Investigating Mathematical Creativity in Elementary School through the Lens of Complexity Theory
This chapter explores the practical application of complexity theory to the investigation of mathematical creativity in elementary school classrooms. While previous studies have investigated ways of assessing students’ potential for mathematical creativity (Lee, Hwang, & Seo, 2003; Mann, 2009) and specific ways of promoting mathematical creativity (e.g. Levav-Waynberg & Leiken, 2012 ), this study investigates mathematical creativity as it emerges in classrooms as part of the regular lesson.
KeywordsInternal Diversity Complexity Theory Decimal Point Divergent Thinking Mathematical Creativity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Axelrod, R., & Cohen, M. D. (1999). Harnessing complexity: Organizational implications of a scientific frontier. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Prediger, S. (2006). Diversity of theories in mathematics education—how can we deal with it? ZDM Mathematics Education, 38, 52–57.Google Scholar
- Casti, J. L. (1994). Complexification: Explaining a paradoxical world through the science of surprise. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
- Lee, K. S., Hwang, D., & Seo, J. J. (2003). A development of the test for mathematical creative problem solving ability. Journal of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education Series D: Research in Mathematical Education, 7, 163–189.Google Scholar
- Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Berman and B. Koichu (Eds.) Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 129–135), Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
- Liljedahl, P. & Sriraman, B. (2006). Musings on mathematical creativity. For the Learning of Mathematics, 26, 17–19.Google Scholar
- O’Day, J. (2002). Complexity, accountability, and school improvement. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 293–329.Google Scholar
- Paulus, P. B., Larey, T. S., & Dzindolet, M. T. (2000). Creativity in groups and teams. In M. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research (pp. 319–338). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar