Advertisement

Communication in the Practicum

Fostering Relationships Between Universities and Schools
  • Josephine Ryan
  • Mellita Jones

Abstract

In the contemporary teacher education world many commentators see close relationships between schools and universities as critical to quality teacher education (House of Representatives, 2007; Parliament of Victoria, 2005; Zeichner, 2010). Schools and universities must work together, it is argued, because they must support the crucial site of professional learning, the practicum. The practicum, known by a range of other terms including professional experience, field experience, teaching placement, teaching round and internship, is the period of time that teacher education students, or pre-service teachers, develop their planning and teaching capabilities within the school context.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, J. (2011). Stakeholders’ perspectives of the nature and role of assessment during practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27 (4), 742–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartholomew, S., & Sandholtz, J. (2009). Competing views of teaching in a school-university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25 (1), 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Darling-Hammond, L. (Ed.) (2005). Professional development schools. Schools for developing a profession. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  4. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57 (3), 300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) . Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Grundy, S. (2007, April). Solving the practicum conundrum. iteach, Issue 01, 3. Retrieved fromGoogle Scholar
  7. House of Representatives (2007). Top of the class. Report on the inquiry into teacher education. [Electronic version]. Retrieved from http://www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/evt/teachereduc/report/front.pdf
  8. Kruger, T., Davies, A., Eckersley, B., Newell, F., & Cherednichenko, B. (2009). Effective and sustainable university-school partnerships. Beyond determined efforts of inspired individuals. Canberra: Teaching Australia. Electronic version http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/144200
  9. Loughran, J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Le Cornu, R. (2012). School co-ordinators: Leaders of learning in professional experience . Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 31 (3), 18–33.Google Scholar
  11. Lichtman, M. (2006). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Neal, D. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of the impact of a university-school partnership on their preservice practicum education. Unpublished thesis. La Trobe University, Bundoora. Retrieved from http://arrow.latrobe.edu.au:8080/vital/access/HandleResolver/1959.9/154671 Google Scholar
  13. Parliament of Victoria, Education and Training Committee. (2005). Step up, step in, step out. Report on the suitability of pre-service teacher training in Victoria. (Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer).Google Scholar
  14. Peters, J. (2011). Sustaining school colleagues’ commitments to a long-term professional experience partnership. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36 (5), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ramsey, G. (2000). Quality matters. Revitalising teaching: critical times, critical choices. Report of the review of teacher education, New South Wales. [Electronic version] Retrieved from https://www.det.nsw.edu.au/teachrev/reports/
  16. Richards, L. (2009). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide (2 nd ed.). London: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  17. Richards, L., & Morse, J. M. (2007). Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods (2nd ed.) . Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Robinson, S., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2005). Change for collaboration and collaboration for change: transforming teaching through school-university partnerships. In L.Darling-Hammond. Professional development schools. Schools for developing a profession (pp. 203–219). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ryan, J., Jones, M., & Walta, C. (2012). Creating a sustainable and supportive practicum for rural and regional areas. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 22 (1), 57–72.Google Scholar
  20. Shenton, A. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research. Education for Information, 22, 63–75.Google Scholar
  21. Ure, C. (2009). Practicum partnerships: exploring models of practicum organisation in teacher education for a standards-based profession. Parkville, Vic: University of Melbourne. Retrieved from http://www.altc.edu.au/project-practicum-partnerships-exploring-melbourne-2009 Google Scholar
  22. Zeichner, K. (2002). Beyond traditional structures of student teaching. Teacher Education Quarterly, Spring, 59–64.Google Scholar
  23. Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college-and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61 (1–2), 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josephine Ryan
    • 1
  • Mellita Jones
    • 2
  1. 1.Australian Catholic UniversityAustralia
  2. 2.Australian Catholic UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations