Assessing the Adequacy of a Privacy Legal Framework

  • Demetrius Klitou
Part of the Information Technology and Law Series book series (ITLS, volume 25)


This chapter introduces the fundamental principles of privacy; explains the purpose and meaning of each principle; clarifies why these principles will serve as the basis of the book’s criteria for assessing the adequacy of a privacy legal framework; and clarifies that the existing privacy principles are still applicable.


OECD privacy guidelines Fair information practice principles Core principles of privacy 


  1. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP187, Opinion 15/2011 on the definition of consent, Adopted on 13 July 2011Google Scholar
  2. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP 173, Opinion 3/2010 on the principle of accountability, Adopted on 13 July 2010Google Scholar
  3. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Discussion document WP 4 (5020/97), First orientations on transfers of personal data to third countries—possible ways forward in assessing adequacyGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett C (1992) Regulating privacy: data protection and public policy in Europe and the United States. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  5. Bignami F (2010) The non-Americanization of European regulatory styles: data privacy regulation in France, Germany, Italy, and Britain. Center for European studies working paper series #174Google Scholar
  6. Birnhack MD (2008) The EU data protection directive: an engine of a global regime. Tel Aviv University Law Faculty Papers, Paper 95Google Scholar
  7. Kirby M (Hon Justice) (1999) Privacy protection, a new beginning: OECD principles 20 years on. Priv Law Policy Rep 6(3):25–29, at 27, available at: Accessed 24 February 2014.
  8. Reidenberg J (2000) Privacy protection and the interdependence of law, technology and self-regulationGoogle Scholar
  9. Schwartz PM (1999) Privacy and democracy in cyberspace. Vanderbilt Law Rev 52:1609Google Scholar
  10. Schwartz PM (2000) Beyond Lessig’s code for internet privacy: cyberspace filters, privacy-control, and fair information practices. Wisconsin Law Rev 2000(4):743–787Google Scholar
  11. Tamanaha B (2004) On the rule of law: history, politics, theory. Cambridge University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Taylor N (2002) State surveillance and the right to privacy. Surveill Soc 1(1):66–85Google Scholar
  13. Tzanou M (2010) The EU as an emerging surveillance society: the function creep case study and challenges to privacy and data protection. Vienna J Int Const Law 4:407–227Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the author(s) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations