Skip to main content

Principals’ Voices Via Modelling?

Issues of Voice in Quantitative Studies and the Use of Complexity Theory

  • Chapter
Echoes
  • 722 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the use of complexity theory as a lens to enable issues of voice to be considered in studies utilising quantitative methods. The voices of participants in education research are most often heard through qualitative research studies. The approach taken in this study was to listen to the voices of government school principals through qualitative interviews and to amplify their voices through a quantitative approach and the use of complexity theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, K. J., & Minke, K. M. (2007). Parent involvement in education: Toward an understanding of parents’ decision making. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrich, D., Sheridan, B., & Luo, G. (2005). Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model (RUMM2020). Perth, WA, Australia: RUMM Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrich, D., & Styles, I. (1994). The structural relationship between attitude and behaviour statements from the unfolding perspective. Paper presented at the 23rd International Congress of Applied Psychology, Madrid, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apache Software Foundation (2003). SPSS version 12. Cupertino, CA: Apple.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boal, K. B., & Schultz, P. L. (2007). Storytelling, time and evolution: The role of strategic leadership in complex adaptive systems. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, A., Stallybrass, O., & Trombley, S. (Eds.). (1988). The Fontana dictionary of modern thought (2nd ed.). London, UK: Harper-Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, R. F., & Dellar, G. B. (2003). Organisational and learning community conceptions of schools: Implications for understanding researching school improvement. In R. F. Waugh (Ed.), On the forefront of educational psychology. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (1997). Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations and environment: Retrospect and prospect. Organization Studies, 18(1), 43–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (2001). PLS Graph User’s Guide 3.0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniello, F. (2010). Complexity theory as a lens for conceptualizing change in the delivery of professional development. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Denver, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Training. (2003). Plan for government schools 2004–2007 Perth, WA: Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Training. (2004). Regulatory framework CD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eacott, S. (2009). New look leaders or a new look at leadership. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education after annual conference, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell-Mann, M. (1994). The quark and the jaguar: Adventures in the simple and the complex. London, UK: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gharajedaghi, J. (1999). Systems thinking: Managing chaos and complexity. Boston, MA: Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilstrap, D. (2005). Leadership and strange attractors. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual conference, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1999). Can leadership enhance school effectiveness? In T. Bush, D. E. Bell, R. Bolam, R. Glatter, & P. Ribbins (Eds.), Educational management: Redefining theory, policy and practice. London, UK: Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order: How adaption builds complexity. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (2000). Emergence from chaos to order. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2005). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice (7th ed.). New York, UK: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J., & Weiss, I. (2007). Towards an integration of intuitive and systematic decision making in education. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(3), 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, J. K.-H. (2001). From state control to governance: Decentralization and higher education in Guangdong, China. International Review of Education, 47(1/2), 123–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagashima, H., & Baba, Y. (1999). Introduction to chaos: Physics and mathematics of chaotic phenomena translated by M. Nakahara. Bristol, UK: Institute of Physics Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, D. (2003). The dance and the music. Perth, WA, Australia: Graduate School of Business. Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, R. N., & Hunt, J. G. (2007). Leadership and the choice of order: Complexity and hierarchical perspectives near the edge of chaos. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plowman, D. A., Solansky, S., Beck, T. E., Baker, L., Kulkarni, M., & Travis, D. V. (2007). The role of leadership in emergent self-organization. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 341–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, R., & Bright, J. (2011). The chaos theory of careers. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, T., Angus, L., & Poole, M. E. (1990). Pressures on the move to school-based decision-making and management. In J. Chapman (Ed.), School-based decision-making and management. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silcox, S. B. (2003). An investigation of the roles of school principals in leading school renewal in a Western Australian school district. Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy dissertation, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, WA, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H A. (1957). Models of man. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (1996). Strategic management and organisational dynamics (2nd ed.). London, UK: Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, K. (2008). Whose risk? Managing risk in the principalship. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education annual conference, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. London, UK: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimmer, K. (2003a). Review of the regulatory framework Perth, WA, Australia: Education Department of Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimmer, K. (2003b). Review of the West Australian Department of Education regulatory framework. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education annual conference, Auckland, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimmer, K. (2011). Non-compliance by school principals: The effects of experience, stakeholder characteristics and governance mechanisms on reasoned risk-taking in decision-making. Unpublished Doctor of Business Administration dissertation, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, WA, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 298–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, M. M. (1993). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. St Ives, UK: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western Australian Legislation. (1999). School Education Act 1999. Perth, WA, Australia: Parliament of Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, A. (2003). A dialogue on human resource strategy and turbulence: The use of chaos and quantum metaphors. Perth, WA, Australia: Graduate School of Business, Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, A. (2004). Enlightenment the age of reason. Perth, WA, Australia: Graduate School of Business, Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trimmer, K. (2014). Principals’ Voices Via Modelling?. In: Midgley, W., Davies, A., Oliver, M.E., Danaher, P.A. (eds) Echoes. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-491-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics