Advertisement

Engagement and Educational Technologies

  • Noleine Fitzallen
  • Jillian Downing
Part of the Bold Visions in Educational Research book series (BVER)

Abstract

Engagement in the educational context is a fundamental principle that underpins the relationships and interactions among teachers, students, and resources. This simplistic stance belies the complexities of those relationships and the individual components. Each of the components has multiple characteristics and dimensions that add to the complex nature of learning and teaching, which may vary for different levels of schooling.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews, C., & Steel, C. H. (2011). Building university learners and teachers’ capacity to meet the challenges of blended learning in a transitioning society. Keynote address: The Sixth International Blended Learning Conference. UK: University of Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Higher education student statistics collection. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/1136.0Main+Features3052009
  3. Australian Council for Educational Research. (2011). Student engagement in New Zealand’s universities. AUSSE Report 2011. Accessed from http://www.acer.edu.au
  4. Betcher, C., & Lee, M. (2009). The interactive whiteboard revolution: Teaching with IWBs. Melbourne, VIC: ACER.Google Scholar
  5. Bolliger, D., & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance Education, 30(1), 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braxton, J. M., Hirschy, A. S., & McClendon, S. A. (2011). Understanding and reducing college student departure. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 30(3).Google Scholar
  7. Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dashper, L. (2005, October). Fostering engagement in Maori students. In proceedings of IT’s up here for thinking, Australian Computers in Education Conference. Cairns, QLD.Google Scholar
  9. Doherty, I., Steel, C., & Parrish, D. (2012). The challenges and opportunities for professional societies in higher education in Australasia: A PEST analysis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(1), 105–121.Google Scholar
  10. Downing, J. J., & Dyment, J. E. (2013). Teacher educators’ readiness, preparation and perceptions of preparing pre-service teachers in a fully online environment: An exploratory study. Teacher Educator, 48, 96–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. edX (2013). The future of online education. Retrieved from https://www.edx.org/about
  12. Faulk, N. (2010). Online teacher education: What are the results? Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 3(11), 21–28.Google Scholar
  13. Fish, W., & Gill, P. (2009). Perceptions of online instruction. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(1).Google Scholar
  14. Fitzallen, N. (2005). Integrating ICT into professional practice: A case study of four mathematics teachers. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce, & A. Roche (Eds.), Building Connections: Research, Theory and Practice (Proceedings of 28th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Melbourne, pp. 353–360). Sydney: MERGA.Google Scholar
  15. Fitzallen, N. (2012). Interpreting graphs: Students developing an understanding of covariation. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Mathematics education: Expanding horizons (Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Singapore, pp. 290–297). Sydney: MERGA.Google Scholar
  16. Fitzallen, N., & Brown, N. (2006, November). What profiling tells us about ICT and professional practice. In P. J. Jeffrey (Ed.), Creative Dissent: Constructive Solutions. Proceedings of the Australian Association for Research in Education 2005 International Education Research Conference, Parramatta.Google Scholar
  17. Fitzallen, N., Brown, N., Booth, S., & Howells, K. (2008, November). Transforming professional practice: What profiling tells us. In P. J. Jeffrey (Ed.), Research Impacts: Proving or Improving? Proceedings of the Australian Association for Research in Education 2007 International Education Research Conference, Fremantle.Google Scholar
  18. Gannon Cook, R., Ley, K., Crawford, C., & Warner, A. (2009). Motivators and inhibitors for University faculty in distance and e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garrison, R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung. T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gibbs, R., & Poskitt, J. (2010). Student engagement in the middle years of schooling (years 7–10): A literature review. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/74935/940_Student-Engagement-19052010.pdf
  21. Harvard Magazine. (2013, January/February). Classroom in the cloud. Retrieved from http://harvardmagazine.com/2012/11/classroom-in-the-cloud
  22. Herrington, J., Reeves, T., & Oliver, R. (2010). A guide to authentic e-learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2011). Collaborate to compete: Seizing the opportunity of online learning for UK higher education. Report to the Higher Education Funding Council for England by the Online Learning Task Force. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2011/201101/
  24. Hikmet, N., Taylor, E. Z., & Davis, C. J. (2008). The student productivity paradox: Technology mediated learning in schools. Communications of the ACM, 51(9), 128–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. IBSWorld. (2011). Online education in Australia: Market research report. Retrieved from http://www.ibisworld.com.au/industry/default.aspx?indid=1907
  26. Kahu, E. R. (2011). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, iFirst Article, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
  27. Kean, A. C., Embi, M. A., & Yunus, M. M. (2012). Incorporating ICT tools in an active strategy-based classroom to promote learning awareness and self-monitoring. International Education Studies, 5(4), 139–149.Google Scholar
  28. Krause, K. (2005). Understanding and promoting student engagement in university learning communties. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  29. Littlejohn, A., Margaryan, A., & Vojt, G. (2009). Exploring students use of ICT and expectations of learning methods. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 8(1), 13–20.Google Scholar
  30. Marcoux, B. (1999). Developing the national information literacy standards for student learning. Retrieved from http://atgstg01.sagepub.com/dvtlastudy/articles/Marcoux%20article.pdf
  31. Masters, J., & Donnison, S. (2010). First-year transition in teacher education: The Pod experience. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), Article 6. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol35/iss2/6/
  32. McQuiggan, C. (2007). The role of faculty development in online teaching’s potential to question teaching beliefs and assumptions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 10(3), Article 5.Google Scholar
  33. Mills, S., Yanes, M., & Casebeer, C. (2009). Perceptions of distance learning among faculty of a college of education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 19–28.Google Scholar
  34. Neal, G. (2006, November). Student reflections on the effectiveness of ICT as a learning resource. In P. J. Jeffrey (Ed.), Creative Dissent: Constructive Solutions. Proceedings of the Australian Association for Research in Education 2005 International Education Research Conference, Parramatta.Google Scholar
  35. Paulus, T., Myers, C., Mixer, S., Wyatt, T., Lee, D., & Lee, J. (2010). For faculty, by faculty: A case study of learning to teach online. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 7(1), Article 13.Google Scholar
  36. Phelps, R., Graham, A., & Thorton, P. (2006). Technology together: Getting whole schools involved with ICT through a metacognitive approach. Australian Education Leader, 28(1), 22–24.Google Scholar
  37. Pittaway, S. (2012). Student and staff engagement: Developing an Engagement Framework in a Faculty of Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reading, C. (2008, September–October). Recognising and measuring engagement in ICT-rich learning environments. In proceedings of ACT in IcT, the Australian Computers in Education 2008 Conference.Google Scholar
  39. Richardson, S. (2011). Uniting teachers and learners: Critical insights into the importance of staff-student interactions in Australian university education, AUSSE Research Briefing v.12 September 2011. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  40. Robina, K., & Anderson, M. (2010). Online teaching efficacy of nurse faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing, 168–175.Google Scholar
  41. Rovai, A., & Downey, J. (2010). Why some distance education programs fail while others succeed in a global environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Salmon, G. (2003). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  43. Shattock, M. (2010). Managing successful universities (2nd ed.). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Stack, S., Watson, J., & Abbot-Chapman, J. (2011). The challenges of creating connectivity for Tasmanian education. Hobart, TAS: Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania.Google Scholar
  45. University of Tasmania. (2013). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching (TELT) action plan V2.2. Hobart, TAS:Centre for the Advancement of Learning and Teaching, University of Tasmania.Google Scholar
  46. Ward Ulmer, L., Watson, L., & Derby, D. (2007). Perceptions of higher education faculty members on the value of distance education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(1), 59–89.Google Scholar
  47. Watson, C. (2007). Narratives of practice and the construction of identity in teaching. Teachers and Teaching, 12(5), 509–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhao, C-M., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noleine Fitzallen
  • Jillian Downing

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations