Skip to main content

Weaving the Threads of Practice and Research

Reflections on Fundamental Features of Action Research

  • Chapter
Promoting Change through Action Research

Abstract

In his seminal work, which many still argue marked the origins of action research (Adelman, 1993), Kurt Lewin articulately made the case for an interventionist form of research famously stating: “research which produces nothing but books will not suffice” (Lewin, 1946, p. 35). In this Lewin was making the case not only for research which was sensitive to the particular nature of specific contexts but also, arising from this contextually sensitive, for research as a means to achieved change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adelman, C. (1975). The function of classroom observation within the methodology of the ford teaching project. British Educational Research Journal, 1(2), 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adelman, C. (1993). Kurt Lewin and the origins of action research. Educational Action Research, 1(1), 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., McNamara, O., & Gilroy, P. (2004). Practitioner research and professional development in education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical. education, knowledge and action research. London: Routledge Farmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J. (1945). United States Indian Administration as a laboratory of ethnic relations. Social Research, 12(3), 265–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corey, S. (1953). Action research to improve school practices. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers. The challenge of lifelong learning. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, C., & Hadfield, M. (2004). Learning through networks: Trust, partnerships and the power of action research. Educational Action Research, 12(4), 575–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, C., & Townsend, A. (2009). Practitioner action research: building and sustaining success through networked learning communities. In S. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Educational Action Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1920). Democracy and education. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gedžūne, I., & Gedžūne, G. (2013). Educational action research to initiate discourse on inclusion in an e-learning environment in teacher education. Educational Action Research, 21(1), 72–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, P. (2014). Deliberation, capability and action research: Knowledge and becoming. Educational Action Research, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunz, J. (1996). Jacob L. Moreno and the origins of action research. Educational Action Research, 4(1), 145–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, D., & Schifter, D. (2001). Practices of inquiry in teaching and research. Cognition and Instruction, 19(4), 441–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (2004). Action Research: A contradiction in terms? Oxford Review of Education, 30(2), 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, A. J., & Townsend, A. (2010). Interviewing as educational research method(s). In D. Hartas (Ed.), Educational research and inquiry (pp. 223–238). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajamaa, A. (2012). Enriching action research with the narrative approach and activity theory: analyzing the consequences of an intervention in a public sector hospital in Finland. Educational Action Research, 20(1), 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1982). The action research planner. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koshy, V. (2005). Action research for improving practice: A practical guide. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitch, R., & Day, C. (2000). Action research and reflective practice: Towards a holistic view. Educational Action Research, 8(1), 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marrow, A. J. (1969). The practical theorist: The life and work of Kurt Lewin. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, C., Black-Hawkins, K., Brindley, S., McIntyre, D., & Taber, K. (2006). Researching schools: Stories from a schools–university partnership for educational research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, C., Black-Hawkins, K., McIntyre, D., & Townsend, A. (2007). Networking practitioner research. Abingdon, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliam, E. (2004). W(h)ither practitioner research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 31(2), 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, J. (1953). Who shall survive? (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Beacon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilsen, E. H. (2006). But let us not forget John Collier. Action Research, 4(4), 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1991). The reflective practitioner. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessema, K. A. (2012). The rocky terrain between delocalized and localized, duplication and originality: Learning to write and learning to teach academic English. Educational action research, 20(4), 515–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, A. (2010). Action research. In D. Hartas (Ed.), Educational research and inquiry: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (pp. 131–145). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, A. (2013a). Action research: The challenges of understanding and changing practice. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, A. (2013b). Rethinking networks in education: Case studies of organisational development networks in neoliberal contexts. Interchange, 43(4), 343–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, R. (1989). Learning from experience. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Townsend, A. (2014). Weaving the Threads of Practice and Research. In: Rauch, F., Schuster, A., Stern, T., Pribila, M., Townsend, A. (eds) Promoting Change through Action Research. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-803-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics