Skip to main content

The Innovative School as an Environment for the Design of Educational Innovations

  • Chapter
Finnish Innovations and Technologies in Schools

Abstract

Teachers’ engagement in Design Based Research (DBR) is analyzed in the context of the Innovative School (ISC) model. The ISC model emphasizes the development of students’ learning and learning environments, teachers’ professionalism, leadership and partnerships. The model engages teachers, students, school principals, parents, and actors of the local community in the design and adoption of educational innovations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Biesta, G. J. J., & Burbules, N. C. (2003). Pragmatism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., & Donovan, S. M. (2005). How students learn science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V, Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Steca, P. (2003). Efficacy beliefs as determinants of teachers’ job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 821-832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 473-490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, W. H., Huan, V. S., Wong, I., Klassen, R. M., & Allison, D. K. (2010). The relationships among school types, teacher efficacy beliefs, and academic climate: Perspective from Asian middle schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 103, 183-190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916/1980). Democracy and education. A. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works 1899-1924, vol. 9. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuFour, R. (2004). What is a “professional learning community”? Educational Leadership, 61, 6-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105-121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 598-628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L. (2009). School, family, and community partnerships (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2013). Survey of schools: ICT in education benchmarking access, use and attitudes to technology in Europe’s schools. Final Report. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=1800

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1994). Classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 493-541). New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY and London, UK: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, S. G., & Muijs, D. (2010). School leadership effectiveness. The growing insight in the importance of school leadership for the quality and development of schools and their pupils. In S. G. Huber (Ed.), School leadership – International perspectives (pp. 79-100). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juuti, K., & Lavonen, J. (2006). Design-based research in science education: One step towards methodology. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 4, 54-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, T., & Lavonen, J. (2014). Crossing school-family boundaries through the use of technology. In H. Niemi, J. Multisilta, & E. Löfström (Eds.), Crossing boundaries for learning – Through technology and human efforts (pp. 37-66).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukkonen, M. (2014). Crossing classroom boundaries through the use of collaboration supporting ICT: A case study on a school – kindergarten – library – senior home partnership. In H. Niemi, J. Multisilta, & E. Löfström (Eds.), Crossing boundaries for learning – Through technology and human efforts (pp. 67-90).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzywacki, H., Lavonen, J. M. J., & Juuti, K. (2013). There are no effective teachers in Finland – Only effective systems and professional teachers. In O-S. Tan, & W-C. Liu (Eds.), Teacher effectiveness. Singapore Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, A., & Miller, D. (2004). Teacher leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazza, J. (2013). The use of social media tools by school principals to communicate between home and school. Retrieved from http://dissexpress.umi.com/dxweb/doc/1436987219.html?FMT=AI&desc=The+use+of+social+media+tools+by+school+principals+to+communicate+between+home+and+school

    Google Scholar 

  • NCCBE. (2004). National core curriculum for basic education 2004. Helsinki: National Board of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Boston, MA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2004). Completing the foundation for lifelong learning: An OECD survey of upper secondary schools. Paris, France: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2006). Are students ready for a technology-rich world? What PISA studies tell us [No. 54931]. Paris, France: Programme for International Student Assessment.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from technology perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sormunen, K., Lavonen, J., & Juuti, K. (2014). Crossing classroom boundaries in science teaching and learning through the use of smartphones. In H. Niemi, J. Multisilta, & E. Löfström (Eds.), Crossing boundaries for learning – Through technology and human efforts (pp. 91-112).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st-century skills. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Korhonen, T., Lavonen, J., Kukkonen, M., Sormunen, K., Juuti, K. (2014). The Innovative School as an Environment for the Design of Educational Innovations. In: Niemi, H., Multisilta, J., Lipponen, L., Vivitsou, M. (eds) Finnish Innovations and Technologies in Schools. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-749-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics