Abstract
We have presented an overview of the QR STEM project so STEM professional development leaders and teachers reading this have a sense of the big picture, including our goals, methods, and expected outcomes. We now turn to providing a detailed discussion of leading teachers in developing a performance task within the context of energy and environment using the Understanding by Design assessment framework (Wiggins and McTighe, 2005).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ausubel, J. H. (1996). Can technology spare the earth. American Scientist, 84, 166–178.
Becker, J. (2004). Making sustainable development evaluation work. Sustainable Development, 12, 200–211.
Butler, S. M., & McMunn, N. D. (2006). A teacher’s guide to classroom assessment: Understanding and using assessment to improve student learning. Indianapolis, IN: Jossey-Bass.
Chertow, M. R. (2001). The IPAT equation and its variants: Changing views of technology and environmental impact. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4, 13–29.
DePaolo, D. J., & Orr, F. M. (2008). Geoscience research for our energy future. Physics Today, 61, 46–51.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: Heath.
Ehrlich, P., & Holdren, J. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science, 171, 1212–1217.
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. (1997). Minds of our own. Annenberg Learner. http://learner.org/resources/series26.html
Hilbert, D. (1901). Problemes mathematiques.
National Research Council (NRC). (2001). Grand challenges in environmental sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2005). Creating a disaster resilient America: Grand challenges in science and technology: Summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Science Teachers Association. (1996). Pathways to science education standards. Arlington, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Omenn, G. S. (2006). Grand challenges and great opportunities in science, technology, and public policy. Science, 314, 1696–1704.
Rios-Velazquez, C., Robles-Suarez, R., Gonzalez-Negron, A. J., & Baez-Santos, I. (2006). The delta cooperative model: a dynamic and innovative team-work activity to develop research skills in microbiology. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 7, 20–27.
Schellnhuber, H.J., & Sahagian, D. (2002). The twenty-three GAIM questions. Global Change Newsletter, 49, 20–21.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on Mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York, NY: MacMillan.
Solomon, M. R. (1983). The role of products as social stimuli: A symbolic interactionism perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 319–329.
Steffen, W., Sanderson, A., Tyson, P. D., Jäger, J., Matson, P. A., Moore III, B., … Wasson, RJ. (2004). Global change and the earth system: A planet under pressure. New York: Springer.
Varmus, H., Klausner, R., Zerhouni, E., Acharya, T., Daar, A. S., & Singer, P. A. (2003). Grand Challenges in Global Health. Science, 302(5644), 398–399.
Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Ascd.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mayes, R., Myers, J. (2014). Energy and Environment Performance Task. In: Quantitative Reasoning in the Context of Energy and Environment. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-527-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-527-4_3
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-527-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)