Psychometrics

Adams, R. J., Wilson, M., & Wang, W. (1997). The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, R. J., Wilson, M., & Wu, M. (1997). Multilevel item response models: An approach to errors in variables regression. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22(1), 47–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), and National Council for Measurement in Education (NCME). (1999). Standards for psychological and educational tests. Washington D.C.: AERA, APA, and NCME.Google Scholar

Baker, F. B., & Kim, S.-H. (2004). Item response theory: Parameter estimation techniques (2nd ed.). New York: Dekker.Google Scholar

Banta, T. W., Lund, J. P., Black, K. E., & Oblander, F. W. (1996). Assessment in practice: PuttingGoogle Scholar

principles to work on college campuses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Baxter, J. (1995). Children’s understanding of astronomy and the earth sciences. In S. M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice (pp. 155–177). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Black, P., Wilson, M., & Yao, S. (2011). Road maps for learning: A guide to the navigation of learning progressions. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 9, 1–52.Google Scholar

Bradlow, E. T., Wainer, H., & Wang, X. (1999). A Bayesian random effects model for testlets. Psychometrika, 64, 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brennan, R. L. (2006). Perspectives on the evolution and future of educational measurement. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed.).Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Briggs, D., Alonzo, A., Schwab, C., & Wilson, M. (2006). Diagnostic assessment with ordered multiplechoice items. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, W. (1910). Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 296–322.Google Scholar

Campbell, N. R. (1928). An account of the principles of measurement and calculation. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar

Claesgens, J., Scalise, K., Wilson, M., & Stacy, A. (2009). Mapping student understanding in chemistry: The perspectives of chemists. Science Education, 93(1), 56–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooke, L. (2006). Is the mouse a poor man’s eye tracker? Proceedings of the Society for Technical Communication Conference. Arlington, VA: STC, 252–255.Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral mea surements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Dahlgren, L. O. (1984a). Outcomes of learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar

De Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

De Boeck, P., & Wilson, M. (Eds.). (2004). Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Draney, K., & Wilson, M. (2009). Selecting cut scores with a composite of item types: The Construct Mapping procedure. In E. V. Smith, & G. E. Stone (Eds.), Criterion-referenced testing: Practice analysis to score reporting using Rasch measurement (pp. 276–293). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.Google Scholar

Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.Google Scholar

Everitt, B. S. (2010). Cambridge dictionary of statistics (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. AMS Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guttman, L. (1944). A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review, 9, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guttman, L. A. (1950). The basis for scalogram analysis. In S. A. Stouffer, L. A. Guttman, F. A. Suchman, P. F. Lazarsfeld, S. A. Star, & J. A. Clausen (Eds.), Studies in social psychology in world war two, vol. 4. Measurement and prediction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Holland, P. W., & Hoskens, M. (2003). Classical test theory as a first-order item response theory: Application to true-score prediction from a possibly-nonparallel test. Psychometrika, 68, 123–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ivie, J. L., Embretson, S., E. (2010). Cognitive process modeling of spatial ability: The assembling objects task. Intelligence, 38(3), 324–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janssen, R., Schepers, J., & Peres, D. (2004). Models with item and item-group predictors. In, P. De Boeck, & M. Wilson, (Eds.), Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Kakkonen, T., Myller, N., Sutinen, E., & Timonen, J. (2008). Comparison of dimension reduction methods for automated essay grading. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 275–288.Google Scholar

Kane, M. T. (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed.).Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Kofsky, E. (1966). A scalogram study of classificatory development. Child Development, 37, 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2, 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 52.Google Scholar

Longford, N. T., Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T.(1993). Stability of the MH D-DIF statistics across populations. In P. W. Holland, & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Luce, R. D., & Tukey, J. W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2002). A nontechnical introduction to latent class models. Statistical innovations white paper No. 1. Available at: www.statisticalinnovations.com/articles/articles.html.Google Scholar

Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography: Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masters, G. N., Adams, R. J., & Wilson, M. (1990). Charting of student progress. In T. Husen & T. N.Google Scholar

Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education: Research and studies. Supplementary, Volume 2 (pp. 628–634). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.Google Scholar

Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Education Researcher, 32(2), 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meulders, M., & Xie, Y. (2004). Person-by-item predictors. In, P. De Boeck, & M. Wilson, (Eds.), Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Michell, J. (1990). An introduction to the logic of psychological measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Mislevy, R, J., Wilson, M., Ercikan, K., & Chudowsky, N. (2003). Psychometric principles in student assessment. In T. Kellaghan, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment (Committee on the Foundations of Assessment. J. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky, & R. Glaser, (Eds.), Division on behavioural and social sciences and education). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

National Research Council. (2008). Early childhood assessment: Why, what, and how? Committee on Developmental Outcomes and Assessments for Young Children, Catherine E. Snow & Susan B. Van Hemel, (Eds.), Board on children, youth and families, board on testing and assessment, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. J., Elder, J., & Miner, G. D. (2009). Handbook of statistical analysis and data mining applications. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Nunnally, C. J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Paek, I. (2002). Investigation of differential item functioning: Comparisons among approaches, and extension to a multidimensional context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Ramsden, P., Masters, G., Stephanou, A., Walsh, E., Martin, E., Laurillard, D., & Marton, F. (1993). Phenomenographic research and the measurement of understanding: An investigation of students’ conceptions of speed, distance, and time. International Journal of Educational Research, 19(3), 301–316.Google Scholar

Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danmarks Paedogogische Institut.Google Scholar

Saal, F. E., Downey, R. G., & Lahey, M. A. (1980). Rating the Ratings: Assessing the Psychometric Quality of Rating Data. Psychological Bulletin. 88(2), 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scalise, K., & Wilson, M. (2011). The nature of assessment systems to support effective use of evidence through technology. E-Learning and Digital Media, 8(2), 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized latent variable modeling: Multilevel, longitudinal and structural equation models. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shavelson, R. J., Webb, N. M., & Rowley, G. L. (1989). Generalizability theory. American Psychologist, 44, 922–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spearman, C. C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spearman, C, C. (1910). Correlation calculated from faulty data. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 271–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Takane, Y. (2007). Applications of multidimensional scaling in psychometrics. In C. R. Rao, & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics, Vol. 26: Psychometrics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Thorburn, W. M. (1918). The myth of occam’s Razor. Mind, 27(107), 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van der Linden, W. (1992). Fundamental measurement and the fundamentals of Rasch measurement. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Objective measurement: Theory into practice Vol. 2. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.Google Scholar

van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (Eds.) (1997). Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18, 123–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wang, W.-C., & Wilson, M. (2005). The Rasch testlet model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29,126–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press,Google Scholar

Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Wilson, M. (2009). Measuring progressions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 716–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, M., & Adams, R. J. (1995). Rasch models for item bundles. Psychometrika, 60(2), 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, M., & Draney, K. (2002). A technique for setting standards and maintaining them over time. In S. Nishisato, Y. Baba, H. Bozdogan, & K. Kanefugi (Eds.), Measurement and multivariate analysis (Proceedings of the International Conference on Measurement and Multivariate Analysis, Banff, Canada, May 12–14, 2000), pp. 325–332. Tokyo: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Wright, B. D. (1968). Sample-free test calibration and person measurement. Proceedings of the 1967 invitational conference on testing (pp. 85–101). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar

Wright, B. D. (1977). Solving measurement problems with the Rasch model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press.Google Scholar