Skip to main content

Scientific Inquiry/Engineering Design

  • Chapter
A Few of Our Favorite Things

Abstract

Engaging students in science inquiry (SI) is nothing new. Flick and Lederman (2006) cited from the US Bureau of Education in 1893 stressing the need for hands-on science instruction. A Framework for K-12 Science Education (Framework) (NRC, 2012) has re-examined what it means to engage students in inquiry and has shifted or refocused attention to include engineering practices (EP) and to replace the idea of “skills” with “practices” (p. 41).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Chapter 4

References:

  • Flick, L., & Lederman, N. G., (Eds.) (2006). Scientific inquiry and Nature of Science. Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education. The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, C. M., Bloom, M. A. & Binns, I. C. (2013). Lights, camera, action: Developing a methodology to document mainstream films’ portrayal of nature of science and scientific inquiry. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 17(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, H., & Nelson, T. H. (1998). Shifting from activitymania to inquiry. Science and Children, 35(4), 14–17, 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Next Generation Science Standards. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states (Vol 1) Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Next Generation Science Standards. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states (Vol 2) Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

Additional Readings:

  • Bell, R. L. (2008). Teaching the nature of science through process skills: Activities for grades 3–8. Pearson Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

Additional Readings:

  • Tsupros, N., Kohler, R., & Hallinen, J. (2009). STEM education: A project to identify the missing components. Intermediate Unit 1: Center for STEM Education and Leonard Gelfand Center for Service Learning and Outreach, Carnegie Mellon University, PA.

    Google Scholar 

Additional Readings:

  • Bayer Corporation. (2010). Planting the seeds for a diverse U.S. STEM pipeline: A compendium of best practice K-12 STEM education programs. Retrieved from http://www.bayerus.com/msms/web_docs/STEM_Forum_2006_COMPENDIUM.pdf

  • Hayden, K., Ouyang, Y., Scinski, L., Olszewski, B., & Bielefeldt, T. (2011). Increasing student interest and attitudes in STEM: Professional development and activities to engage and inspire learners. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 11(1), 99–121.

    Google Scholar 

Additional Readings:

  • Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In W. McComas (Ed.). The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp.83–126). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. (1996). Ten myths of science: Reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 96, 10–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

References:

  • Constraints Report. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.mae.buffalo.edu/courses/mae459/design-info/ConstraintsReport.ppt.

  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, A., & Rivera, R. (2010). Rocks, jeans, and busy machines: An engineering kids storybook. San Antonio, TX: Rivera Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Cleave, J. (2007). Engineering for every kid: Easy activities that make learning science fun. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons..

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morrell, P.D., Popejoy, K. (2014). Scientific Inquiry/Engineering Design. In: Morrell, P.D., Popejoy, K. (eds) A Few of Our Favorite Things. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-779-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics