Advertisement

Policy and Curriculum Research in the Context of Change

  • Natalie Brown
  • Kim Beswick
Part of the Bold Visions in Educational Research book series (BVER)

Abstract

There is continual change in the education landscape in response to both public and political agendas. In the early 1990s, Simon Marginson noted that “the politics of education are changing and volatile, with little consensus on some issues” (1993, p. 3). This remains the case, with education policy highly politicised, and the results of this playing out in inevitable cycles for state-funded education systems, and other education stakeholders.

Keywords

Early Childhood Education Initial Teacher Education Australian Curriculum Curriculum Research Reporting Authority 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2002). An analysis of some unintended and negative consequences of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Research Unit, Education Policy Studies Laboratory, College of Education, Division of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
  2. Attanasio, O. (2012, May). Review of evidence and research gaps. Presentation given during panel 6. Early childhood education: Directions for future research, at Evidence-based education: Policy-making and reform in Africa. Accra, Ghana.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2012a). The shape of the Australian Curriculum, Version 3. Sydney: Author.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2012b). Using my school to support school and student improvement. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/Using_My_School_to_support_school_and_student_improvement.pdf
  5. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2012c). The Australian Curriculum: English, Version 4.0. Sydney: Author.Google Scholar
  6. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011a). Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia: Standards and procedures. Melbourne, VIC: Education Services Australia.Google Scholar
  7. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011b). National professional standards for teachers. Melbourne, VIC: Education Services Australia.Google Scholar
  8. Baker, R., Trotter, H., & Holt, J. (2003). Research report for Ministerial Council on Education, Employment and Youth Affairs. Sydney: Curriculum Corporation.Google Scholar
  9. Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian higher education: Final report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  10. Carvalho, C., & Solomon, Y. (2012). Supporting statistical literacy: What do culturally relevant/ realistic tasks show us about the nature of pupil engagement with statistics? International Journal of Educational Research, 55, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chung-Hoon, T. L., Hite, J. M., & Hite, S. J. (2005). Searching for enduring donor relationships: Evidence for factors and strategies in a donor/organization integration model for fund raising. International Journal of Educational Advancement, 6(1), 34–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Commonwealth of Australia. (2009). Transforming Australia’s higher education system. Canberra: Author.Google Scholar
  13. Considine, M., Marginson, S., Sheehan, P., & Kumnick, M. (2001). The comparative performance of Australia as a knowledge nation: Report to the Chifley Research Centre. Retrieved from http://vuir.vu.edu.au/15895/1/15895.pdf
  14. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers’ College Press.Google Scholar
  15. De Jong, O. (2004). Curriculum reform and new practices in classrooms and teacher courses. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 431–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Department of Education, Tasmania. (2002). Essential Learnings framework 1. Hobart: Author.Google Scholar
  17. Donnelly, K. (2007). Australia’s adoption of outcomes-based education: A critique. Issues in Educational Research, 17(2), 183–206.Google Scholar
  18. Edgar, D., & Edgar, P. (2008). The new child. In search of smarter grown-ups. Melbourne, VIC: Wilkinson Publishing Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. Harris, C., & Marsh, C. J. (2005). Curriculum developments in Australia: Promising initiatives, impasses and dead-ends. New York: Open Book Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Hursh, D. (2008). High-stakes testing and the decline of teaching and learning. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  21. Johnstone, D. B. (2004). A political culture of giving and the philanthropic support of higher education in international perspective. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  22. Le Métias, J. (2003). International trends in curriculum frameworks. The Educational Forum, 67(3), 235–247Google Scholar
  23. Lingard, B. (2010). Policy borrowing, policy learning: Testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luke, A. ( 2010). Documenting reproduction and inequality: Revisiting Jean Anyon’s ‘social class and school knowledge’. Curriculum Inquiry, 40(1), 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Luke, A., Freebody, P., Shun, S., & Gopinathan, S. (2005). Towards research-based innovation and reform: Singapore schooling in transition. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 25(1), 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luke, A., Matters, G., Herschell, P., Grace, N., Barratt, R., & Land, R. (2000). Draft New Basics Project Technical Paper, Version 3 April 2000. Brisbane, QLD: Education Queensland.Google Scholar
  27. Marginson, S. (1993). Education and public policy in Australia. Melbourne, VIC: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marginson, S., & Van der Wende, M. (2007). To rank or to be ranked: The impact of global rankings in higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 306–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morgan-Klein, B., & Osborne, M. (2007). The concepts and practices of lifelong learning. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Mulford, B. (2007). Quality Australian evidence on leadership for improved learningThe leadership challenge – Improving learning in schools. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference_2007/8
  31. Mulford, B., & Edmunds, B. (2010). Educational measurement in Australian schooling: Serving public purposes in Tasmanian primary schools. Launceston, TAS: Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania.Google Scholar
  32. National Scientific Council on the Developing Child (2008). The timing and quality of early experiences combine to shape brain architecture (Working paper #5). Cambridge, MA: Centre on the Developing Child, Harvard University. Retrieved from http://www.developingchild.net/pubs/wp/Timing_Quality_Early_Experiences.pdf
  33. Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2005). The inevitable corruption of indicators and educators through high-stakes testing. Tempe, AZ: Education Policy Studies Laboratory, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
  34. Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2008). Why has high-stakes testing so easily slipped into contemporary American life? Phi Delta Kappan, 672–676.Google Scholar
  35. Press, F. (2008). Trends and debates in ECEC policy: A literature review canvassing policy developments in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Sweden and the United Kingdom. In D. Brennan (Ed.). Building an international research collaboration in early childhood education and care. Background Materials for a Workshop funded by the Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth (ARACY), February 18–19th, Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
  36. Rodwell, G. (2011). One newspaper’s role in the demise of the Tasmanian Essential Learnings curriculum: Adding new understandings to Cohen’s moral panic theory in analysing curriculum change. Journal of Educational Change, 12, 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (Eds.). (2000). From neurons to neighbourhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  38. Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2004). The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  39. Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Thomson, S., Hillman, K., Wernert, N., Schmid, M., Buckley, S., & Munene, A. (2012). Highlights from TIMSS & PIRLS 2011 from Australia’s perspective. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  41. Tight, M. (2003). Researching Higher Education. Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Townsend, T., & Bates, R. (2007). Handbook of teacher education: Globalization, standards and professionalism in times of change. Springer: Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Watson, J., Beswick, K., & Brown, N. (2012). Educational research and professional learning in changing times. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wigglesworth, G., Simpson, J., & Loakes, D. (2011). NAPLAN language assessments for indigenous children in remote communities: Issues and problems. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 320–343.Google Scholar
  45. Wyn, J. (2006). Youth transitions to work and further education in Australia. In J. Chapman, P. Cartwright, & E. J. McGilp (Eds.). Lifelong learning, participation and equity (pp. 217–242). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalie Brown
  • Kim Beswick

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations