The Power of Risk-Taking in Professional Learning

  • Ann-Christine Wennergren
Part of the Pedagogy, Education and Praxis book series (PEDA)

Abstract

The author of this chapter is engaged as a teacher and researcher at the University of Halmstad in Sweden, and has a special interest in professional learning based on action research. The chapter draws on experiences from a professional learning project conducted as a partnership between two municipalities and the University. The local authorities decided that two schools would participate in the project.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bambino, D. (2003). Critical friends: Redesigning professional development. Educational Leadership 59(6), 25-27.Google Scholar
  2. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education 24, 249-305.Google Scholar
  3. Costa, A. L., & Kallic, B. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership 51(2), 49–51.Google Scholar
  4. Cushman, K. (1998). How friends can be critical as schools make essential changes. Horace 14(5). Retrieved from www.essentialschools.org/resources/45
  5. Curry, M. (2008). Critical friends groups: the possibilities and limitations embedded in teacher professional communities aimed at instructional improvement and school reform. Teachers College Record 110(4), 733–774.Google Scholar
  6. Czarniawaska, B. (2007). Shadowing and other techniques for doing fieldwork in modern societies. Copenhagen: Liber.Google Scholar
  7. Dufore, R. (2004). What is a professional leaning community? Schools as learning communities. Educational Leadership 61(8), 6–11.Google Scholar
  8. Eilertsen, T.-V., & Jakhelln, R. (2014). The practical knowledge regime, teachers´ professionalism and professional development. In K. Rönnerman, & P. Salo (Eds.), Lost in Practice: Transforming Nordic Educational Action Research. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Elliot, J. (1993). What have we learned from action research in school-based evaluation? Educational Action Research 1(1), 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fullan, M. (2007). The meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers’ College, Colombia University.Google Scholar
  11. Furu, M. E. (2008). Teachers regaining their power: professional development through action learning. In K. Rönnerman, E. Furu, & P. Salo (Eds.), Nurturing praxis. Action research in partnership between school and university in a Nordic light (pp. 139–156). Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.Google Scholar
  12. Greenwood, D. J. & Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to Action Research. Social Research för Social Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Groundwater-Smith, S. & Mockler, N. (2009). Teacher professional Learning in an Age of Compliance. Mind the gap. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Handal, G. (1999a). Consultation Using Critical Friends. New direction for teaching and learning 79, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Handal, G. (1999b). Kritiske venner. Bruk av interkollegial kritik innen universiteten [Critical friends—the use of inter-collegial critique within universities]. Linköping LiTh, NyIng 9. Handal, G. (2006). Kritiske venner. In: H. Stømsø, K. H. Lycke, & P. Lauvås (Eds.), Når læring er det viktigste. Undervisning i høyere utdanning [ When learning is the most important. Teaching in higher education]. (pp. 233–250). Oslo: Cappelens Forlag AS.Google Scholar
  16. Handal, G., & Lauvås, P. (2000). På egna villkor. En strategi för handledning [On their own terms. A strategy for facilitation]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  17. Hansen, J. H. (2011). Narrativ dokumentation. En metod för utveckling av pedagogiskt arbete [Narrative documentation. A method for school development]. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
  18. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers. Changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. Toronto: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
  19. Hargreaves, A. (2002). Teaching and betrayal. Teaching and teaching: theory and practice 8(3–4), 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital. Transforming teaching in every school. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Jackson, D., & Street, H. (2005). Collaborative enquiry: why bother? In H. Street, & J. Tempeley (Eds.), Improving schools through collaborative enquiry (pp. 9–39). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  22. Key, E. (2006). Do they make a difference? A review of research on the impact of critical friends groups. Paper presented at the National School Reform Faculty Research Forum. Retrieved from http://www.nsrfharmony.org/research.key.pdf
  23. Langelotz, L., & Rönnerman, K. (2014). The practice of peer group mentoring—traces of global changes and regional traditions. In K. Rönnerman, & P. Salo (Eds.), Lost in Practice: Transforming Nordic Educational Action Research. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Loughran, J. (2006). Developing pedagogy of teacher education. Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Loughran, J. (2010). What expert teachers do? Enhancing professional knowledge for classroom practice. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Løvlie, L. (1974). Pedagogisk filosofi for praktiserande lærere. Synpunkter på pedagogikkstudiet i de pedagogiska högskoler. [Educational philosophy for practicing teachers. Opinions of studies in pedagogy in Higher Education] Pedagogen 1. Google Scholar
  27. McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. The Academy of Management Journal 38(1), 24–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McDonald, S. (2005). Studying actions in context: a qualitative shadowing method for organizational research. Qualitative Research 5(4), 455–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McLaughlin, C. (2000). Parallel processes in learning to learn: A school/university partnership focusing on developing the personal and social aspects of pedagogy. In M. Griffiths, & G. Impey (Eds.), Working partnerships: Better research and learning (pp. 77–79). Nottingham: Nottingham Trent University.Google Scholar
  30. Rönnerman, K., & Olin, A. (2014). Research circles - Constructing a space for elaborating on being a teacher leader in preschools. In K. Rönnerman, & P. Salo (Eds.). Lost in Practice: Transforming Nordic Educational Action Research. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities. A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change 7(4) 221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Swaffield, S. (2007). Light touch critical friendship. Improving Schools 10(3), 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Timperley, H. (2011). Realizing the power of professional learning. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wennergren, A. (2012). På spaning efter en kritisk vän [Searching for a critical friend]. In K. Rönnerman (Ed.), Aktionsforskning i praktiken. Förskola och skola på vetenskaplig grund. [Action research in practice. Preschool and school based on science]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  37. Wennergren, A., & Rönnerman, K. (2006). The relation between tools used in action research and the zone of proximal development. Educational Action Research 14(4), 547–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann-Christine Wennergren
    • 1
  1. 1.Teacher EducationUniversity of HalmstadSweden

Personalised recommendations