Advertisement

The Melbourne Graduate School of Education Master of Teaching

A Clinical Practice Model
  • Christine Redman

Abstract

This chapter explores a clinical practice model of teacher education at the University of Melbourne and the influences behind the decision to investigate and establish this new model of teacher education. It has been constructed in three key sections. Section one reviews the progressive changes in teacher education since the mid-1980s and Section two describes the theoretical conceptual thinking behind the restructuring of the Melbourne Graduate School of Education’s model for the Master of Teaching degree.

Keywords

Teacher Education Clinical Specialist Teacher Candidate Trainee Teacher Cognitive Apprenticeship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey&Company. Retrieved from http://mckinseyonsociety.com/how-the-worlds-bestperforming-schools-come-out-on-top/
  2. Benton, P. (1990). The Oxford internship scheme: Integration and partnership in initial teacher education, London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Brighouse, T. (2008). Putting professional development centre stage, Oxford Review of Education, 34 (3), 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carnegie Foundation. (2006). Teachers for a new era: Transforming teacher education. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York. Retrieved from http://carnegie.org/fileadmin/Media/Publications/PDF/Carnegie.pdf Google Scholar
  5. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 6 (11), 38–46.Google Scholar
  6. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8 (1), 1–44.Google Scholar
  7. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world, what teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. (2009). PoLT online professional learning resource. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/teachingprinciples/onlineresource/default.htm
  9. Dinham, S. (2006). Teaching and teacher education: Some observations, reflections and possible solutions. ED Ventures, 2, 3–20.Google Scholar
  10. Dinham, S. (2013). The quality teacher movement in Australia encounters difficult terrain: A personal perspective. The Australian Journal of Education, 57 (2), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flottman, R., McKernan, A., & Tayler, C. (2011). Victorian early years and development, evidence paper: Practice principle 2: Partnerships with professionals. Melbourne, Vic.: Department of Education and Early Childhood.Google Scholar
  12. Goodlad, J. L. (1990). Teachers for our nations schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Griffin, P., Murray, L. Care, E., Thomas, A., & Perri. P. (2010). Developmental assessment: Lifting literacy through professional learning teams, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(4), 383–397.Google Scholar
  14. Hattie, J. (2003, October). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented at ACER Research Conference. Melbourne.Google Scholar
  15. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Hayes, D., Mills, M., Christie, P., & Lingard, B. (2006). Teachers and schools making a difference, Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  17. Kriewaldt, J., & Turnidge, D. (2013). Conceptualising an approach to clinical reasoning in the education profession. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38 (6), 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levine, A. (2006). Educating school teachers. Washington DC: The Education Schools Project.Google Scholar
  19. McLean Davies, L., Anderson, M., Deans, J., Dinham, S., Griffin, P., Kameniar, B., Page, J., Reid, C., Rickards, F., Tayler, C., & Tyler, D. (2013). Masterly preparation: Embedding clinical practice in a graduate pre-service teacher education programme. Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy, 39 (1), 93–106.Google Scholar
  20. Marzano, R. J., & Toth, M. D. (2013). Teacher Evaluation that makes a difference: A new model for teacher growth and student achievement. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
  21. Phillips, D. (2008). Making a difference: Harry Judge, teacher education, the university, and the schools, Oxford Review of Education, 34 (3), 271–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pring, R. (2008). Teacher education at Oxford University: James is alive but living in Karachi, Oxford Review of Education, 34(3), 325–333 . CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reckwitz, A. (2012). Affective spaces: A praxeological outlook. Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice, 16 (2), 241–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Redman, C. (2013). Agentive roles, rights and duties in a technological era. In R. Harré, & F. Moghadamn (Eds.), The psychology of friendship and enmity: Relationships in love, work, politics, and war (pp. 109–128). Santa Barbra, CA: ABC-CLIO, LLC.Google Scholar
  25. Sanders, W., Wright, W., & Horn, S. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11 (1), 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schatzki, T. R. (2000). The social bearing of nature. Inquiry, 43 (1), 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sparling, J., Dragomir, C., Ramey, S., & Florescu, L. (2005). An educational intervention improves developmental progress of young children in a Romanian orphanage. Infant Mental Health Journal, 26 (2), 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. von Ueküll, J. (1982). The theory of meaning. Semiotica, 42 (1), 25–82. doi  10.1515/semi.1982.42.1.25 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine Redman
    • 1
  1. 1.Melbourne Graduate School of EducationThe University of MelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations