An Historical Exploration of Creativity Research

  • Robyn Mccarthy
  • Sharon Pittaway
Part of the Bold Visions in Educational Research book series (BVER)


Teacher understanding of the concept of creativity in relation to the educational context is vital to improved teaching and learning practices aimed at preparing effective thinkers, innovators and problem solvers of the future (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA], 2010).


Educational Context Creativity Research Divergent Thinking Historical Exploration Australian Curriculum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albert, R. S., & Runco, M. A. (1999). A history of research on creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 16–31). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2010). Draft shape of the Australian Curriculum: The Arts. Retrieved from
  3. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dacey, J. (1999). Concepts of creativity: A History. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzer (Ed.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1) (pp. 309–322). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Feldman, D. H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Gardner, H. (1994). Changing the world: A framework for the study of creativity. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  6. Finke, R. A., Ward, R. B., & Smith, S. M. (1996). Creative cognition: Theory, research and applications. Cambridge: Bradford Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Guilford, J. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaufman, J. C. (2009). Creativity 101. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Lubart, T. I. (1999). Creativity across cultures. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 339–350). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Michael, W. B. (1999). Guilford’s view. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Creativity (Vol. 1) (pp. 785–797). London, U.K.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ollerenshaw, J., & Creswell, J. (2002). Narrative research: A comparison of two restorying data analysis approaches. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(3), 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Plucker, J. (2007). Indiana University: J. P. Guilford. Retrieved from
  13. Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (2010). Creativity research. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds), The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Siedman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  16. Sternberg, R. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Taylor, C. W. (Ed.). (1964). Creativity: Progress and potential. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Wallas, G. (1926). Art of thought. London, UK: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  19. Weihua, N., & Sternberg, R. (2006). The philosophical roots of western and eastern conceptions of creativity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 26, 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robyn Mccarthy
  • Sharon Pittaway

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations