Skip to main content

Anti-Colonial Subaltern Social Movement (SSM) Learning and Development Dispossession in India

  • Chapter
Learning with Adults

Part of the book series: International Issues in Adult Education ((ADUL))

Abstract

This chapter considers the significance of a selective reading of subaltern studies for informing and understanding SSM political formations and anti-colonial SSM pedago gies of place (Kapoor, 2009a) in contexts of development-displacement and disposses sion of Adivasis and Dalits in the state of Orissa, India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arnold, D. (1984). ‘Gramsci and peasant subalternity in India’, Journal of of Peasant Studies, 11(4), 155–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asian Center for Human Rights. (2005). ‘Promising picture or broken future? Commentary and recommendations on the draft national policy on Tribals of the Government of India’. Retrieved May 29, 2011, from www.achrweb.org

  • Banerjee, P. (2006). ‘West Bengal: land acquisition and peasant resistance in Singur.’ Economic and Political Weekly (Kolkata) (pp. 4718–4720), 18 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, R., Gray, A & Kingsbury, B. (Eds.) (1995). Indigenous peoples of Asia. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barua, B. (2009). ‘Colonial education and non-violent activism of rural Buddhist communities in Bangladesh’, in D. Kapoor (Ed.). Education, decolonization and development: Perspectives from Asia, Africa and the Americas (pp. 57–74). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behura, N. & Panigrahi, N. (2006). Tribals and the Indian constitution: Functioning of the fifth schedule in Orissa. New Delhi, India: Rawat Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevington, D., & Dixon, C. (2005). Movement-relevant theory: Rethinking Social Movement scholarship and activism. Social Movement Studies, 4(3), 185–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bidwai, P. (2007). Left faces critical choices. Combat Law, 6(3), 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biel, R. (2000). The new imperialism: Crisis and contradictions in North/South relations. London and New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boron, A. (2005). Empire and imperialism: A critical reading of michael hardt and antonio negri. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, T. (2001). ‘Moral economists, subalterns. New social movements and the (re-) emergence of a (post) modernized (middle) peasant. V. Chaturvedi (Ed.). Mapping Subaltern Studies and the Postcolonial (pp. 127–162). New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, T. (2007). A world which is not yet: peasants, civil society and the state. Journal of Peasant Studies, 34(3–4), 582–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A., & Palan, R. (2004). The imagined economies of globalization. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, P. (1983). More on modes of power and the peasantry. Subaltern Studies, 2(3), 311–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, P. (2001). ‘On civil and political society in post-colonial democracies. In S. Kaviraj & S. Khilnani (Eds.), Civil Society: History and Possibilities (pp. 165–178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Human Rights and Global Justice (CHRGJ) (2011). Every thirty minutes: Farmer suicides, human rights, and the agrarian crises in India. New York: NYU School of Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudry, A., & Kapoor, D. (2010). Learning from the ground up: Global perspectives on social movements and knowledge production. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudry, A. (2009). Learning in social action: Knowledge production in social movements. McGill Journal of Education, 44(1), 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudry, A. (2010). Global justice? Contesting NGOization: Knowledge politics and containment in anti-globalization networks. In A. Choudry & D. Kapoor (Eds.), Learning from the Ground Up: Global Perspectives on Social Movements and Knowledge Production (pp. 17–34). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. (1992). Ethnography and the Historical Imagination. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2007). Southern Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Costa, D. (2009). Development dramas: Reimagining rural political action in eastern India. New Delhi: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, R. (2007). Introduction: Peasant, state and class. Journal of Peasant Studies, 34(3–4), 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirlik, A. (1994). The postcolonial era: Third world criticism in the age of global capitalism. Critical Inquiry, 20(2), 328–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, W. (2006). Development-related displacement and tribal women. In G. Rath, (Ed.). Tribal Development in India: The Contemporary Debate (pp. 112–132). New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, J. (2010). An overview of resistance against industrial tree plantations in the global south. Economic and Political Weekly, XLV (4l), 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, K. (2006). Between global flows and local dams: Indigenousness, locality and the transnational sphere in Jharkhand, India, Cultural Anthropology, 21(4), 501–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, K. (2010). Indigenous incitements. In D. Kapoor and E. Shizha (Eds.), Indigenous knowledge and learning in Asia/Pacific and Africa: Perspectives on development, education and culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grande, S. (2004). Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha, R. (1982). ‘On some aspects of the historiography of colonial India.’ In R. Guha, (Ed.). Subaltern Studies I (pp. 1–8). Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha, R. (1985). Elementary aspects of peasant insurgency in colonial India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha, R. (1997). Dominance without hegemony: History and power in colonial India. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha, R. (2000). ‘On some aspects of the historiography of colonial India’. In V. Chaturvedi, (Ed.). Mapping the subaltern studies and the postcolonial (pp. 1–7). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha, R. (2001). ‘Subaltern studies: Projects for our time and their convergence’. In I. Rodriguez, (Ed.). The latin American subaltern studies reader (pp. 35–46). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1980). Race, articulation and societies structured in dominance. In Sociological theories, race and colonialism (pp. 303–345). Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holst, J. (2002). Social movements, civil society and radical adult education. Westport, Connecticut: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesson, B. (1999). Only their purpose is mad. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamat, S. (2002). Development hegemony: NGOs and the state in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamat, S. (2004). The privatization of public interest: Theorizing NGO discourse in a neoliberal Era. Review of International Political Economy, 11(1) 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (2005). NGO partnerships and the taming of the grassroots in rural India. Development in Practice, 15(2), 210–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (2007). Subaltern social movement learning and the decolonization of space in India. International Education, 37(1), 10–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (2009a). ‘Globalization, dispossession, and subaltern social movement (SSM) learning in the South’. In A. Abdi, & D. Kapoor (Eds.), Global perspectives on adult education (pp. 71–92). NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (2009b). ‘Adivasis “in the way” of state-corporate development: Development dispossession and learning in social action for land and forests in India’. McGill Journal of Education, 44 (1), 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (2009c). Participatory academic research (par) and people’s Participatory Action Research (PAR): Research, politicization, and subaltern social movements in India. In D. Kapoor, D & S. Jordan (Eds.), Education, participatory action research and social change (pp. 29–44). NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (2010). ‘Learning from adivasi (original dweller) political-ecologieal expositions of development: Claims on forests, land and place in India. In D. Kapoor & E. Shizha (Eds.), Indigenous knowledge and learning in Asia/Pacific and Africa: Perspectives on development, education and culture (pp. 17–34). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (2011). ‘Subaltern Social Movement (SSM) post-mortems of development in India: Locating trans-local activism and radicalism’, Journal of Asian and African Studies, 46(2), 130–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (2013a). Colonial continuities, Neoliberal hegemony and adivasi (original dweller) space: Human rights as paradox and equivocation in contexts of dispossession in India. In S. Bagchi & A. Das (Eds.) Towards a Third World Discourse on Human Rights (pp. 123–144), NYC: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (2013b). NGOs, compulsory industrialization and social action in the rural periphery: Explorations in to the uncivility of civil society in India. In A. Choudry & D. Kapoor (Eds.), NGOization: Complicity, contradiction and prospects (pp. 46–74). London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwaipun, V. (2009). Popular education and organize d response to gold mining in Ghana. In A. Abdi & D. Kapoor (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Adult Education (pp. 175–192). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, J. (2011). Social Movement learning in Ghana: communal defense of resources in neoliberal times. In D. Kapoor (Ed.). Critical Perspectives on Neoliberal Globalization, Development and Education in Africa and Asia (pp. 153–170) Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ludden, D. (2003). (Ed.) Reading Subaltern Studies: Critical History, Contested Meaning arid the Globalization of South Asia. New Delhi, India: Pauls Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, P. (1999). Gramsci, freiré and adult education: Possibilities for transformative action. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, P. (2010). (Ed.). Gramsci and educational thought. Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, G. (2010). Recoveries of space and subjectivity in the shadow of violence: The clandestine politics of pavement dwellers in Mumbai. In P. McMichael (Ed.). Contesting development: Critical struggles for social change (pp. 151–164). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, A., & Nigam, A. (2007). Power and contestation: India Since 1989. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, W. (2000). Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mookerjea, M (2010). Autonomy and video mediation: Dalitbahujan women’s Utopian knowledge production. In D. Kapoor and E. Shizha (Eds.), Indigenous knowledge and learning in Asia/ Pacific and Africa: Perspectives on development, Education and cCulture.(pp.) New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mookerjea, S. (2011). On learning how to liberate the common: Subaltern biopolitics and the endgame of Neoliberalism. In D. Kapoor (Ed.). Critical perspectives on neoliberal globalization, development and education in Africa and Asia(pp..??). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeraj, J. (2007). Globalization or Re-colonization. Pune, India: Lokayat Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padel, F. & Das, S. (2010). Out of this earth: East India adivasis and the aluminium cartel New Delhi, India: Orient Blackswan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peine, E. (2010). Corporate mobilization on the soyabean frontier of mato grosso, Brazil. In P. McMichael (Ed.). Contesting development: critical struggles for social change. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petras, J., & Veltmeyer, H. (2001). Globalization umasked: Imperialism in the 21st Century. New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimple, M., & Sethi, M. (2005). Occupation of land in India. In S. Moyo and P. Years (Eds.) Reclaiming the Land: The resurgence of rural movements in Africa, Asia and Latin America (pp. 235–256). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasant, K., & Kapoor, D. (2010). Learning and knowledge production in Dalit Social Movements in rural India. In A. Choudry & D. Kapoor (Eds.) Learning from the ground up: Global perspectives on social movements and knowledge production (pp. 193–210). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power and eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology, 15(2), 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rath, G. (Ed.) (2006). Tribal development in India: The contemporary debate. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal, B. (2003). International law from below: Development, social movements and third world resistance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal, K. (2010). Rethinking capitalist development: Primitive accumulation, governmentality and postcolonial capitalism. New Delhi: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S. (2003). The decline of the subaltern in subaltern studies. In D. Ludden (Ed.) Reading subalternsStudies: Critical history, contested meaning and the globalization of South Asia (pp.). New Delhi: Pauls Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayeed, A., & Haider, W. (2010). Anjuman-e-Mazareen Punjab: Ownership or death—the struggle continues. In A. Choudry & D. Kapoor (Eds.), Learning from the ground up: Global perspectives on social movements and knowledge production (pp.211–226). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, R. (2011). The politics of postcolonialism: Empire, nation and resistance. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, A. (2010). In the shadows of the state: Indigenous politics, environmentalism, and insurgency infharkhand, India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sivaramakrishnan, K. (2005). Situating the subaltern: History and anthropology in the subaltern studies project. In D. Ludden (Ed.), Reading subaltern studies: Critical history, contested meaning and the globalization of South Asia(pp.).New Delhi: Pauls Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swords, A. (2010). Teaching against neo-liberalism in chiapas, Mexico: gendered resistance via Neo-Zapatista network polities. In P. McMichael (Ed.). Contesting development: Critical struggles for social change.(pp. ) New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuhiwai-Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veissiere, S. (2009). Notes and queries for an activist street anthropology: Street resistance, gringopolitica, and the quest for subaltern visions in Salvador da Bahia, Brazil. In D. Kapoor & S. Jordan (Eds.), Education, participatory action research and social change (pp. ). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, H. (2010). Mobilizing agrarian citizenship: A new rural paradigm for Brazil. In P. McMichael (Ed.) Contesting development: Critical struggles for social change(pp.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kapoor, D. (2013). Anti-Colonial Subaltern Social Movement (SSM) Learning and Development Dispossession in India. In: Mayo, P. (eds) Learning with Adults. International Issues in Adult Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-335-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics