Abstract
What constitutes ‘good’ teaching and ‘good’ learning is a complex and controversial issue. Educational agencies in New Zealand, like those in other western countries, have called for synthesis of research evidence (see Anthony & Walshaw, 2007; Stanley, 2008; Ingvarson, Beavis, Bishop, Peck, & Elsworth, 2004; National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008; Sullivan, 2011) to inform policy and professional development initiatives aimed at improving the quality of teaching and learning outcomes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2007). Effective pedagogy in mathematics/pāngarau: Best evidence synthesis iteration [BES]. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
Attard, C. (2011). The influence of teachers on student engagement with mathematics during the middle years. In J. Clark, B. Kissane, J. Mousley, T. Spencer, & S. Thornton (Eds.), Mathematics: Traditions and [new] practices (Vol. 1, pp. 68–74). Alice Springs: AAMT-MERGA.
Balatti, J., & Rigano, D. (2011). Preservice teacher perceptions of good mathematics teachers: What matters? In J. Clark, B. Kissane, J. Mousley, T. Spencer, & S. Thornton (Eds.), Mathematics: Traditions and [new] practices (Vol. 1, pp. 82–88). Alice Springs: AAMT-MERGA.
Bishop, R., Berryman, M., Cavanagh, T., & Teddy, L. (2009). Te kotahitanga: Addressing educational disparities facing Māori students in New Zealand. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 734–742.
Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside school. Teachers College Record, 110(3), 608–645.
Boston, M., & Smith, M. S. (2009). Transforming secondary mathematics teaching: Increasing the cognitive demands of instructional tasks used in teachers' classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(2), 119–156.
Caygill, R., & Kirkham, S. (2008). Mathematics: Trends in Year 5 mathematics achievement 1994 to 2006. Wellington: Ministry of Education
Clarke, D. (2012). Contingent conceptions of accomplished practice: the cultural specificity of discourse in and about the mathematics classroom. ZDM – International Journal on Mathematics Education, 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s11858-012-0452-8.
Clarke, D. J., Emanuelsson, J., Jablonka, E., & Mok, I. A. C. (2006). The Learner's Perspective Study and international comparisons of classroom practice. In D. J. Clarke, J. Emanuelsson, E. Jablonka, & I. A. C. Mok (Eds.), Making connections: Comparing mathematics classrooms around the world (pp. 1–22). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Cobb, P., & Hodge, L. (2007). Culture, identity, and equity in the mathematics classroom. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 159–172). New York: Teachers College Press.
Cobb, P., & Hodge, L. (2011). Culture, identity, and equity in the mathematics classroom. In E. Yackel, K. Gravemeijer, & A. Sfard (Eds.), A journey in mathematics education research (pp. 179–195). Dordrecht: Springer.
Cobb, P., Gresalfi, M., & Hodge, L. L. (2009). An interpretive scheme for analyzing the identities that students develop in mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(1), 40–68.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creating in practice. In Y. Engeström, M. Miettinen & R. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 371–404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gresalfi, M., Martin, T., Hand, V., & Greeno, J. (2009). Constructing competence: an analysis of student participation in the activity systems of mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(1), 49–70.
Grootenboer, P., & Zevenbergen, R. (2008). Identity as a lens to understand learning mathematics: Developing a model. In M. Goos, R. Brown, & K. Maker (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 243–249). Brisbane: MERGA.
Hunter, R., & Anthony, G. (2011). Forging mathematical relationships in inquiry-based classrooms with Pasifika students. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 4(1), 98–119.
Ingvarson, L., Beavis, A., Bishop, A., Peck, R., & Elsworth, G. (2004). Investigation of effective mathematics teaching and learning in Australian secondary schools. Canberra: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Kane, R., & Maw, N. (2005). Making sense of learning at secondary school: involving students to improve teaching practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(3), 311–322.
Kaur, B. (2009). Characteristics of good mathematics teaching in Singapore grade 8 classrooms: A juxtaposition of teachers’ practice and students’ perception, ZDM – International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 333–347.
Kazemi, E., Franke, M., & Lampert, M. (2009). Developing pedagogies in teacher education to support novice teachers’ ability to enact ambitious instruction. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research group of Australasia (pp. 11–29). Wellington: MERGA.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ministry of Education (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world: PISA summary report. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Perry, B. (2007). Australian teachers' views of effective mathematics teaching and learning. ZDM-International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39, 271–286.
Sfard, A. (2005). What could be more practical than good research? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 393–413.
Stanley, G. (Chair of Human Capital Working Group). (2008). National numeracy review report. Council of Australian Governments.
Sullivan, P. (2011). Teaching mathematics: Using research-informed strategies (No. 59, Australian Educational Review). Camberwell, VC: ACER Press.
Sullivan, P., Tobias, S., & McDonough, A. (2006). Perhaps the decision of some students not to engage in learning mathematics in school is deliberate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 81–99.
Thornton, S. (2006). Moving into third space-High school students' funds of knowledge in the mathematics classroom. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen, & M. Chinnappan (Eds.), Identities cultures and learning spaces: Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 504–511). Adelaide: MERGA.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Walshaw, M. (2011). Identity as the cornerstone of quality and equitable mathematical experiences. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 91–104). Dordrecht: Springer.
Walshaw, M., Ding, L., & Anthony, G. (2009). Enhancing mathematical identities at the expense of mathematical proficiency? Lessons from a New Zealand classroom. In M. Tzaekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, pp. 313–320). Thessaloniki: PME.
Wilson, P., Cooney, T., & Stinson, D. (2005). What constitutes good mathematics teaching and how it develops: nine high school teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 83–111.
Xu, L., & Clarke, D. (2012). Meta-rules of discursive practice in mathematics classrooms from Seoul, Shanghai, and Tokyo. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(6). doi: 10.1007/s11858-012-0442-x.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anthony, G. (2013). Student Perceptions of the ‘Good’ Teacher and ‘Good’ Learner in New Zealand Classrooms. In: Kaur, B., Anthony, G., Ohtani, M., Clarke, D. (eds) Student Voice in Mathematics Classrooms around the World. Learner’s Perspective Study. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-350-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-350-8_12
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-350-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)