessing adequacyGoogle Scholar
- Bennett C (1992) Regulating privacy: data protection and public policy in Europe and the United States. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
- Bignami F (2010) The non-Americanization of European regulatory styles: data privacy regulation in France, Germany, Italy, and Britain. Center for European studies working paper series #174Google Scholar
- Birnhack MD (2008) The EU data protection directive: an engine of a global regime. Tel Aviv University Law Faculty Papers, Paper 95Google Scholar
- Kirby M (Hon Justice) (1999) Privacy protection, a new beginning: OECD principles 20 years on. Priv Law Policy Rep 6(3):25–29, at 27, available at: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/PLPR/1999/41.html. Accessed 24 February 2014.
- Reidenberg J (2000) Privacy protection and the interdependence of law, technology and self-regulationGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz PM (1999) Privacy and democracy in cyberspace. Vanderbilt Law Rev 52:1609Google Scholar
- Schwartz PM (2000) Beyond Lessig’s code for internet privacy: cyberspace filters, privacy-control, and fair information practices. Wisconsin Law Rev 2000(4):743–787Google Scholar
- Tamanaha B (2004) On the rule of law: history, politics, theory. Cambridge University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Taylor N (2002) State surveillance and the right to privacy. Surveill Soc 1(1):66–85Google Scholar
- Tzanou M (2010) The EU as an emerging surveillance society: the function creep case study and challenges to privacy and data protection. Vienna J Int Const Law 4:407–227Google Scholar